H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Anabel Medina Garrigues vs Jing-Jing Lu H2H: 1-0
Anabel Medina Garrigues holds a 1–0 lead over Jing-Jing Lu in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Anabel Medina Garrigues leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anabel Medina Garrigues won the 2009 Beijing second round 3-6 7-5 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 43
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CHN
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 7, 2009* | Beijing | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Anabel Medina Garrigues | 3-6 7-5 7-5 | Jing-Jing Lu | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anabel Medina Garrigues | #741 | #16 | 2,505 | 1,852 | 310 | 275 | 53.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 11 |
| Jing-Jing Lu | #797 | #159 | 365 | 1,550 | 4 | 13 | 23.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Anabel Medina Garrigues | Jing-Jing Lu | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2000 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #109 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #237 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #66 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #225 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | 9–3 | 75.0% | #116 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #247 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 2003 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #71 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #215 | 1,441 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #39 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #258 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #33 | 1,747 | 0 | 4 | 2017 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #163 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #27 | 1,690 | 0 | 6 | 2018 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #292 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #34 | 1,694 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2008 | 41–24 | 63.1% | #22 | 1,833 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2009 | 33–26 | 55.9% | #27 | 1,683 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #71 | 1,565 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #27 | 1,774 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #50 | 1,629 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 8–19 | 29.6% | #100 | 1,553 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #452 | 1,501 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |