H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Ana Bogdan vs Anastasija Sevastova H2H: 2-2
Ana Bogdan and Anastasija Sevastova are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Anastasija Sevastova leads 2–1 on clay, while Ana Bogdan leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anastasija Sevastova won the 2021 Madrid second round 6-0 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ROU
Age 33
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
LAT
Age 36
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 2021* | Madrid | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Anastasija Sevastova | 6-0 6-3 | Ana Bogdan | Match data |
| Feb 15, 2021* | Phillip Island Trophy | WTA 250 | R64 | Hard | Ana Bogdan | 4-6 6-3 6-3 | Anastasija Sevastova | Match data |
| Jul 18, 2019* | Bucharest | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Anastasija Sevastova | 5-7 7-6(4) 7-5 | Ana Bogdan | Match data |
| Jul 22, 2017* | Bucharest | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Ana Bogdan | 6-1 6-3 | Anastasija Sevastova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ana Bogdan | #448 | #39 | 1,214 | 1,830 | 95 | 114 | 45.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Anastasija Sevastova | #293 | #11 | 3,366 | 1,946 | 207 | 175 | 54.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ana Bogdan | Anastasija Sevastova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #261 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #79 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 22–15 | 59.5% | #45 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #209 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #98 | 1,628 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2015 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #150 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #184 | 1,610 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2016 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #130 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #148 | 1,622 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2017 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #111 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2018 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #76 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #113 | 1,654 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2019 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #98 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #34 | 1,715 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2020 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #92 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #16 | 1,820 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2021 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #113 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 42–21 | 66.7% | #11 | 1,909 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2022 | 18–10 | 64.3% | #56 | 1,781 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #27 | 1,759 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2023 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #69 | 1,767 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #54 | 1,649 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 2024 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #114 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #70 | 1,739 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | 2025 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #448 | 1,608 | 0 | 2 | 2022 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #680 | 1,722 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #448 | 1,595 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #481 | 1,728 | 0 | 4 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #188 | 1,730 | 0 | 4 |