H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:30 UTC
Ana Konjuh vs Urszula Radwanska H2H: 2-0
Ana Konjuh holds a 2–0 lead over Urszula Radwanska in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Ana Konjuh leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ana Konjuh won the 2021 Nur-Sultan third round 7-6(6) 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 28
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
POL
Age 35
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 2021* | Nur-Sultan | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Ana Konjuh | 7-6(6) 6-1 | Urszula Radwanska | Match data |
| Jan 20, 2016* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Ana Konjuh | 0-6 6-4 6-3 | Urszula Radwanska | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ana Konjuh | #647 | #20 | 1,830 | 1,786 | 84 | 80 | 51.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Urszula Radwanska | #493 | #29 | 1,565 | 1,747 | 99 | 130 | 43.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ana Konjuh | Urszula Radwanska | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #313 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 2014 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #93 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #252 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2015 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #82 | 1,658 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #129 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2016 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #47 | 1,688 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #70 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2017 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #44 | 1,716 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #193 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2018 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #385 | 1,686 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #105 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1282 | 1,644 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #31 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #40 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2021 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #67 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #179 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2022 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #108 | 1,642 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #94 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2023 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #407 | 1,583 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #257 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #647 | 1,464 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #231 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 |