H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC
Amanda Anisimova vs Petra Martic H2H: 2-1
Amanda Anisimova holds a 2–1 lead over Petra Martic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Amanda Anisimova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Amanda Anisimova won the 2022 Madrid third round 3-6 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 24
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
CRO
Age 35
Right-Handed
181 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 2, 2022* | Madrid | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Amanda Anisimova | 3-6 6-3 6-2 | Petra Martic | Match data |
| Apr 3, 2019* | Charleston | WTA 500 | R64 | Clay | Petra Martic | 6-4 2-6 6-1 | Amanda Anisimova | Match data |
| Aug 16, 2018* | Cincinnati | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Amanda Anisimova | 6-4 6-3 | Petra Martic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amanda Anisimova | #9 | #4 | 6,680 | 2,123 | 172 | 103 | 62.5% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 |
| Petra Martic | #349 | #14 | 2,850 | 1,942 | 212 | 214 | 49.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Amanda Anisimova | Petra Martic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #191 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2018 | 11–6 | 64.7% | #96 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #330 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2019 | 23–12 | 65.7% | #24 | 1,770 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #215 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2020 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #30 | 1,768 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #82 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2021 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #78 | 1,774 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #142 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2022 | 33–14 | 70.2% | #23 | 1,902 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #50 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2023 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #369 | 1,777 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,690 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2024 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #36 | 1,867 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #107 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2025 | 45–16 | 73.8% | #4 | 2,112 | 0 | 4 | 2014 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #186 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2026 | 16–9 | 64.0% | #9 | 1,999 | 0 | 4 | 2015 | 0–8 | 0.0% | #148 | 1,435 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #262 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #89 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 26–17 | 60.5% | #32 | 1,795 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 36–17 | 67.9% | #15 | 1,903 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #18 | 1,805 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #54 | 1,658 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #38 | 1,794 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #40 | 1,808 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #122 | 1,649 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #209 | 1,611 | 0 | 2 |