H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Amanda Anisimova vs Naomi Osaka H2H: 3-0
Amanda Anisimova holds a 3–0 lead over Naomi Osaka in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Amanda Anisimova leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Amanda Anisimova won the 2025 US Open semifinal 6-7(4) 7-6(3) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 24
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
JPN
Age 28
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 5, 2025 | US Open | Grand Slam | SF | Hard | Amanda Anisimova | 6-7(4) 7-6(3) 6-3 | Naomi Osaka | Match data |
| May 24, 2022* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Amanda Anisimova | 7-5 6-4 | Naomi Osaka | Match data |
| Jan 23, 2022* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Amanda Anisimova | 4-6 6-3 7-6(5) | Naomi Osaka | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amanda Anisimova | #9 | #4 | 6,680 | 2,123 | 172 | 103 | 62.5% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 |
| Naomi Osaka | #13 | #1 | 7,985 | 2,140 | 240 | 130 | 64.9% | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Amanda Anisimova | Naomi Osaka | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #191 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2018 | 11–6 | 64.7% | #96 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #260 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2019 | 23–12 | 65.7% | #24 | 1,770 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #144 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2020 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #30 | 1,768 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 20–13 | 60.6% | #48 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2021 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #78 | 1,774 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #68 | 1,697 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2022 | 33–14 | 70.2% | #23 | 1,902 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 39–19 | 67.2% | #5 | 1,904 | 1 | 2 |
| 21 | 2023 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #369 | 1,777 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 40–13 | 75.5% | #3 | 2,030 | 2 | 5 |
| 22 | 2024 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #36 | 1,867 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 16–3 | 84.2% | #3 | 2,082 | 3 | 6 |
| 23 | 2025 | 45–16 | 73.8% | #4 | 2,112 | 0 | 4 | 2021 | 18–7 | 72.0% | #13 | 2,002 | 4 | 7 |
| 24 | 2026 | 16–9 | 64.0% | #9 | 1,999 | 0 | 4 | 2022 | 15–11 | 57.7% | #42 | 1,894 | 4 | 7 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 21–16 | 56.8% | #57 | 1,883 | 4 | 7 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 31–14 | 68.9% | #16 | 1,968 | 4 | 8 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 19–8 | 70.4% | #13 | 2,044 | 4 | 8 |