H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC
Amanda Anisimova holds a 1–0 lead over Renata Zarazua in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Amanda Anisimova leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Amanda Anisimova won the 2025 Wimbledon second round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amanda Anisimova | 6-4 6-3 | Renata Zarazua | Match data | Jul 2, 2025 | R64 | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | Grass |
| Amanda Anisimova | 6-4 6-4 | Renata Zarazua | Match data | Jul 28, 2024 | Q2 | Washington Open | WTA 500 | Hard |
1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amanda Anisimova | #10 | #4 | 6,680 | 2,125 | 179 | 107 | 62.6% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 |
| Renata Zarazua | #74 | #51 | 1,063 | 1,745 | 32 | 63 | 33.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Amanda Anisimova | Renata Zarazua | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #191 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2018 | 11–6 | 64.7% | #96 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2019 | 23–13 | 63.9% | #24 | 1,765 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2020 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #30 | 1,778 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #299 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2021 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #78 | 1,779 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #251 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2022 | 33–14 | 70.2% | #23 | 1,927 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #257 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2023 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #369 | 1,793 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #263 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2024 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #36 | 1,892 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #142 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2025 | 45–16 | 73.8% | #4 | 2,114 | 0 | 4 | 2021 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #135 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2026 | 23–12 | 65.7% | #10 | 2,011 | 0 | 4 | 2022 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #368 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #104 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #75 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #79 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #74 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Amanda Anisimova | Renata Zarazua | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 15 | 2017 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2018 | 11 | 6 | 17 | 64.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2019 | 9 | 8 | 17 | 52.9% | 11 | 3 | 14 | 78.6% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2020 | 8 | 7 | 15 | 53.3% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2021 | 8 | 7 | 15 | 53.3% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 2017 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2022 | 14 | 8 | 22 | 63.6% | 13 | 4 | 17 | 76.5% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | 2018 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2023 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2024 | 15 | 8 | 23 | 65.2% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2025 | 27 | 10 | 37 | 73.0% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | 12 | 3 | 15 | 80.0% | 2021 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2026 | 18 | 9 | 27 | 66.7% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 2022 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 9 | 13 | 22 | 40.9% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 6 | 9 | 15 | 40.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% |
| Career | — | 112 | 70 | 182 | 61.5% | 41 | 25 | 66 | 62.1% | 26 | 12 | 38 | 68.4% | — | 26 | 43 | 69 | 37.7% | 5 | 14 | 19 | 26.3% | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 258/290 of Amanda Anisimova's and 86/95 of Renata Zarazua's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Amanda Anisimova | Renata Zarazua | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 15 | 2017 | 2/2 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 56.5% | 58.9% | 38.9% | 56.1% | 46.1% | 50.4% | 45.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2018 | 16/17 | 0.9 | 3.0 | 67.0% | 66.6% | 51.5% | 59.8% | 49.3% | 61.5% | 46.2% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2019 | 35/36 | 1.4 | 3.8 | 65.4% | 63.1% | 48.2% | 61.3% | 48.8% | 57.6% | 47.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2020 | 20/21 | 1.6 | 2.8 | 66.6% | 60.7% | 45.3% | 46.4% | 44.0% | 55.2% | 43.6% | 2016 | 1/1 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 77.4% | 50.0% | 50.0% | 63.6% | 60.0% | 50.0% | 45.1% |
| 19 | 2021 | 29/29 | 2.2 | 3.1 | 66.0% | 65.3% | 47.5% | 50.6% | 54.4% | 59.4% | 46.2% | 2017 | 2/2 | 0.0 | 7.5 | 72.5% | 56.8% | 33.6% | 52.1% | 43.3% | 50.4% | 41.2% |
| 20 | 2022 | 44/47 | 2.9 | 3.6 | 65.6% | 66.5% | 48.7% | 52.8% | 50.6% | 60.3% | 44.5% | 2018 | 5/5 | 0.4 | 3.8 | 72.3% | 54.7% | 36.0% | 32.6% | 57.3% | 49.7% | 38.5% |
| 21 | 2023 | 9/9 | 1.8 | 4.1 | 65.2% | 61.7% | 44.6% | 47.8% | 42.5% | 55.7% | 40.9% | 2019 | 3/3 | 0.3 | 4.3 | 63.2% | 54.8% | 43.8% | 48.8% | 58.3% | 51.0% | 40.8% |
| 22 | 2024 | 28/29 | 2.9 | 4.6 | 61.6% | 61.3% | 49.1% | 55.4% | 53.8% | 56.5% | 44.0% | 2020 | 6/6 | 0.0 | 3.5 | 69.2% | 61.1% | 55.3% | 43.2% | 50.3% | 58.9% | 47.8% |
| 23 | 2025 | 44/64 | 3.9 | 4.2 | 63.1% | 67.4% | 49.9% | 56.3% | 47.4% | 61.1% | 44.5% | 2021 | 7/8 | 0.0 | 3.3 | 70.7% | 51.8% | 32.6% | 27.9% | 34.8% | 45.6% | 45.0% |
| 24 | 2026 | 31/36 | 3.5 | 4.0 | 64.0% | 68.9% | 50.4% | 47.4% | 54.2% | 62.3% | 47.2% | 2022 | 3/3 | 0.3 | 4.3 | 68.5% | 49.5% | 45.1% | 49.7% | 41.7% | 46.4% | 33.5% |
| 25 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 1/1 | 1.0 | 3.0 | 73.0% | 65.2% | 23.5% | 50.0% | 100.0% | 54.0% | 23.2% |
| 26 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 16/16 | 0.6 | 2.6 | 69.1% | 59.2% | 47.4% | 53.3% | 46.8% | 55.2% | 47.1% |
| 27 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 19/27 | 0.9 | 2.6 | 70.9% | 57.8% | 47.3% | 55.1% | 49.2% | 54.6% | 45.0% |
| 28 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 23/23 | 0.3 | 1.4 | 74.2% | 56.4% | 46.3% | 50.3% | 42.2% | 53.5% | 38.6% |
| Career | — | 258/290 | 2.6 | 3.8 | 64.6% | 65.1% | 48.7% | 53.7% | 50.1% | 59.2% | 45.3% | — | 86/95 | 0.5 | 2.7 | 71.2% | 56.8% | 45.0% | 48.7% | 46.9% | 53.1% | 42.6% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Amanda Anisimova | Renata Zarazua | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 15 | 2017 | 1483 | 101.2 | -0.25 | -2.07 | 0.921 | 48.2% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -0.67 | 0–2 | — | — | +0.19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2018 | 1683 | 142.2 | +4.05 | +2.84 | 1.199 | 54.1% | +12 | — | — | 68.6% | +1.34 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–1 | — | +0.18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2019 | 1765 | 138.6 | +0.98 | +4.05 | 1.126 | 52.6% | -48 | -32 | -110 | 63.0% | +0.84 | 6–7 (46%) | 6–1 (86%) | 104.3 | +0.69 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2020 | 1778 | 138.0 | -0.33 | +0.69 | 0.973 | 49.5% | -19 | -30 | — | 55.6% | +0.18 | 2–3 (40%) | 3–2 (60%) | 98.4 | -0.42 | 2016 | 1501 | 101.8 | -0.30 | -0.72 | 0.903 | 47.7% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.00 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | +0.06 |
| 19 | 2021 | 1780 | 139.7 | +2.46 | +2.91 | 1.136 | 52.6% | +8 | -45 | -146 | 51.5% | +0.55 | 2–8 (20%) | 2–4 (33%) | 92.9 | -1.37 | 2017 | 1484 | 104.1 | -1.35 | +1.94 | 0.831 | 46.3% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.84 | 0–2 | 1–0 | — | -0.17 |
| 20 | 2022 | 1927 | 151.1 | +2.94 | +2.37 | 1.120 | 52.3% | -73 | -6 | -126 | 65.1% | +0.87 | 13–5 (72%) | 5–2 (71%) | 110.1 | -2.09 | 2018 | 1530 | 109.5 | -1.33 | -1.87 | 0.765 | 43.7% | -18 | — | — | 36.4% | -1.73 | 1–0 | 1–0 | — | -0.18 |
| 21 | 2023 | 1794 | 127.1 | -0.58 | -0.40 | 0.923 | 48.2% | -29 | — | — | 29.4% | -1.00 | 0–1 | 0–2 | — | -0.26 | 2019 | 1540 | 109.7 | -2.00 | -1.88 | 0.832 | 46.2% | — | — | — | 14.3% | -1.14 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | -0.18 |
| 22 | 2024 | 1892 | 146.4 | +0.57 | +1.45 | 1.010 | 50.3% | +36 | -108 | — | 62.3% | +0.41 | 3–6 (33%) | 3–4 (43%) | 96.8 | -1.57 | 2020 | 1583 | 113.8 | +0.67 | +1.66 | 1.164 | 53.1% | -43 | — | — | 60.0% | +1.27 | 2–1 (67%) | — | — | +0.50 |
| 23 | 2025 | 2115 | 162.2 | +3.85 | +2.19 | 1.142 | 52.6% | +10 | -238 | -59 | 66.7% | +1.09 | 15–4 (79%) | 9–5 (64%) | 113.5 | -0.29 | 2021 | 1587 | 96.6 | -4.38 | -1.02 | 0.827 | 45.1% | +5 | — | — | 27.8% | -1.78 | 1–1 | 1–1 | — | +0.68 |
| 24 | 2026 | 2012 | 157.7 | +4.36 | +4.19 | 1.250 | 54.7% | +44 | -142 | +2 | 60.8% | +1.05 | 7–6 (54%) | 3–4 (43%) | 96.9 | +1.28 | 2022 | 1481 | 92.0 | -3.44 | -3.31 | 0.624 | 39.8% | — | — | — | 20.0% | -1.80 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.28 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 1603 | 103.4 | -0.19 | -0.97 | 0.504 | 39.5% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.13 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 1662 | 126.0 | -1.26 | +1.82 | 1.052 | 51.1% | -137 | +84 | — | 42.1% | +0.05 | 2–4 (33%) | 1–3 (25%) | 96.6 | +0.90 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1715 | 133.2 | -1.75 | +1.58 | 0.990 | 49.7% | -2 | -101 | — | 43.9% | -0.38 | 3–9 (25%) | 2–5 (29%) | 96.1 | -0.05 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 1630 | 117.5 | -2.97 | -2.32 | 0.831 | 46.2% | +16 | -72 | -32 | 35.8% | -1.17 | 4–3 (57%) | 0–2 | — | -0.11 |
| Career | — | 2126 | 156.9 | +2.36 | +2.51 | 1.111 | 52.2% | -1 | -68 | -83 | 61.2% | +0.77 | 49–44 (53%) | 32–25 (56%) | 106.2 | -1.30 | — | 1745 | 122.4 | -2.03 | -0.16 | 0.909 | 47.8% | -25 | -23 | -32 | 38.8% | -0.69 | 13–23 (36%) | 7–14 (33%) | 93.0 | +1.96 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aryna Sabalenka | 6 | 5 | 11 | Nov 7, 2025 | H2H |
| Karolina Pliskova | 1 | 6 | 7 | Feb 9, 2026 | H2H |
| Jessica Pegula | 0 | 6 | 6 | Aug 20, 2026 | H2H |
| Elina Svitolina | 1 | 5 | 6 | Aug 9, 2026 | H2H |
| Belinda Bencic | 2 | 3 | 5 | Mar 24, 2026 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hailey Baptiste | 2 | 1 | 3 | Apr 1, 2026 | H2H |
| Sloane Stephens | 3 | 0 | 3 | Mar 30, 2026 | H2H |
| Ajla Tomljanovic | 1 | 2 | 3 | Aug 20, 2025 | H2H |
| Leylah Fernandez | 0 | 2 | 2 | Aug 5, 2026 | H2H |
| Xinyu Wang | 0 | 2 | 2 | Jun 22, 2026 | H2H |