H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC
Anabel Medina Garrigues holds a 1–0 lead over Jing-Jing Lu in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Anabel Medina Garrigues leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anabel Medina Garrigues won the 2009 China Open first round 3-6 7-5 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anabel Medina Garrigues | 3-6 7-5 7-5 | Jing-Jing Lu | Match data | Oct 5, 2009 | R64 | China Open | Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 | Hard |
Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anabel Medina Garrigues | #741 | #16 | 2,505 | 1,834 | 310 | 278 | 52.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 11 |
| Jing-Jing Lu | #797 | #159 | 365 | 1,549 | 4 | 13 | 23.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Anabel Medina Garrigues | Jing-Jing Lu | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2000 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #109 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #237 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #66 | 1,562 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #225 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | 9–3 | 75.0% | #116 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #247 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 2003 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #71 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #215 | 1,441 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #39 | 1,708 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #258 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #33 | 1,744 | 0 | 4 | 2017 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #163 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #27 | 1,689 | 0 | 6 | 2018 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #292 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #34 | 1,682 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2008 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #22 | 1,819 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2009 | 33–26 | 55.9% | #27 | 1,683 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #71 | 1,567 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #27 | 1,783 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #50 | 1,618 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 8–19 | 29.6% | #100 | 1,541 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #452 | 1,491 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Anabel Medina Garrigues | Jing-Jing Lu | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | ||
| 2000 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2001 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 14 | 12 | 26 | 53.8% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2009 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2002 | 9 | 3 | 12 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2003 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 12 | 10 | 22 | 54.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2004 | 12 | 12 | 24 | 50.0% | 10 | 8 | 18 | 55.6% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2016 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2005 | 12 | 15 | 27 | 44.4% | 15 | 5 | 20 | 75.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2017 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2006 | 14 | 14 | 28 | 50.0% | 17 | 7 | 24 | 70.8% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2018 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2007 | 9 | 14 | 23 | 39.1% | 15 | 5 | 20 | 75.