H2H data updated: 2026-07-25 23:01 UTC
Amélie Mauresmo vs Maria Elena Camerin H2H: 1-0
Amélie Mauresmo holds a 1–0 lead over Maria Elena Camerin in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Amélie Mauresmo leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Amélie Mauresmo won the 2004 Athens Olympics third round 6-0 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 47
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 44
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 18, 2004* | Athens Olympics | Olympics | R32 | Hard | Amélie Mauresmo | 6-0 6-1 | Maria Elena Camerin | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amélie Mauresmo | #21 | #1 | 4,992 | 2,225 | 463 | 185 | 71.5% | 2 | 6 | 1 | 15 | 1 | 25 |
| Maria Elena Camerin | #817 | #41 | 774 | 1,667 | 98 | 148 | 39.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Amélie Mauresmo | Maria Elena Camerin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #250 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1996 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #180 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1997 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #100 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1998 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #29 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1999 | 32–14 | 69.6% | #10 | 1,911 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #112 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2000 | 26–13 | 66.7% | #16 | 1,907 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #123 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2001 | 43–12 | 78.2% | #9 | 2,022 | 0 | 6 | 2003 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #100 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2002 | 45–15 | 75.0% | #6 | 2,061 | 0 | 8 | 2004 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #43 | 1,663 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2003 | 45–17 | 72.6% | #4 | 2,065 | 0 | 10 | 2005 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #99 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2004 | 61–12 | 83.6% | #2 | 2,178 | 0 | 15 | 2006 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #50 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2005 | 53–16 | 76.8% | #3 | 2,133 | 0 | 19 | 2007 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #100 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2006 | 50–14 | 78.1% | #3 | 2,165 | 2 | 23 | 2008 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #104 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2007 | 27–14 | 65.9% | #18 | 1,972 | 2 | 24 | 2009 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #114 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2008 | 30–19 | 61.2% | #24 | 1,820 | 2 | 24 | 2010 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #111 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2009 | 25–12 | 67.6% | #21 | 1,872 | 2 | 25 | 2011 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #177 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #168 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #192 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |