H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC

Amélie Mauresmo vs Iveta Benesova H2H: 4-0

Amélie Mauresmo holds a 4–0 lead over Iveta Benesova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Amélie Mauresmo leads 3–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Amélie Mauresmo won the 2006 Antwerp fourth round 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Amélie Mauresmo
FRA Age 47 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
4 – 0
4 main draw meetings
Iveta Benesova
CZE Age 43 Left-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 17, 2006* Antwerp WTA 500 R16 Hard Amélie Mauresmo #2 6-3 6-3 Iveta Benesova #41 Match data
Nov 5, 2004* Philadelphia WTA 500 R16 Hard Amélie Mauresmo #2 6-2 6-2 Iveta Benesova #40 Match data
Aug 28, 2002* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Amélie Mauresmo #9 6-3 6-2 Iveta Benesova #113 Match data
Jun 26, 2002* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Amélie Mauresmo #11 6-1 6-7(0) 6-2 Iveta Benesova #121 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Amélie Mauresmo #21 #1 4,992 2,217 458 183 71.5% 2 6 1 15 1 25
Iveta Benesova #671 #25 1,811 1,760 177 221 44.5% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amélie Mauresmo Iveta Benesova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1995 0–1 0.0% #250 1,488 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1996 2–2 50.0% #180 1,522 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1997 4–6 40.0% #100 1,555 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1998 20–18 52.6% #29 1,729 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1999 32–14 69.6% #10 1,914 0 1 2002 6–9 40.0% #82 1,565 0 0
20 2000 26–12 68.4% #16 1,932 0 2 2003 9–19 32.1% #132 1,478 0 0
21 2001 43–12 78.2% #9 2,029 0 6 2004 25–19 56.8% #36 1,657 0 1
22 2002 45–15 75.0% #6 2,060 0 8 2005 21–27 43.8% #55 1,613 0 1
23 2003 45–17 72.6% #4 2,061 0 10 2006 17–21 44.7% #58 1,594 0 1
24 2004 56–11 83.6% #2 2,175 0 15 2007 6–14 30.0% #116 1,522 0 1
25 2005 53–16 76.8% #3 2,127 0 19 2008 20–17 54.1% #43 1,641 0 1
26 2006 50–14 78.1% #3 2,135 2 23 2009 29–25 53.7% #38 1,646 0 1
27 2007 27–14 65.9% #18 1,960 2 24 2010 18–24 42.9% #59 1,636 0 2
28 2008 30–19 61.2% #24 1,815 2 24 2011 16–24 40.0% #54 1,650 0 2
29 2009 25–12 67.6% #21 1,871 2 25 2012 10–17 37.0% #81 1,587 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 2014 0–5 0.0% #671 1,526 0 2