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2008 | 21 | 15 | 36 | 58.3% | 18 | 7 | 25 | 72.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2009 | 19 | 18 | 37 | 51.4% | 10 | 5 | 15 | 66.7% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 4 | 13 | 17 | 23.5% | 14 | 10 | 24 | 58.3% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 12 | 12 | 24 | 50.0% | 23 | 8 | 31 | 74.2% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 8 | 13 | 21 | 38.1% | 13 | 9 | 22 | 59.1% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 2 | 8 | 10 | 20.0% | 5 | 8 | 13 | 38.5% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 125 | 149 | 274 | 45.6% | 168 | 99 | 267 | 62.9% | 15 | 21 | 36 | 41.7% | 2 | 9 | 11 | 18.2% | Career | 4 | 13 | 17 | 23.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 326/508 of Anabel Medina Garrigues's and 17/17 of Jing-Jing Lu's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Anabel Medina Garrigues | Jing-Jing Lu | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% |
| 2004 | 6/48 | 1.8 | 0.7 | 78.0% | 58.3% | 59.5% | 62.0% | 59.9% | 58.6% | 46.3% | 2008 | 2/2 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 54.8% | 68.8% | 49.9% | 83.3% | 70.0% | 60.1% | 36.8% |
| 2005 | 5/51 | 2.2 | 1.8 | 64.4% | 56.8% | 36.3% | 52.9% | 45.1% | 49.6% | 48.6% | 2009 | 2/2 | 1.5 | 4.5 | 58.9% | 57.0% | 35.7% | 33.3% | 39.7% | 48.3% | 43.8% |
| 2006 | 24/58 | 0.8 | 1.8 | 61.8% | 56.1% | 49.6% | 49.2% | 58.3% | 53.5% | 44.6% | 2010 | 2/2 | 1.5 | 3.5 | 49.3% | 52.5% | 38.6% | 43.8% | 25.0% | 46.2% | 33.5% |
| 2007 | 42/47 | 1.2 | 1.7 | 62.3% | 63.3% | 47.4% | 49.5% | 51.9% | 57.3% | 44.3% | 2011 | 2/2 | 1.0 | 4.0 | 59.2% | 44.1% | 30.6% | 43.3% | 10.0% | 36.9% | 37.7% |
| 2008 | 51/66 | 1.1 | 1.0 | 67.2% | 61.0% | 52.7% | 53.2% | 53.7% | 58.3% | 47.3% | 2016 | 1/1 | 2.0 | 9.0 | 52.9% | 54.5% | 44.9% | 56.3% | 42.9% | 50.0% | 49.4% |
| 2009 | 47/59 | 1.1 | 1.7 | 65.4% | 63.4% | 45.4% | 46.8% | 51.9% | 56.9% | 46.0% | 2017 | 5/5 | 1.2 | 5.6 | 54.9% | 59.2% | 39.2% | 47.6% | 36.1% | 50.3% | 42.1% |
| 2010 | 40/43 | 1.1 | 1.8 | 63.9% | 59.5% | 46.7% | 50.2% | 45.9% | 54.8% | 46.0% | 2018 | 3/3 | 0.3 | 2.7 | 65.4% | 53.7% | 43.5% | 46.0% | 64.3% | 50.3% | 40.5% |
| 2011 | 44/56 | 0.7 | 1.0 | 66.7% | 62.3% | 49.9% | 48.2% | 55.5% | 58.3% | 49.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 46/49 | 1.5 | 1.3 | 64.2% | 60.7% | 46.8% | 54.9% | 42.5% | 55.9% | 42.8% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 19/27 | 1.9 | 2.3 | 63.2% | 61.4% | 43.9% | 45.3% | 45.3% | 55.3% | 44.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 2/4 | 0.5 | 2.0 | 65.9% | 56.8% | 23.0% | 63.9% | 25.0% | 45.3% | 36.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 326/588 | 1.2 | 1.5 | 64.9% | 61.1% | 48.0% | 50.5% | 50.6% | 56.5% | 45.8% | Career | 17/17 | 1.2 | 4.3 | 56.9% | 56.3% | 40.1% | 49.4% | 41.5% | 49.1% | 40.3% |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Anabel Medina Garrigues | Jing-Jing Lu | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule |
| 2000 | 1495 | 109.4 | — | — | — | — | — | +46 | — | 37.5% | -0.88 | 0–2 | 0–1 | — | -0.45 | 2008 | 1504 | 102.9 | +1.75 | -1.27 | 0.922 | 48.8% | — | — | — | 50.0% | 0.00 | — | 1–0 | — | +0.16 |
| 2001 | 1563 | 117.3 | — | — | — | — | -85 | +93 | — | 48.8% | +0.08 | 4–10 (29%) | 2–5 (29%) | 93.0 | +0.66 | 2009 | 1482 | 101.3 | -1.06 | -0.30 | 0.847 | 46.0% | — | — | — | 20.0% | -1.40 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.12 |
