H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC
Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova vs Ksenia Pervak H2H: 1-1
Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova and Ksenia Pervak are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova leads 1–0 on clay, while Ksenia Pervak leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova won the 2012 Rome second round 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 35
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 35
Left-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 16, 2012* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova | 6-2 6-4 | Ksenia Pervak | Match data |
| Feb 15, 2012* | Doha | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Ksenia Pervak | 1-6 6-2 6-3 | Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova | #400 | #11 | 3,590 | 1,936 | 415 | 324 | 56.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 4 | 12 |
| Ksenia Pervak | #834 | #37 | 1,475 | 1,703 | 53 | 63 | 45.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova | Ksenia Pervak | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #377 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #286 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2008 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #45 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2009 | 24–20 | 54.5% | #40 | 1,701 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2010 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #21 | 1,822 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #129 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2011 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #16 | 1,830 | 0 | 3 | 2010 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #97 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2012 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #36 | 1,716 | 0 | 3 | 2011 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #39 | 1,669 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2013 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #26 | 1,799 | 0 | 5 | 2012 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #103 | 1,588 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2014 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #24 | 1,763 | 0 | 7 | 2013 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #125 | 1,595 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2015 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #28 | 1,867 | 0 | 8 | 2014 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #151 | 1,583 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2016 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #27 | 1,744 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2017 | 41–23 | 64.1% | #15 | 1,832 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2018 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #42 | 1,805 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2019 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #31 | 1,796 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2020 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #38 | 1,800 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2021 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #11 | 1,826 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2022 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #367 | 1,786 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2023 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #58 | 1,812 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2024 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #30 | 1,839 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2025 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #47 | 1,808 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2026 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #400 | 1,725 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |