H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Amélie Mauresmo vs Eleni Daniilidou H2H: 4-1

Amélie Mauresmo holds a 4–1 lead over Eleni Daniilidou in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on grass, while Amélie Mauresmo leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Amélie Mauresmo won the 2008 Paris fourth round 3-0 RET.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Amélie Mauresmo
FRA Age 47 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
4 – 1
5 main draw meetings
Eleni Daniilidou
GRE Age 43 Right-Handed 182 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 8, 2008* Paris WTA 500 R16 Carpet Amélie Mauresmo #18 3-0 (ret.) Eleni Daniilidou #36 Match data
Oct 18, 2007* Zurich WTA 1000 R32 Hard Amélie Mauresmo #13 6-4 4-6 6-3 Eleni Daniilidou #43 Match data
Apr 30, 2004* Warsaw WTA 500 R16 Clay Amélie Mauresmo #3 6-2 7-6(3) Eleni Daniilidou #26 Match data
Jun 17, 2002 S Hertogenbosch WTA 250 QF Grass Eleni Daniilidou #51 6-4 6-4 Amélie Mauresmo #11 Match data
Jun 29, 2001* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Amélie Mauresmo #6 6-3 6-2 Eleni Daniilidou #141 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Amélie Mauresmo #21 #1 4,992 2,217 458 183 71.5% 2 6 1 15 1 25
Eleni Daniilidou #1,070 #14 1,639 1,878 185 203 47.7% 0 0 0 0 5 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amélie Mauresmo Eleni Daniilidou
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1995 0–1 0.0% #250 1,488 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1996 2–2 50.0% #180 1,522 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1997 4–6 40.0% #100 1,555 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1998 20–18 52.6% #29 1,729 0 0 2001 5–8 38.5% #81 1,506 0 0
19 1999 32–14 69.6% #10 1,914 0 1 2002 32–22 59.3% #22 1,778 0 1
20 2000 26–12 68.4% #16 1,932 0 2 2003 32–24 57.1% #26 1,706 0 2
21 2001 43–12 78.2% #9 2,029 0 6 2004 21–19 52.5% #34 1,683 0 3
22 2002 45–15 75.0% #6 2,060 0 8 2005 14–20 41.2% #69 1,638 0 3
23 2003 45–17 72.6% #4 2,061 0 10 2006 27–24 52.9% #36 1,720 0 4
24 2004 56–11 83.6% #2 2,175 0 15 2007 27–29 48.2% #42 1,720 0 4
25 2005 53–16 76.8% #3 2,127 0 19 2008 8–8 50.0% #144 1,700 0 5
26 2006 50–14 78.1% #3 2,135 2 23 2009 0–1 0.0% #157 1,677 0 5
27 2007 27–14 65.9% #18 1,960 2 24 2010 2–3 40.0% #165 1,666 0 5
28 2008 30–19 61.2% #24 1,815 2 24 2011 6–12 33.3% #90 1,566 0 5
29 2009 25–12 67.6% #21 1,871 2 25 2012 8–21 27.6% #100 1,483 0 5
30 — — — — — — — 2013 3–10 23.1% #186 1,431 0 5
31 — — — — — — — 2014 0–2 0.0% #414 1,412 0 5