H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Anabel Medina Garrigues vs Gisela Dulko H2H: 2-3

Gisela Dulko holds a 3–2 lead over Anabel Medina Garrigues in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Anabel Medina Garrigues leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Gisela Dulko leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Gisela Dulko won the 2011 Acapulco semifinal 6-0 6-2.

ESP Age 43 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2 3
5 main draw meetings
ARG Age 41 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 26, 2011* Acapulco WTA 250 SF Clay Gisela Dulko #73 6-0 6-2 Anabel Medina Garrigues #92 Match data
Jan 16, 2010* Hobart WTA 250 QF Hard Anabel Medina Garrigues #26 6-1 5-7 6-1 Gisela Dulko #36 Match data
May 4, 2008* Fes WTA 250 F Clay Gisela Dulko #62 7-6(2) 7-6(5) Anabel Medina Garrigues #34 Match data
Aug 26, 2005* New Haven WTA 500 R16 Hard Anabel Medina Garrigues #33 6-0 6-7(10) 6-4 Gisela Dulko #28 Match data
Feb 24, 2005* Doha WTA 500 R32 Hard Gisela Dulko #33 6-1 1-6 6-4 Anabel Medina Garrigues #42 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Anabel Medina Garrigues #741 #16 2,505 1,852 310 275 53.0% 0 0 0 3 8 11
Gisela Dulko #305 #26 1,695 1,798 192 179 51.8% 0 0 0 1 3 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anabel Medina Garrigues Gisela Dulko
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2001 0–1 0.0% #188 1,488 0 0
17 2000 2–5 28.6% #109 1,494 0 0 2002 4–3 57.1% #154 1,528 0 0
18 2001 16–20 44.4% #66 1,563 0 1 2003 5–7 41.7% #125 1,516 0 0
19 2002 9–3 75.0% #116 1,687 0 1 2004 22–18 55.0% #33 1,713 0 0
20 2003 13–12 52.0% #71 1,613 0 1 2005 32–23 58.2% #26 1,726 0 0
21 2004 25–22 53.2% #39 1,716 0 2 2006 16–23 41.0% #59 1,573 0 0
22 2005 28–23 54.9% #33 1,747 0 4 2007 29–23 55.8% #37 1,702 0 2
23 2006 34–24 58.6% #27 1,690 0 6 2008 18–20 47.4% #51 1,658 0 3
24 2007 25–22 53.2% #34 1,694 0 7 2009 28–20 58.3% #36 1,734 0 3
25 2008 41–24 63.1% #22 1,833 0 8 2010 21–21 50.0% #48 1,686 0 3
26 2009 33–26 55.9% #27 1,683 0 9 2011 15–15 50.0% #67 1,650 0 4
27 2010 18–25 41.9% #71 1,565 0 9 2012 2–5 28.6% #305 1,604 0 4
28 2011 35–21 62.5% #27 1,774 0 11
29 2012 23–25 47.9% #50 1,629 0 11
30 2013 8–19 29.6% #100 1,553 0 11
31 2014 0–4 0.0% #452 1,501 0 11