H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Amanda Anisimova vs Magda Linette H2H: 1-2
Magda Linette holds a 2–1 lead over Amanda Anisimova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Magda Linette leads 2–0 on grass, while Amanda Anisimova leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Magda Linette won the 2021 Wimbledon first round 2-6 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 24
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
POL
Age 34
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 30, 2021* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Magda Linette | 2-6 6-3 6-1 | Amanda Anisimova | Match data |
| Apr 7, 2021* | Charleston 1 | WTA 500 | R64 | Clay | Amanda Anisimova | 5-7 6-2 6-3 | Magda Linette | Match data |
| Jul 4, 2019* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Magda Linette | 6-4 7-5 | Amanda Anisimova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amanda Anisimova | #9 | #4 | 6,680 | 2,123 | 172 | 103 | 62.5% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 |
| Magda Linette | #51 | #19 | 1,921 | 1,863 | 219 | 227 | 49.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Amanda Anisimova | Magda Linette | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #191 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2018 | 11–6 | 64.7% | #96 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2019 | 23–12 | 65.7% | #24 | 1,770 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2020 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #30 | 1,768 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2021 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #78 | 1,774 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2022 | 33–14 | 70.2% | #23 | 1,902 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2023 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #369 | 1,777 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #123 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2024 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #36 | 1,867 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #133 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2025 | 45–16 | 73.8% | #4 | 2,112 | 0 | 4 | 2015 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #90 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2026 | 16–9 | 64.0% | #9 | 1,999 | 0 | 4 | 2016 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #96 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #72 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #81 | 1,589 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #43 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #40 | 1,720 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #57 | 1,763 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #48 | 1,720 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #24 | 1,732 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #38 | 1,827 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #54 | 1,742 | 0 | 4 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 18–14 | 56.2% | #51 | 1,799 | 0 | 4 |