H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Ana Ivanovic vs Sofia Arvidsson H2H: 4-0
Ana Ivanovic holds a 4–0 lead over Sofia Arvidsson in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Ana Ivanovic leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Ana Ivanovic won the 2012 US Open second round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SRB
Age 38
Right-Handed
184 cm / 6'0"
H2H
4
–
0
4 main draw meetings
SWE
Age 42
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 30, 2012* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Ana Ivanovic | 6-2 6-2 | Sofia Arvidsson | Match data |
| Jun 17, 2010* | 's Hertogenbosch | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Ana Ivanovic | 4-6 6-0 6-1 | Sofia Arvidsson | Match data |
| May 27, 2008* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Ana Ivanovic | 6-2 7-5 | Sofia Arvidsson | Match data |
| May 29, 2007* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Ana Ivanovic | 6-2 6-0 | Sofia Arvidsson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ana Ivanovic | #63 | #1 | 6,912 | 2,095 | 419 | 213 | 66.3% | 1 | 3 | 2 | 7 | 2 | 15 |
| Sofia Arvidsson | #320 | #29 | 1,380 | 1,775 | 113 | 154 | 42.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ana Ivanovic | Sofia Arvidsson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2004 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #101 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2005 | 32–14 | 69.6% | #16 | 1,847 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #437 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2006 | 36–18 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,900 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #144 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2007 | 49–17 | 74.2% | #4 | 2,034 | 0 | 5 | 2003 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #104 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2008 | 38–16 | 70.4% | #5 | 1,975 | 1 | 8 | 2004 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #213 | 1,434 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2009 | 22–14 | 61.1% | #21 | 1,825 | 1 | 8 | 2005 | 13–8 | 61.9% | #67 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2010 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #17 | 1,938 | 1 | 10 | 2006 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #62 | 1,537 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2011 | 32–20 | 61.5% | #22 | 1,877 | 1 | 11 | 2007 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #98 | 1,508 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2012 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #13 | 1,872 | 1 | 11 | 2008 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #56 | 1,519 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2013 | 38–23 | 62.3% | #16 | 1,855 | 1 | 11 | 2009 | 0–8 | 0.0% | #139 | 1,443 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2014 | 59–18 | 76.6% | #5 | 2,019 | 1 | 15 | 2010 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #53 | 1,545 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2015 | 29–19 | 60.4% | #16 | 1,857 | 1 | 15 | 2011 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #78 | 1,627 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2016 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #63 | 1,702 | 1 | 15 | 2012 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #41 | 1,753 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 6–18 | 25.0% | #120 | 1,597 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #263 | 1,581 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #320 | 1,568 | 0 | 2 |