H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:30 UTC
Ana Bogdan vs Aleksandra Krunic H2H: 0-1
Aleksandra Krunic holds a 1–0 lead over Ana Bogdan in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Aleksandra Krunic leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Aleksandra Krunic won the 2021 Cluj-Napoca 1 fourth round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ROU
Age 33
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
SRB
Age 33
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 12, 2024 | Osaka | WTA 250 | Q1 | Hard | Ana Bogdan | 6-1 6-2 | Aleksandra Krunic | Match data |
| Aug 6, 2021* | Cluj-Napoca 1 | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Aleksandra Krunic | 6-3 6-3 | Ana Bogdan | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ana Bogdan | #448 | #39 | 1,214 | 1,830 | 95 | 114 | 45.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Aleksandra Krunic | #470 | #39 | 1,210 | 1,771 | 86 | 117 | 42.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ana Bogdan | Aleksandra Krunic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #223 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #165 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #151 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #209 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #87 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2015 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #150 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #108 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2016 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #130 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #144 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2017 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #111 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 20–13 | 60.6% | #54 | 1,752 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2018 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #76 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #55 | 1,728 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2019 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #98 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #163 | 1,561 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2020 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #92 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2021 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #113 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #128 | 1,645 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2022 | 18–10 | 64.3% | #56 | 1,781 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #115 | 1,636 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2023 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #69 | 1,767 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2024 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #114 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 | 2024 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #286 | 1,605 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2025 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #448 | 1,608 | 0 | 2 | 2025 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #468 | 1,567 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #448 | 1,595 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |