H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Amanda Anisimova vs Tereza Martincova H2H: 3-0
Amanda Anisimova holds a 3–0 lead over Tereza Martincova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Amanda Anisimova leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Amanda Anisimova won the 2022 Rome second round 6-2 0-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 24
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 31
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 11, 2022* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Amanda Anisimova | 6-2 0-6 6-4 | Tereza Martincova | Match data |
| Aug 11, 2021* | Montreal | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Amanda Anisimova | 6-1 4-3 RET+H64 | Tereza Martincova | Match data |
| Jun 20, 2019* | Mallorca | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Amanda Anisimova | 3-6 7-6(7) 6-4 | Tereza Martincova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amanda Anisimova | #9 | #4 | 6,680 | 2,123 | 172 | 103 | 62.5% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 |
| Tereza Martincova | #283 | #40 | 1,293 | 1,800 | 70 | 102 | 40.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Amanda Anisimova | Tereza Martincova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #191 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2018 | 11–6 | 64.7% | #96 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2019 | 23–12 | 65.7% | #24 | 1,770 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2020 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #30 | 1,768 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #296 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2021 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #78 | 1,774 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #265 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2022 | 33–14 | 70.2% | #23 | 1,902 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #180 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2023 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #369 | 1,777 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #163 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2024 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #36 | 1,867 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #142 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2025 | 45–16 | 73.8% | #4 | 2,112 | 0 | 4 | 2018 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #197 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2026 | 16–9 | 64.0% | #9 | 1,999 | 0 | 4 | 2019 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #135 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #120 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #48 | 1,773 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 17–25 | 40.5% | #71 | 1,740 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #155 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #331 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #283 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 |