H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:30 UTC
Ana Konjuh vs Jana Cepelova H2H: 1-0
Ana Konjuh holds a 1–0 lead over Jana Cepelova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ana Konjuh leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Ana Konjuh won the 2017 Prague third round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 28
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
SVK
Age 33
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 3, 2017* | Prague | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Ana Konjuh | 6-2 6-2 | Jana Cepelova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ana Konjuh | #647 | #20 | 1,830 | 1,786 | 84 | 80 | 51.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Jana Cepelova | #894 | #50 | 1,074 | 1,685 | 55 | 91 | 37.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ana Konjuh | Jana Cepelova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2014 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #93 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2015 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #82 | 1,658 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2016 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #47 | 1,688 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #201 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2017 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #44 | 1,716 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #111 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2018 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #385 | 1,686 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #76 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1282 | 1,644 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #56 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #147 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2021 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #67 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #100 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2022 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #108 | 1,642 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 8–20 | 28.6% | #108 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2023 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #407 | 1,583 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #188 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #158 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #647 | 1,464 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |