H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 22:32 UTC
Amanda Anisimova vs Ons Jabeur H2H: 0-1
Ons Jabeur holds a 1–0 lead over Amanda Anisimova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ons Jabeur leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Ons Jabeur won the 2022 Charleston semifinal 2-6 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 24
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
TUN
Age 31
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 9, 2022* | Charleston | WTA 500 | SF | Clay | Ons Jabeur | 2-6 6-1 6-4 | Amanda Anisimova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amanda Anisimova | #9 | #4 | 6,680 | 2,123 | 172 | 103 | 62.5% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 |
| Ons Jabeur | #439 | #2 | 5,210 | 2,105 | 222 | 151 | 59.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Amanda Anisimova | Ons Jabeur | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #191 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2018 | 11–6 | 64.7% | #96 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2019 | 23–12 | 65.7% | #24 | 1,770 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #260 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2020 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #30 | 1,768 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #137 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2021 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #78 | 1,774 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #143 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2022 | 33–14 | 70.2% | #23 | 1,902 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #220 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2023 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #369 | 1,777 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #196 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2024 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #36 | 1,867 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #88 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2025 | 45–16 | 73.8% | #4 | 2,112 | 0 | 4 | 2018 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #60 | 1,734 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2026 | 16–9 | 64.0% | #9 | 1,999 | 0 | 4 | 2019 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #76 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 21–11 | 65.6% | #31 | 1,858 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 48–18 | 72.7% | #10 | 1,982 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 47–17 | 73.4% | #2 | 2,007 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 36–18 | 66.7% | #6 | 1,952 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #42 | 1,856 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #75 | 1,820 | 0 | 5 |