H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Ana Ivanovic vs Maria Kirilenko H2H: 3-2

Ana Ivanovic holds a 3–2 lead over Maria Kirilenko in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Ana Ivanovic leads 3–1 on hard courts, while Maria Kirilenko leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Ana Ivanovic won the 2012 Dubai fourth round 6-2 7-6(4).

SRB Age 38 Right-Handed 184 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3 2
5 main draw meetings
RUS Age 39 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 24, 2012* Dubai WTA 500 R16 Hard Ana Ivanovic #18 6-2 7-6(4) Maria Kirilenko #22 Match data
Sep 30, 2011* Tokyo WTA 1000 R16 Hard Maria Kirilenko #27 6-3 6-1 Ana Ivanovic #21 Match data
Aug 11, 2007* Los Angeles WTA 500 QF Hard Ana Ivanovic #5 6-4 6-4 Maria Kirilenko #35 Match data
Feb 3, 2006* Tokyo WTA 1000 R16 Carpet Maria Kirilenko #23 6-4 6-4 Ana Ivanovic #20 Match data
Jan 20, 2005* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Ana Ivanovic #82 6-1 6-1 Maria Kirilenko #105 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Ana Ivanovic #63 #1 6,912 2,095 419 213 66.3% 1 3 2 7 2 15
Maria Kirilenko #947 #10 3,471 1,910 282 228 55.3% 0 0 0 2 4 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ana Ivanovic Maria Kirilenko
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2002 0–3 0.0% #373 1,479 0 0
16 2004 3–4 42.9% #101 1,544 0 0 2003 5–5 50.0% #124 1,522 0 0
17 2005 32–14 69.6% #16 1,847 0 1 2004 8–9 47.1% #107 1,575 0 0
18 2006 36–18 66.7% #14 1,900 0 2 2005 29–21 58.0% #25 1,741 0 1
19 2007 49–17 74.2% #4 2,034 0 5 2006 23–25 47.9% #30 1,656 0 1
20 2008 38–16 70.4% #5 1,975 1 8 2007 28–26 51.9% #25 1,739 0 2
21 2009 22–14 61.1% #21 1,825 1 8 2008 34–22 60.7% #29 1,722 0 5
22 2010 33–18 64.7% #17 1,938 1 10 2009 21–24 46.7% #62 1,719 0 5
23 2011 32–20 61.5% #22 1,877 1 11 2010 37–23 61.7% #20 1,827 0 5
24 2012 33–18 64.7% #13 1,872 1 11 2011 29–23 55.8% #28 1,816 0 5
25 2013 38–23 62.3% #16 1,855 1 11 2012 29–20 59.2% #14 1,775 0 5
26 2014 59–18 76.6% #5 2,019 1 15 2013 34–18 65.4% #19 1,786 0 6
27 2015 29–19 60.4% #16 1,857 1 15 2014 5–9 35.7% #187 1,698 0 6
28 2016 15–14 51.7% #63 1,702 1 15