H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Amélie Mauresmo vs Maria Elena Camerin H2H: 1-0

Amélie Mauresmo holds a 1–0 lead over Maria Elena Camerin in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Amélie Mauresmo leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Amélie Mauresmo won the 2004 Athens Olympics second round 6-0 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Amélie Mauresmo
FRA Age 47 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Maria Elena Camerin
ITA Age 44 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Amélie Mauresmo #2 6-0 6-1 Maria Elena Camerin #67 Match data Aug 18, 2004* R32 Athens Olympics Olympics Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Amélie Mauresmo #21 #1 4,992 2,225 463 185 71.5% 2 6 1 15 1 25
Maria Elena Camerin #817 #41 774 1,667 98 148 39.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amélie Mauresmo Maria Elena Camerin
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1995 0–1 0.0% #250 1,488 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1996 2–2 50.0% #180 1,522 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1997 4–6 40.0% #100 1,556 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1998 20–18 52.6% #29 1,728 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1999 32–14 69.6% #10 1,911 0 1 2001 6–5 54.5% #112 1,546 0 0
20 2000 26–13 66.7% #16 1,906 0 2 2002 5–8 38.5% #123 1,524 0 0
21 2001 43–12 78.2% #9 2,022 0 6 2003 3–8 27.3% #100 1,494 0 0
22 2002 45–15 75.0% #6 2,061 0 8 2004 22–20 52.4% #43 1,663 0 0
23 2003 45–17 72.6% #4 2,065 0 10 2005 11–22 33.3% #99 1,564 0 0
24 2004 61–12 83.6% #2 2,178 0 15 2006 22–23 48.9% #50 1,610 0 0
25 2005 53–16 76.8% #3 2,133 0 19 2007 9–18 33.3% #100 1,546 0 0
26 2006 50–14 78.1% #3 2,165 2 23 2008 5–11 31.2% #104 1,512 0 0
27 2007 27–14 65.9% #18 1,972 2 24 2009 5–14 26.3% #114 1,475 0 0
28 2008 30–19 61.2% #24 1,820 2 24 2010 6–11 35.3% #111 1,495 0 0
29 2009 25–12 67.6% #21 1,873 2 25 2011 1–4 20.0% #177 1,491 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2012 1–2 33.3% #168 1,499 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2013 2–2 50.0% #192 1,519 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Amélie Mauresmo Maria Elena Camerin
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1995 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1996 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1997 — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1998 9 7 16 56.3% 8 6 14 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1999 19 7 26 73.1% 7 4 11 63.6% — — — — 6 3 9 66.7% 2001 0 1 1 0.0% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — —
20 2000 8 5 13 61.5% 13 4 17 76.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 2002 3 2 5 60.0% 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2001 15 7 22 68.2% 16 3 19 84.2% 2 1 3 66.7% 10 1 11 90.9% 2003 1 3 4 25.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
22 2002 25 5 30 83.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 7 2 9 77.8% 6 3 9 66.7% 2004 16 11 27 59.3% 5 6 11 45.5% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
23 2003 23 11 34 67.6% 15 3 18 83.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 2005 9 13 22 40.9% 1 5 6 16.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2004 35 7 42 83.3% 19 3 22 86.4% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — 2006 16 13 29 55.2% 5 7 12 41.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2005 36 10 46 78.3% 9 2 11 81.8% 5 2 7 71.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 2007 5 9 14 35.7% 4 7 11 36.4% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
26 2006 32 10 42 76.2% 6 2 8 75.0% 7 1 8 87.5% 5 1 6 83.3% 2008 3 4 7 42.9% 2 6 8 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 2007 13 7 20 65.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2009 4 9 13 30.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
28 2008 21 14 35 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2010 5 4 9 55.6% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
29 2009 12 7 19 63.2% 4 3 7 57.1% 4 2 6 66.7% 5 0 5 100.0% 2011 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 248 97 345 71.9% 118 46 164 72.0% 44 19 63 69.8% 53 23 76 69.7% — 62 71 133 46.6% 32 56 88 36.4% 4 19 23 17.4% 0 2 2 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 222/395 of Amélie Mauresmo's and 104/222 of Maria Elena Camerin's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Amélie Mauresmo Maria Elena Camerin
