H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Ana Ivanovic vs Amélie Mauresmo H2H: 2-6

Amélie Mauresmo holds a 6–2 lead over Ana Ivanovic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Amélie Mauresmo leads 5–1 on hard courts, while Ana Ivanovic leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Amélie Mauresmo won the 2009 Brisbane quarterfinal 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Ana Ivanovic
SRB Age 38 Right-Handed 184 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2 – 6
8 main draw meetings
Amélie Mauresmo
FRA Age 47 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 10, 2009* Brisbane WTA 500 QF Hard Amélie Mauresmo #23 6-3 6-2 Ana Ivanovic #5 Match data
Jul 4, 2006* Wimbledon Grand Slam R16 Grass Amélie Mauresmo #1 6-3 6-4 Ana Ivanovic #22 Match data
Mar 24, 2006* Miami WTA 1000 R16 Hard Amélie Mauresmo #1 7-5 6-2 Ana Ivanovic #16 Match data
Jan 13, 2006* Sydney WTA 500 R16 Hard Ana Ivanovic #21 6-3 7-5 Amélie Mauresmo #3 Match data
May 28, 2005* Roland Garros Grand Slam R32 Clay Ana Ivanovic #31 6-4 3-6 6-4 Amélie Mauresmo #3 Match data
Mar 28, 2005* Miami WTA 1000 QF Hard Amélie Mauresmo #2 6-1 6-4 Ana Ivanovic #52 Match data
Feb 25, 2005* Doha WTA 500 R16 Hard Amélie Mauresmo #2 2-6 6-2 6-4 Ana Ivanovic #61 Match data
Jan 22, 2005* Australian Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Amélie Mauresmo #2 6-2 7-5 Ana Ivanovic #82 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Ana Ivanovic #63 #1 6,912 2,095 419 213 66.3% 1 3 2 7 2 15
Amélie Mauresmo #21 #1 4,992 2,217 458 183 71.5% 2 6 1 15 1 25

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ana Ivanovic Amélie Mauresmo
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1995 0–1 0.0% #250 1,488 0 0
16 2004 3–4 42.9% #101 1,544 0 0 1996 2–2 50.0% #180 1,522 0 0
17 2005 32–14 69.6% #16 1,847 0 1 1997 4–6 40.0% #100 1,555 0 0
18 2006 36–18 66.7% #14 1,900 0 2 1998 20–18 52.6% #29 1,729 0 0
19 2007 49–17 74.2% #4 2,034 0 5 1999 32–14 69.6% #10 1,914 0 1
20 2008 38–16 70.4% #5 1,975 1 8 2000 26–12 68.4% #16 1,932 0 2
21 2009 22–14 61.1% #21 1,825 1 8 2001 43–12 78.2% #9 2,029 0 6
22 2010 33–18 64.7% #17 1,938 1 10 2002 45–15 75.0% #6 2,060 0 8
23 2011 32–20 61.5% #22 1,877 1 11 2003 45–17 72.6% #4 2,061 0 10
24 2012 33–18 64.7% #13 1,872 1 11 2004 56–11 83.6% #2 2,175 0 15
25 2013 38–23 62.3% #16 1,855 1 11 2005 53–16 76.8% #3 2,127 0 19
26 2014 59–18 76.6% #5 2,019 1 15 2006 50–14 78.1% #3 2,135 2 23
27 2015 29–19 60.4% #16 1,857 1 15 2007 27–14 65.9% #18 1,960 2 24
28 2016 15–14 51.7% #63 1,702 1 15 2008 30–19 61.2% #24 1,815 2 24
29 — — — — — — — 2009 25–12 67.6% #21 1,871 2 25