H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 22:32 UTC
Amanda Anisimova vs Simona Halep H2H: 1-3
Simona Halep holds a 3–1 lead over Amanda Anisimova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Simona Halep leads 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Simona Halep won the 2022 Wimbledon quarterfinal 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 24
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
ROU
Age 34
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 7, 2022* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | QF | Grass | Simona Halep | 6-2 6-4 | Amanda Anisimova | Match data |
| Jun 24, 2022* | Bad Homburg | WTA 500 | QF | Grass | Simona Halep | 6-2 6-1 | Amanda Anisimova | Match data |
| Oct 3, 2020* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R32 | Clay | Simona Halep | 6-0 6-1 | Amanda Anisimova | Match data |
| Jun 6, 2019* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | QF | Clay | Amanda Anisimova | 6-2 6-4 | Simona Halep | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amanda Anisimova | #9 | #4 | 6,680 | 2,123 | 172 | 103 | 62.5% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 |
| Simona Halep | #873 | #1 | 8,290 | 2,111 | 446 | 197 | 69.4% | 2 | 10 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 24 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Amanda Anisimova | Simona Halep | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #191 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2018 | 11–6 | 64.7% | #96 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2019 | 23–12 | 65.7% | #24 | 1,770 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2020 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #30 | 1,768 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #84 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2021 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #78 | 1,774 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #47 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2022 | 33–14 | 70.2% | #23 | 1,902 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #47 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2023 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #369 | 1,777 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 50–17 | 74.6% | #11 | 2,004 | 0 | 6 |
| 22 | 2024 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #36 | 1,867 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 46–18 | 71.9% | #3 | 1,969 | 0 | 8 |
| 23 | 2025 | 45–16 | 73.8% | #4 | 2,112 | 0 | 4 | 2015 | 49–16 | 75.4% | #2 | 1,929 | 0 | 11 |
| 24 | 2026 | 16–9 | 64.0% | #9 | 1,999 | 0 | 4 | 2016 | 41–14 | 74.5% | #4 | 1,997 | 0 | 14 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 44–18 | 71.0% | #1 | 1,973 | 0 | 15 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 45–12 | 78.9% | #1 | 2,005 | 1 | 18 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 39–16 | 70.9% | #4 | 1,938 | 2 | 19 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 23–3 | 88.5% | #2 | 2,056 | 2 | 22 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 24–13 | 64.9% | #20 | 1,949 | 2 | 22 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 39–13 | 75.0% | #10 | 1,986 | 2 | 24 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #873 | 1,913 | 2 | 24 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #873 | 1,887 | 2 | 24 |