H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Amanda Anisimova vs Petra Martic H2H: 2-1

Amanda Anisimova holds a 2–1 lead over Petra Martic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Amanda Anisimova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Amanda Anisimova won the 2022 Madrid Open second round 3-6 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Amanda Anisimova
United States Age 25 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main-draw meetings
Petra Martic
Croatia Age 35 Right-Handed 181 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Amanda Anisimova #33 3-6 6-3 6-2 Petra Martic #58 Match data May 2, 2022* R32 Madrid Open WTA 1000 Clay
Petra Martic #53 6-4 2-6 6-1 Amanda Anisimova #74 Match data Apr 3, 2019* R64 Charleston Open Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Clay
Amanda Anisimova #173 6-4 6-3 Petra Martic #51 Match data Aug 16, 2018* R32 Cincinnati Open Premier 5 → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Amanda Anisimova #10 #4 6,680 2,125 179 107 62.6% 0 2 0 0 2 4
Petra Martic #349 #14 2,850 1,938 212 215 49.6% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amanda Anisimova Petra Martic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2017 0–2 0.0% #191 1,482 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 2018 11–6 64.7% #96 1,683 0 0 2007 0–1 0.0% #330 1,480 0 0
17 2019 23–13 63.9% #24 1,765 0 1 2008 2–1 66.7% #215 1,505 0 0
18 2020 11–10 52.4% #30 1,778 0 1 2009 6–7 46.2% #82 1,538 0 0
19 2021 14–15 48.3% #78 1,779 0 1 2010 5–14 26.3% #142 1,516 0 0
20 2022 33–14 70.2% #23 1,927 0 2 2011 16–14 53.3% #50 1,621 0 0
21 2023 2–7 22.2% #369 1,793 0 2 2012 18–18 50.0% #59 1,691 0 0
22 2024 17–12 58.6% #36 1,892 0 2 2013 7–12 36.8% #107 1,607 0 0
23 2025 45–16 73.8% #4 2,114 0 4 2014 1–8 11.1% #186 1,515 0 0
24 2026 23–12 65.7% #10 2,011 0 4 2015 0–8 0.0% #148 1,435 0 0
25 — — — — — — — 2016 3–3 50.0% #262 1,525 0 0
26 — — — — — — — 2017 6–4 60.0% #89 1,613 0 0
27 — — — — — — — 2018 26–17 60.5% #32 1,798 0 0
28 — — — — — — — 2019 36–17 67.9% #15 1,901 0 1
29 — — — — — — — 2020 14–11 56.0% #18 1,804 0 1
30 — — — — — — — 2021 15–21 41.7% #54 1,656 0 1
31 — — — — — — — 2022 25–17 59.5% #38 1,796 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2023 20–19 51.3% #40 1,806 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 2024 9–19 32.1% #122 1,635 0 2
34 — — — — — — — 2025 3–4 42.9% #209 1,606 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Amanda Anisimova Petra Martic
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 2017 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2018 11 6 17 64.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2019 9 8 17 52.9% 11 3 14 78.6% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2008 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2020 8 7 15 53.3% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2009 3 4 7 42.9% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — —
19 2021 8 7 15 53.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2010 3 7 10 30.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
20 2022 14 8 22 63.6% 13 4 17 76.5% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 2011 11 9 20 55.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
21 2023 2 6 8 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2012 12 12 24 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
22 2024 15 8 23 65.2% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2013 1 6 7 14.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
23 2025 27 10 37 73.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 12 3 15 80.0% — — — — 2014 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 2026 18 9 27 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2015 0 4 4 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — —
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — —
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 0 2 2 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — —
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 18 10 28 64.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 14 12 26 53.8% 16 3 19 84.2% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 8 7 15 53.3% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 7 13 20 35.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 11 9 20 55.0% 11 5 16 68.8% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 12 13 25 48.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 5 11 16 31.3% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 112 70 182 61.5% 41 25 66 62.1% 26 12 38 68.4% — — — — — 109 129 238 45.8% 77 63 140 55.0% 24 21 45 53.3% 2 2 4 50.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 258/290 of Amanda Anisimova's and 406/427 of Petra Martic's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Amanda Anisimova Petra Martic
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
15 2017 2/2 2.0 3.0 56.5% 58.9% 38.9% 56.1% 46.1% 50.4% 45.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
16 2018 16/17 0.9 3.0 67.0% 66.6% 51.5% 59.8% 49.3% 61.5% 46.2% 2007 1/1 4.0 3.0 51.0% 75.5% 55.3% 50.0% 33.3% 65.6% 38.4%
17 2019 35/36 1.4 3.8 65.4% 63.1% 48.2% 61.3% 48.8% 57.6% 47.7% 2008 2/3 3.0 5.5 66.8% 69.2% 33.8% 56.3% 66.7% 57.6% 48.6%
18 2020 20/21 1.6 2.8 66.6% 60.7% 45.3% 46.4% 44.0% 55.2% 43.6% 2009 12/13 2.0 3.0 60.5% 63.9% 45.2% 60.5% 50.2% 57.0% 40.2%
19 2021 29/29 2.2 3.1 66.0% 65.3% 47.5% 50.6% 54.4% 59.4% 46.2% 2010 18/19 2.4 4.3 62.9% 60.8% 45.8% 55.5% 38.6% 55.0% 37.5%
20 2022 44/47 2.9 3.6 65.6% 66.5% 48.7% 52.8% 50.6% 60.3% 44.5% 2011 27/30 3.8 5.3 56.2% 64.5% 47.1% 50.8% 38.7% 56.7% 41.6%
21 2023 9/9 1.8 4.1 65.2% 61.7% 44.6% 47.8% 42.5% 55.7% 40.9% 2012 35/36 4.6 4.3 57.8% 65.0% 45.4% 53.3% 48.4% 56.5% 40.2%
22 2024 28/29 2.9 4.6 61.6% 61.3% 49.1% 55.4% 53.8% 56.5% 44.0% 2013 16/19 4.2 5.4 60.1% 62.7% 45.0% 52.2% 33.9% 55.5% 40.1%
23 2025 44/64 3.9 4.2 63.1% 67.4% 49.9% 56.3% 47.4% 61.1% 44.5% 2014 7/9 3.7 4.0 53.2% 61.9% 39.2% 50.3% 47.2% 51.5% 35.3%
24 2026 31/36 3.5 4.0 64.0% 68.9% 50.4% 47.4% 54.2% 62.3% 47.2% 2015 6/8 4.2 5.3 56.0% 64.0% 40.8% 47.3% 50.6% 54.3% 30.8%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 6/6 4.0 4.7 66.0% 62.8% 47.5% 57.2% 40.4% 57.6% 39.3%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 10/10 3.4 2.7 68.9% 66.1% 50.3% 55.1% 51.5% 61.0% 45.4%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 43/43 3.2 2.2 62.8% 66.7% 48.8% 56.4% 43.9% 60.2% 42.8%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 52/53 2.6 2.7 64.0% 66.8% 49.8% 59.9% 49.1% 60.7% 44.2%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 25/25 3.2 2.6 61.7% 65.2% 50.7% 64.0% 39.1% 59.6% 41.7%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 36/36 3.8 2.8 58.8% 66.3% 46.7% 51.1% 43.6% 58.1% 39.1%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 42/42 4.5 3.3 60.1% 67.7% 49.2% 48.0% 43.3% 60.1% 40.9%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 38/39 4.8 3.4 57.1% 68.6% 47.9% 56.2% 40.1% 60.0% 39.8%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2024 27/28 4.4 3.5 58.8% 67.3% 42.8% 47.6% 49.7% 57.1% 37.9%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2025 3/7 1.7 3.7 62.1% 57.5% 38.4% 45.6% 35.6% 50.5% 41.2%
Career — 258/290 2.6 3.8 64.6% 65.1% 48.7% 53.7% 50.1% 59.2% 45.3% — 406/427 3.7 3.4 60.3% 65.9% 47.2% 54.3% 44.1% 58.4% 40.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Amanda Anisimova Petra Martic
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 2017 1483 101.2 -0.25 -2.07 0.921 48.2% — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–2 — — +0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2018 1683 142.2 +4.05 +2.84 1.199 54.1% +12 — — 68.6% +1.34 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — +0.18 2007 1480 97.4 -1.36 -1.85 1.117 51.0% — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 0–1 — +0.22
17 2019 1765 138.6 +0.98 +4.05 1.126 52.6% -48 -32 -110 63.0% +0.84 6–7 (46%) 6–1 (86%) 104.3 +0.69 2008 1506 104.8 -0.42 +0.18 1.145 53.2% +19 — — 62.5% +0.63 1–1 1–0 — +0.27
18 2020 1778 138.0 -0.33 +0.69 0.973 49.5% -19 -30 — 55.6% +0.18 2–3 (40%) 3–2 (60%) 98.4 -0.42 2009 1539 112.1 +0.24 -2.39 0.933 48.5% +1 +22 — 50.0% -0.21 0–2 2–1 (67%) — +0.36
19 2021 1780 139.7 +2.46 +2.91 1.136 52.6% +8 -45 -146 51.5% +0.55 2–8 (20%) 2–4 (33%) 92.9 -1.37 2010 1517 116.5 -0.78 -3.50 0.832 46.5% +35 -37 — 31.8% -1.23 4–4 (50%) 4–4 (50%) 102.7 -0.85
20 2022 1927 151.1 +2.94 +2.37 1.120 52.3% -73 -6 -126 65.1% +0.87 13–5 (72%) 5–2 (71%) 110.1 -2.09 2011 1622 125.1 +0.45 -1.86 0.961 48.9% +17 -104 — 51.4% +0.07 10–4 (71%) 4–0 (100%) 111.1 +0.97
21 2023 1794 127.1 -0.58 -0.40 0.923 48.2% -29 — — 29.4% -1.00 0–1 0–2 — -0.26 2012 1692 131.0 +0.67 -2.20 0.926 48.6% -8 -98 — 48.8% -0.17 8–4 (67%) 3–6 (33%) 104.8 -1.21
22 2024 1892 146.4 +0.57 +1.45 1.010 50.3% +36 -108 — 62.3% +0.41 3–6 (33%) 3–4 (43%) 96.8 -1.57 2013 1607 115.3 -1.25 -2.67 0.900 48.0% -10 -6 +18 41.9% -0.47 3–4 (43%) 2–3 (40%) 99.1 -0.05
23 2025 2115 162.2 +3.85 +2.19 1.142 52.6% +10 -238 -59 66.7% +1.09 15–4 (79%) 9–5 (64%) 113.5 -0.29 2014 1516 93.7 -1.25 -4.62 0.729 43.8% +28 — — 17.6% -2.53 0–1 1–1 — +0.24
24 2026 2012 157.7 +4.35 +4.19 1.250 54.7% +43 -142 +2 60.8% +1.05 7–6 (54%) 3–4 (43%) 96.9 +1.28 2015 1435 105.3 -1.11 -3.28 0.673 43.0% +70 +50 — 0.0% -3.06 — — — -0.11
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1525 114.6 -0.08 -2.76 0.925 48.4% — +9 — 46.7% -0.53 2–1 (67%) 1–0 — -0.05
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1613 126.9 +3.55 +1.52 1.162 53.0% — +3 +54 60.0% +0.96 2–3 (40%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.03
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1798 139.6 +3.00 +0.36 1.076 51.1% -18 -100 -125 58.3% +0.55 8–4 (67%) 6–4 (60%) 106.6 -0.04
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1901 146.2 +3.96 +1.65 1.124 52.4% -93 +30 -139 58.5% +0.79 15–3 (83%) 4–6 (40%) 110.1 -0.27
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1805 132.1 +1.70 -1.09 1.032 50.6% -35 +79 — 56.7% +0.28 4–6 (40%) 7–3 (70%) 98.0 +1.15
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1657 123.5 +1.00 -2.75 0.932 48.5% -33 +198 +99 43.7% -0.22 7–8 (47%) 4–8 (33%) 94.0 +2.13
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1796 134.2 +2.70 -0.72 1.026 50.4% -88 +143 -60 56.3% +0.31 8–4 (67%) 10–5 (67%) 107.9 +0.20
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1807 141.5 +3.00 -1.92 0.994 49.7% -62 +90 +3 47.1% -0.20 8–5 (62%) 5–6 (45%) 103.2 -0.59
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1636 121.5 +0.25 -3.87 0.883 47.5% -6 +131 +180 35.4% -0.94 4–5 (44%) 3–3 (50%) 97.0 +0.09
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1607 111.0 -0.30 -0.75 0.832 45.5% -40 +116 — 47.4% -0.53 2–3 (40%) 0–1 — +0.57
Career — 2126 156.9 +2.36 +2.51 1.111 52.2% -1 -68 -83 61.2% +0.77 49–44 (53%) 32–25 (56%) 106.2 -1.30 — 1938 136.0 +1.65 -1.36 0.980 49.5% -28 +38 -14 48.7% -0.08 86–63 (58%) 58–54 (52%) 109.3 +0.72

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.