H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:30 UTC
Ana Bogdan vs Shuai Peng H2H: 1-0
Ana Bogdan holds a 1–0 lead over Shuai Peng in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ana Bogdan leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ana Bogdan won the 2018 Taipei third round 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ROU
Age 33
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CHN
Age 40
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 1, 2018* | Taipei | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Ana Bogdan | 6-4 6-1 | Shuai Peng | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ana Bogdan | #448 | #39 | 1,214 | 1,830 | 95 | 114 | 45.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Shuai Peng | #820 | #14 | 2,825 | 1,890 | 300 | 258 | 53.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ana Bogdan | Shuai Peng | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #518 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #366 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #221 | 1,455 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #80 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #36 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #55 | 1,727 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #209 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #45 | 1,737 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2015 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #150 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #40 | 1,706 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2016 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #130 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #46 | 1,770 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2017 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #111 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 15–13 | 53.6% | #72 | 1,742 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2018 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #76 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 48–23 | 67.6% | #17 | 1,817 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2019 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #98 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #40 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2020 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #92 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #42 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2021 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #113 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 28–22 | 56.0% | #21 | 1,743 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2022 | 18–10 | 64.3% | #56 | 1,781 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #137 | 1,698 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2023 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #69 | 1,767 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #84 | 1,711 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2024 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #114 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #27 | 1,815 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2025 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #448 | 1,608 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #125 | 1,741 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #448 | 1,595 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #109 | 1,679 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #117 | 1,636 | 0 | 2 |