H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Amanda Anisimova vs Sachia Vickery H2H: 1-0
Amanda Anisimova holds a 1–0 lead over Sachia Vickery in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Amanda Anisimova leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Amanda Anisimova won the 2022 Charleston second round 6-0 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 24
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 31
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 6, 2022* | Charleston | WTA 500 | R64 | Clay | Amanda Anisimova | 6-0 7-5 | Sachia Vickery | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amanda Anisimova | #9 | #4 | 6,680 | 2,123 | 172 | 103 | 62.5% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 |
| Sachia Vickery | #417 | #73 | 833 | 1,699 | 38 | 56 | 40.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Amanda Anisimova | Sachia Vickery | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #191 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2018 | 11–6 | 64.7% | #96 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2019 | 23–12 | 65.7% | #24 | 1,770 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2020 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #30 | 1,768 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #199 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2021 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #78 | 1,774 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #189 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2022 | 33–14 | 70.2% | #23 | 1,902 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #129 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2023 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #369 | 1,777 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #138 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2024 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #36 | 1,867 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #120 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2025 | 45–16 | 73.8% | #4 | 2,112 | 0 | 4 | 2018 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #101 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2026 | 16–9 | 64.0% | #9 | 1,999 | 0 | 4 | 2019 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #157 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #158 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #221 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #184 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #146 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #201 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |