H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova vs Anett Kontaveit H2H: 2-4

Anett Kontaveit holds a 4–2 lead over Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts, while Anett Kontaveit leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Anett Kontaveit won the 2020 Dubai fourth round 7-6(5) 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova
RUS Age 35 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2 – 4
6 main draw meetings
Anett Kontaveit
EST Age 30 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 20, 2020* Dubai WTA 1000 R16 Hard Anett Kontaveit #24 7-6(5) 7-5 Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova #31 Match data
Jan 13, 2020 Adelaide WTA 500 R32 Hard Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova #31 6-2 6-4 Anett Kontaveit #29 Match data
Apr 26, 2019* Stuttgart WTA 500 R16 Clay Anett Kontaveit #15 6-3 6-2 Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova #34 Match data
Apr 28, 2018* Stuttgart WTA 500 QF Clay Anett Kontaveit #31 7-5 6-7(6) 6-4 Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova #27 Match data
Mar 11, 2017* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R64 Hard Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova #21 6-4 6-4 Anett Kontaveit #125 Match data
Sep 3, 2015* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Anett Kontaveit #152 7-5 6-4 Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova #31 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova #400 #11 3,590 1,936 415 324 56.2% 0 0 0 8 4 12
Anett Kontaveit #81 #2 4,721 2,109 205 138 59.8% 0 0 0 3 3 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova Anett Kontaveit
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 2006 0–1 0.0% #377 1,497 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 2007 0–1 0.0% #286 1,494 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 2008 10–8 55.6% #45 1,592 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2009 24–20 54.5% #40 1,701 0 0 2013 0–1 0.0% #249 1,491 0 0
18 2010 39–21 65.0% #21 1,822 0 2 2014 1–5 16.7% #159 1,466 0 0
19 2011 37–21 63.8% #16 1,830 0 3 2015 5–6 45.5% #91 1,517 0 0
20 2012 21–23 47.7% #36 1,716 0 3 2016 13–16 44.8% #112 1,609 0 0
21 2013 33–22 60.0% #26 1,799 0 5 2017 26–19 57.8% #34 1,706 0 1
22 2014 26–20 56.5% #24 1,763 0 7 2018 33–23 58.9% #20 1,832 0 1
23 2015 34–21 61.8% #28 1,867 0 8 2019 24–16 60.0% #26 1,865 0 1
24 2016 23–23 50.0% #27 1,744 0 8 2020 21–11 65.6% #23 1,912 0 1
25 2017 41–23 64.1% #15 1,832 0 11 2021 49–17 74.2% #7 2,049 0 5
26 2018 20–20 50.0% #42 1,805 0 12 2022 29–16 64.4% #17 1,882 0 6
27 2019 22–21 51.2% #31 1,796 0 12 2023 4–8 33.3% #81 1,776 0 6
28 2020 9–8 52.9% #38 1,800 0 12 — — — — — — —
29 2021 24–18 57.1% #11 1,826 0 12 — — — — — — —
30 2022 2–3 40.0% #367 1,786 0 12 — — — — — — —
31 2023 14–12 53.8% #58 1,812 0 12 — — — — — — —
32 2024 25–20 55.6% #30 1,839 0 12 — — — — — — —
33 2025 11–12 47.8% #47 1,808 0 12 — — — — — — —
34 2026 0–6 0.0% #400 1,725 0 12 — — — — — — —