| 2002 | 1688 | 129.0 | — | — | — | — | -48 | — | — | 75.0% | +1.87 | 2–0 | 0–1 | — | +0.26 | 2010 | 1461 | 97.9 | -2.41 | -2.92 | 0.622 | 39.7% | — | — | — | 20.0% | -3.00 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.14 |
| 2003 | 1613 | 108.3 | — | — | — | — | 0 | +20 | — | 49.2% | +0.02 | 6–3 (67%) | 3–2 (60%) | 102.6 | +1.71 | 2011 | 1442 | 94.0 | -1.58 | -0.65 | 0.597 | 38.2% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -5.00 | — | — | — | -0.03 |
| 2004 | 1708 | 129.8 | +1.41 | +0.60 | 1.118 | 51.8% | -57 | +9 | -121 | 53.7% | +0.07 | 6–8 (43%) | 2–3 (40%) | 98.9 | -1.46 | 2016 | 1474 | 103.1 | -3.35 | +1.52 | 0.988 | 49.7% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -0.33 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.02 |
| 2005 | 1745 | 135.2 | -1.51 | +1.69 | 0.965 | 49.2% | -99 | +158 | -209 | 53.6% | +0.26 | 6–6 (50%) | 5–9 (36%) | 98.7 | -2.02 | 2017 | 1535 | 104.6 | -3.20 | -1.74 | 0.847 | 46.2% | +19 | — | — | 38.5% | -1.38 | 2–1 (67%) | 1–0 | — | +0.26 |
| 2006 | 1689 | 128.8 | -1.72 | -0.23 | 0.958 | 49.1% | -75 | +209 | -104 | 55.6% | +0.38 | 13–6 (68%) | 4–3 (57%) | 104.3 | +2.64 | 2018 | 1514 | 101.1 | -2.41 | -1.84 | 0.814 | 45.4% | +16 | — | — | 28.6% | -1.29 | 1–0 | — | — | +0.35 |
| 2007 | 1682 | 135.1 | +0.95 | +0.79 | 1.039 | 50.5% | -106 | +315 | — | 53.6% | +0.32 | 7–11 (39%) | 8–3 (73%) | 98.9 | +0.01 | 2023 | 1502 | 98.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2008 | 1820 | 137.4 | +2.98 | +3.19 | 1.133 | 52.6% | -59 | +96 | -278 | 58.5% | +0.61 | 11–11 (50%) | 8–9 (47%) | 97.9 | -0.46 | 2024 | 1485 | 98.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2009 | 1684 | 126.3 | +0.93 | +1.02 | 1.069 | 51.3% | -23 | +170 | -48 | 52.7% | +0.20 | 11–6 (65%) | 5–2 (71%) | 104.7 | +2.67 | 2025 | 1479 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 1568 | 122.5 | -1.00 | +1.31 | 1.018 | 50.4% | -21 | +188 | — | 44.7% | -0.10 | 4–8 (33%) | 0–4 (0%) | 91.6 | +0.63 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 1783 | 138.0 | +2.59 | +4.74 | 1.189 | 53.8% | -112 | +101 | — | 61.8% | +0.86 | 2–8 (20%) | 6–7 (46%) | 94.4 | -1.92 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 1619 | 120.1 | +0.13 | -0.99 | 0.970 | 49.5% | -31 | +157 | -55 | 49.1% | +0.03 | 5–9 (36%) | 9–4 (69%) | 97.5 | +1.56 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 1542 | 118.6 | -0.14 | +0.99 | 1.001 | 49.5% | -27 | +153 | -29 | 38.7% | -0.87 | 2–10 (17%) | 2–2 (50%) | 91.4 | -1.16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 1491 | 90.1 | -2.24 | -1.41 | 0.663 | 41.1% | — | — | — | 11.1% | -3.22 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 1834 | 132.6 | +0.82 | +1.48 | 1.053 | 51.0% | -62 | +135 | -114 | 52.6% | +0.21 | 79–99 (44%) | 54–55 (50%) | 94.1 | +0.50 | Career | 1550 | 101.6 | -1.95 | -1.35 | 0.792 | 44.9% | +18 | — | — | 29.3% | -1.71 | 3–4 (43%) | 2–0 | — | +6.00 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Klara Koukalova | 6 | 5 | 11 | Mar 20, 2013 | H2H |
| Marion Bartoli | 3 | 8 | 11 | Jan 16, 2013 | H2H |
| Jelena Jankovic | 1 | 7 | 8 | May 13, 2011 | H2H |
| Tathiana Garbin | 7 | 1 | 8 | Jun 25, 2009 | H2H |
| Flavia Pennetta | 3 | 4 | 7 | Feb 23, 2012 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Su-Wei Hsieh | 0 | 2 | 2 | Oct 12, 2017 | H2H |
| Alisa Kleybanova | 0 | 2 | 2 | Mar 3, 2011 | H2H |
| Fang Ying Xun | 0 | 1 | 1 | Jul 27, 2018 | H2H |
| Kurumi Nara | 1 | 0 | 1 | Jul 26, 2018 | H2H |
| Johanna Larsson | 0 | 1 | 1 | Feb 1, 2018 | H2H |