H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova vs Julia Goerges H2H: 3-4

Julia Goerges holds a 4–3 lead over Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Julia Goerges leads 2–1 on clay, while Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova won the 2019 Stuttgart third round 4-6 6-2 4-0 RET.

RUS Age 35 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
3 4
7 main draw meetings
GER Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 25, 2019* Stuttgart WTA 500 R32 Clay Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova #34 4-6 6-2 4-0 (ret.) Julia Goerges #17 Match data
Jun 23, 2017* Mallorca WTA 250 R16 Grass Julia Goerges #54 6-1 6-2 Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova #17 Match data
Jan 4, 2017* Auckland WTA 250 R32 Hard Julia Goerges #53 6-3 6-4 Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova #27 Match data
Oct 7, 2015* Beijing WTA 1000 R64 Hard Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova #32 6-2 6-4 Julia Goerges #50 Match data
Aug 16, 2012* Cincinnati WTA 1000 R32 Hard Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova #23 6-3 6-0 Julia Goerges #24 Match data
Apr 26, 2012* Stuttgart WTA 500 R32 Clay Julia Goerges #21 5-7 6-3 6-4 Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova #23 Match data
May 7, 2011* Madrid WTA 1000 QF Clay Julia Goerges #27 6-4 6-2 Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova #21 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova #400 #11 3,590 1,936 415 324 56.2% 0 0 0 8 4 12
Julia Goerges #45 #9 3,980 1,940 304 249 55.0% 0 0 1 2 4 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova Julia Goerges
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
2006 0–1 0.0% #377 1,497 0 0 2007 4–5 44.4% #126 1,543 0 0
2007 0–1 0.0% #286 1,494 0 0 2008 6–7 46.2% #108 1,557 0 0
2008 10–8 55.6% #45 1,592 0 0 2009 9–11 45.0% #77 1,588 0 0
2009 24–20 54.5% #40 1,701 0 0 2010 29–22 56.9% #40 1,760 0 1
2010 39–21 65.0% #21 1,822 0 2 2011 36–24 60.0% #21 1,772 0 2
2011 37–21 63.8% #16 1,830 0 3 2012 34–25 57.6% #18 1,751 0 2
2012 21–23 47.7% #36 1,716 0 3 2013 14–27 34.1% #72 1,535 0 2
2013 33–22 60.0% #26 1,799 0 5 2014 15–18 45.5% #74 1,596 0 2
2014 26–20 56.5% #24 1,763 0 7 2015 17–20 45.9% #50 1,612 0 2
2015 34–21 61.8% #28 1,867 0 8 2016 22–20 52.4% #53 1,671 0 2
2016 23–23 50.0% #27 1,744 0 8 2017 42–22 65.6% #14 1,880 0 4
2017 41–23 64.1% #15 1,832 0 11 2018 44–22 66.7% #14 1,861 0 6
2018 20–20 50.0% #42 1,805 0 12 2019 26–20 56.5% #28 1,799 0 7
2019 22–21 51.2% #31 1,796 0 12 2020 6–6 50.0% #45 1,761 0 7
2020 9–8 52.9% #38 1,800 0 12
2021 24–18 57.1% #11 1,826 0 12
2022 2–3 40.0% #367 1,786 0 12
2023 14–12 53.8% #58 1,812 0 12
2024 25–20 55.6% #30 1,839 0 12
2025 11–12 47.8% #47 1,808 0 12
2026 0–6 0.0% #400 1,725 0 12