H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:32 UTC

Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova vs Agnieszka Radwanska H2H: 3-4

Agnieszka Radwanska holds a 4–3 lead over Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Agnieszka Radwanska leads 3–2 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on grass. Most recently, Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova won the 2016 Montreal fourth round 6-4 6-7(4) 6-1.

RUS Age 35 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
3 4
7 main draw meetings
POL Age 37 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 29, 2016* Montreal WTA 1000 R16 Hard Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova #19 6-4 6-7(4) 6-1 Agnieszka Radwanska #4 Match data
Jun 19, 2014* Eastbourne WTA 500 R32 Grass Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova #26 6-4 3-6 7-6(4) Agnieszka Radwanska #4 Match data
Jan 19, 2014* Australian Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Agnieszka Radwanska #5 5-7 6-2 6-2 Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova #30 Match data
Sep 22, 2013* Seoul WTA 250 F Hard Agnieszka Radwanska #4 6-7(6) 6-3 6-4 Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova #32 Match data
Sep 1, 2013* US Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Agnieszka Radwanska #4 6-4 7-6(1) Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova #33 Match data
Mar 14, 2009* Indian Wells WTA 1000 QF Hard Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova #42 7-6(8) 6-4 Agnieszka Radwanska #10 Match data
Jun 28, 2008* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Agnieszka Radwanska #11 6-3 6-2 Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova #137 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova #400 #11 3,590 1,936 415 324 56.2% 0 0 0 8 4 12
Agnieszka Radwanska #74 #2 8,530 2,081 506 237 68.1% 0 5 1 8 6 20

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova Agnieszka Radwanska
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 2006 0–1 0.0% #377 1,497 0 0
15 2007 0–1 0.0% #286 1,494 0 0
16 2008 10–8 55.6% #45 1,592 0 0
17 2009 24–20 54.5% #40 1,701 0 0 2006 11–8 57.9% #61 1,673 0 0
18 2010 39–21 65.0% #21 1,822 0 2 2007 27–19 58.7% #26 1,808 0 1
19 2011 37–21 63.8% #16 1,830 0 3 2008 51–19 72.9% #10 1,926 0 4
20 2012 21–23 47.7% #36 1,716 0 3 2009 44–23 65.7% #10 1,910 0 4
21 2013 33–22 60.0% #26 1,799 0 5 2010 32–18 64.0% #14 1,860 0 4
22 2014 26–20 56.5% #24 1,763 0 7 2011 46–18 71.9% #8 1,979 0 7
23 2015 34–21 61.8% #28 1,867 0 8 2012 59–19 75.6% #4 1,994 0 10
24 2016 23–23 50.0% #27 1,744 0 8 2013 56–20 73.7% #5 1,957 0 13
25 2017 41–23 64.1% #15 1,832 0 11 2014 43–22 66.2% #6 1,872 0 14
26 2018 20–20 50.0% #42 1,805 0 12 2015 50–22 69.4% #5 1,957 0 17
27 2019 22–21 51.2% #31 1,796 0 12 2016 51–18 73.9% #3 1,942 0 20
28 2020 9–8 52.9% #38 1,800 0 12 2017 25–18 58.1% #28 1,812 0 20
29 2021 24–18 57.1% #11 1,826 0 12 2018 11–13 45.8% #74 1,727 0 20
30 2022 2–3 40.0% #367 1,786 0 12
31 2023 14–12 53.8% #58 1,812 0 12
32 2024 25–20 55.6% #30 1,839 0 12
33 2025 11–12 47.8% #47 1,808 0 12
34 2026 0–6 0.0% #400 1,725 0 12