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 3/11 1.0 3.3 66.3% 64.6% 48.8% 70.5% 43.5% 59.2% 39.8%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 6/42 1.0 2.7 64.3% 55.2% 46.8% 52.7% 53.4% 51.8% 45.0%
23 2003 10/62 2.3 2.9 63.3% 73.3% 50.3% 41.3% 41.8% 65.2% 48.3% 2005 3/33 0.3 2.3 66.0% 47.5% 32.0% 53.9% 44.4% 42.5% 38.4%
24 2004 18/73 4.5 4.4 58.2% 74.6% 52.0% 54.6% 50.2% 65.2% 51.1% 2006 19/45 0.8 3.7 62.8% 58.0% 45.5% 50.8% 51.1% 53.2% 44.0%
25 2005 24/69 3.2 4.3 58.0% 72.7% 50.1% 57.2% 55.5% 63.0% 47.6% 2007 19/27 0.7 5.8 60.3% 56.8% 40.9% 46.5% 50.0% 50.8% 44.1%
26 2006 55/64 2.6 2.9 64.8% 68.0% 49.1% 60.4% 53.9% 61.2% 47.1% 2008 13/16 0.5 4.5 63.7% 54.4% 41.2% 36.3% 47.4% 49.5% 38.7%
27 2007 36/41 4.4 4.8 61.2% 69.9% 45.6% 56.1% 53.4% 60.6% 45.7% 2009 17/19 0.7 4.3 61.7% 54.9% 39.8% 40.4% 51.9% 49.0% 45.3%
28 2008 45/49 3.3 6.3 61.4% 67.4% 43.0% 56.0% 51.2% 57.9% 47.5% 2010 14/17 1.0 5.9 63.1% 54.9% 38.3% 36.0% 51.1% 48.7% 40.7%
29 2009 34/37 4.0 5.5 60.2% 67.0% 45.7% 55.9% 48.6% 58.9% 45.1% 2011 5/5 0.6 7.4 57.0% 54.3% 32.2% 39.3% 42.9% 44.3% 43.1%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 3/3 1.3 4.3 57.7% 58.0% 43.3% 62.4% 58.3% 51.6% 45.0%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 2/4 1.0 5.0 63.2% 53.6% 39.6% 56.1% 46.5% 48.6% 47.0%
Career — 222/648 3.5 4.6 61.5% 69.3% 47.2% 56.4% 51.8% 60.8% 47.1% — 104/246 0.8 4.7 62.2% 55.9% 41.2% 45.2% 50.0% 50.2% 42.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Amélie Mauresmo Maria Elena Camerin
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1995 1488 98.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1996 1523 102.5 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.20 1–1 — — +0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1997 1556 126.4 — — — — -24 +36 — 48.0% -0.08 1–4 (20%) 1–2 (33%) 97.2 -0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1998 1729 146.0 — — — — -83 0 -114 51.2% +0.12 5–3 (63%) 5–4 (56%) 107.0 -0.59 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1999 1912 159.1 — — — — -27 -138 — 61.2% +0.73 12–5 (71%) 5–5 (50%) 109.0 +1.67 2001 1546 108.1 — — — — — +58 — 56.0% +0.12 1–2 (33%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.85
20 2000 1907 163.5 — — — — -30 +17 — 64.6% +1.38 5–7 (42%) 4–7 (36%) 93.9 -1.71 2002 1525 104.8 — — — — +9 +20 — 35.7% -0.68 2–2 (50%) — — +0.88
21 2001 2023 167.1 — — — — -34 +99 -402 70.7% +1.41 14–3 (82%) 10–3 (77%) 113.0 -2.74 2003 1495 108.8 +1.20 -0.47 0.973 50.2% +30 -5 — 38.5% -0.62 0–4 (0%) 2–1 (67%) 95.3 +0.46
22 2002 2062 162.6 — — — — +32 -20 -255 74.0% +1.75 6–7 (46%) 10–5 (67%) 98.8 -0.13 2004 1663 123.4 -1.01 -0.43 0.934 48.6% +23 -138 -150 49.0% -0.09 9–3 (75%) 3–3 (50%) 107.2 -0.10
23 2003 2065 163.0 +5.99 +3.35 1.388 56.1% +3 +92 — 69.4% +1.11 13–5 (72%) 13–2 (87%) 108.6 -2.28 2005 1564 109.3 -3.27 -1.94 0.669 41.3% +36 -101 -92 36.8% -0.65 4–6 (40%) 1–6 (14%) 94.3 +1.00
24 2004 2178 168.3 +7.28 +5.47 1.468 57.6% +1 +37 -262 78.5% +2.20 14–6 (70%) 8–5 (62%) 104.3 -0.48 2006 1611 121.4 -1.81 -0.26 0.940 49.0% +12 -112 -120 49.5% -0.03 5–6 (45%) 2–2 (50%) 99.2 +0.09
25 2005 2133 167.1 +5.80 +3.65 1.286 55.4% +23 +95 -185 72.0% +1.48 10–6 (63%) 7–2 (78%) 102.5 -0.83 2007 1547 119.6 -2.46 -0.09 0.897 47.4% +36 -41 — 39.1% -0.94 3–7 (30%) 4–3 (57%) 97.9 -0.88
26 2006 2166 170.3 +5.44 +4.78 1.215 54.1% +18 +5 -62 70.5% +1.49 15–4 (79%) 8–3 (73%) 108.7 -3.85 2008 1513 107.2 -3.15 -3.06 0.768 44.3% +74 -63 — 39.5% -0.95 1–5 (17%) 2–0 — -0.17
27 2007 1973 149.7 +4.23 +2.32 1.159 53.0% +81 +133 +141 63.4% +1.04 6–9 (40%) 6–8 (43%) 89.6 -1.04 2009 1476 106.2 -4.26 +0.53 0.887 47.3% +48 -10 -46 33.3% -0.96 2–5 (29%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.07
28 2008 1820 135.6 +2.15 +2.79 1.128 52.5% +25 +198 +234 56.9% +0.66 14–8 (64%) 8–9 (47%) 94.5 +0.52 2010 1496 96.3 -4.40 -1.63 0.794 44.8% +59 -78 — 34.1% -1.44 5–2 (71%) — — +0.60
29 2009 1873 146.4 +3.25 +2.00 1.095 52.0% +15 +92 +120 61.4% +0.83 12–4 (75%) 5–5 (50%) 103.7 -1.60 2011 1492 104.5 -2.78 -0.88 0.774 43.8% — -65 — 27.3% -2.27 0–1 — — -0.65
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1500 108.0 -0.75 +0.30 0.931 48.5% — — — 33.3% -0.83 — 0–1 — -0.27
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1520 103.4 -0.44 -2.36 0.915 47.9% — -33 — 50.0% -0.30 1–1 1–1 — -0.06
Career — 2226 166.5 +4.45 +3.42 1.200 53.8% +5 +46 -86 66.9% +1.23 128–73 (64%) 90–60 (60%) 108.0 -2.04 — 1668 116.9 -2.74 -0.75 0.863 46.8% +31 -52 -105 41.9% -0.58 33–44 (43%) 18–20 (47%) 98.0 +0.68

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.