H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 07:16 UTC
Amanda Anisimova vs Viktorija Golubic H2H: 2-0
Amanda Anisimova holds a 2–0 lead over Viktorija Golubic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Amanda Anisimova leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Amanda Anisimova won the 2025 Roland Garros second round 6-0 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 24
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 33
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 28, 2025 | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Amanda Anisimova | 6-0 6-2 | Viktorija Golubic | Match data |
| Sep 29, 2021* | Chicago 2 | WTA 500 | R64 | Hard | Amanda Anisimova | 6-0 5-7 6-4 | Viktorija Golubic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amanda Anisimova | #9 | #4 | 6,680 | 2,123 | 172 | 103 | 62.5% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 |
| Viktorija Golubic | #47 | #35 | 1,531 | 1,831 | 123 | 141 | 46.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Amanda Anisimova | Viktorija Golubic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #191 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2018 | 11–6 | 64.7% | #96 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2019 | 23–12 | 65.7% | #24 | 1,770 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2020 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #30 | 1,768 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2021 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #78 | 1,774 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2022 | 33–14 | 70.2% | #23 | 1,902 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #196 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2023 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #369 | 1,777 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #205 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2024 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #36 | 1,867 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2025 | 45–16 | 73.8% | #4 | 2,112 | 0 | 4 | 2016 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #56 | 1,686 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2026 | 16–9 | 64.0% | #9 | 1,999 | 0 | 4 | 2017 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #114 | 1,630 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #104 | 1,581 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #80 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #138 | 1,594 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #43 | 1,731 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #76 | 1,729 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #83 | 1,713 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #90 | 1,774 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #82 | 1,792 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #47 | 1,795 | 0 | 3 |