H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:30 UTC
Ana Konjuh vs Marina Erakovic H2H: 2-0
Ana Konjuh holds a 2–0 lead over Marina Erakovic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Ana Konjuh leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ana Konjuh won the 2017 Stanford third round 6-3 1-0 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 28
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
NZL
Age 38
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 3, 2017* | Stanford | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Ana Konjuh | 6-3 1-0 (ret.) | Marina Erakovic | Match data |
| Jun 25, 2014* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Ana Konjuh | 6-3 4-6 6-0 | Marina Erakovic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ana Konjuh | #647 | #20 | 1,830 | 1,786 | 84 | 80 | 51.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Marina Erakovic | #827 | #39 | 1,392 | 1,701 | 105 | 131 | 44.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ana Konjuh | Marina Erakovic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2014 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #93 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2015 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #82 | 1,658 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #213 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2016 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #47 | 1,688 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2017 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #44 | 1,716 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #153 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2018 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #385 | 1,686 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #66 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1282 | 1,644 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #227 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #333 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2021 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #67 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #61 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2022 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #108 | 1,642 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #66 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2023 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #407 | 1,583 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #46 | 1,673 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #76 | 1,609 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #647 | 1,464 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #135 | 1,543 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #106 | 1,625 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #197 | 1,551 | 0 | 1 |