H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova vs Ashleigh Barty H2H: 3-3

Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova and Ashleigh Barty are tied 3–3 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Ashleigh Barty leads 3–2 on hard courts, while Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Ashleigh Barty won the 2020 Adelaide fourth round 4-6 6-3 7-5.

RUS Age 35 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
3 3
6 main draw meetings
AUS Age 30 Right-Handed 166 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 14, 2020 Adelaide WTA 500 R16 Hard Ashleigh Barty #1 4-6 6-3 7-5 Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova #31 Match data
Sep 28, 2018* Wuhan WTA 1000 QF Hard Ashleigh Barty #17 6-2 5-7 6-4 Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova #39 Match data
May 25, 2018* Strasbourg WTA 500 SF Clay Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova #31 6-4 1-0 (ret.) Ashleigh Barty #17 Match data
Oct 31, 2017 Zhuhai WTA Finals RR Hard Ashleigh Barty #20 6-4 6-1 Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova #14 Match data
Aug 29, 2013* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova #33 6-4 6-0 Ashleigh Barty #169 Match data
Mar 2, 2013* Kuala Lumpur WTA 250 QF Hard Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova #29 6-2 6-0 Ashleigh Barty #199 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova #400 #11 3,590 1,936 415 324 56.2% 0 0 0 8 4 12
Ashleigh Barty #1 #1 10,185 2,199 191 70 73.2% 3 3 2 4 3 15

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova Ashleigh Barty
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 2006 0–1 0.0% #377 1,497 0 0
15 2007 0–1 0.0% #286 1,494 0 0
16 2008 10–8 55.6% #45 1,592 0 0 2012 0–4 0.0% #175 1,469 0 0
17 2009 24–20 54.5% #40 1,701 0 0 2013 4–5 44.4% #190 1,519 0 0
18 2010 39–21 65.0% #21 1,822 0 2 2014 1–6 14.3% #223 1,508 0 0
19 2011 37–21 63.8% #16 1,830 0 3
20 2012 21–23 47.7% #36 1,716 0 3 2016 2–1 66.7% #272 1,593 0 0
21 2013 33–22 60.0% #26 1,799 0 5 2017 30–14 68.2% #17 1,888 0 1
22 2014 26–20 56.5% #24 1,763 0 7 2018 40–18 69.0% #15 1,964 0 3
23 2015 34–21 61.8% #28 1,867 0 8 2019 48–12 80.0% #1 2,070 1 7
24 2016 23–23 50.0% #27 1,744 0 8 2020 12–3 80.0% #1 2,082 1 8
25 2017 41–23 64.1% #15 1,832 0 11 2021 43–7 86.0% #1 2,142 2 13
26 2018 20–20 50.0% #42 1,805 0 12 2022 11–0 100.0% #1 2,199 3 15
27 2019 22–21 51.2% #31 1,796 0 12
28 2020 9–8 52.9% #38 1,800 0 12
29 2021 24–18 57.1% #11 1,826 0 12
30 2022 2–3 40.0% #367 1,786 0 12
31 2023 14–12 53.8% #58 1,812 0 12
32 2024 25–20 55.6% #30 1,839 0 12
33 2025 11–12 47.8% #47 1,808 0 12
34 2026 0–6 0.0% #400 1,725 0 12