H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova vs Na Li H2H: 1-3

Na Li holds a 3–1 lead over Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Na Li leads 3–0 on hard courts, while Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Na Li won the 2013 Canadian Open round of 32 6-1 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova
Russia Age 35 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1 – 3
4 main-draw meetings
Na Li
CHN Age 44 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Na Li #5 6-1 6-4 Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova #31 Match data Aug 8, 2013* R32 Canadian Open Premier 5 → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Na Li #8 7-5 4-6 6-2 Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova #25 Match data Sep 27, 2012* R32 Pan Pacific Open Premier 5 → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Na Li #7 6-4 3-6 6-2 Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova #18 Match data Aug 27, 2011* QF New Haven Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova #137 6-2 6-4 Na Li #45 Match data Jun 26, 2008* R64 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova #445 #11 3,590 1,944 422 328 56.3% 0 0 0 2 10 12
Na Li #9 #2 7,585 2,117 338 159 68.0% 2 1 0 1 5 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova Na Li
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 2006 0–1 0.0% #377 1,497 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 2007 0–1 0.0% #286 1,494 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 2008 10–8 55.6% #45 1,593 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2009 24–20 54.5% #40 1,702 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2010 39–21 65.0% #21 1,824 0 2 2000 1–3 25.0% #136 1,496 0 0
19 2011 37–21 63.8% #16 1,813 0 3 2001 0–1 0.0% #302 1,480 0 0
20 2012 21–23 47.7% #36 1,712 0 3 — — — — — — —
21 2013 33–22 60.0% #26 1,798 0 5 — — — — — — —
22 2014 26–20 56.5% #24 1,764 0 7 2004 6–1 85.7% #78 1,599 0 1
23 2015 34–21 61.8% #28 1,868 0 8 2005 23–14 62.2% #56 1,710 0 1
24 2016 26–25 51.0% #27 1,749 0 8 2006 36–22 62.1% #21 1,818 0 1
25 2017 41–23 64.1% #15 1,832 0 11 2007 22–12 64.7% #29 1,819 0 1
26 2018 21–21 50.0% #42 1,806 0 12 2008 28–14 66.7% #23 1,863 0 2
27 2019 22–21 51.2% #31 1,797 0 12 2009 35–17 67.3% #15 1,938 0 2
28 2020 9–8 52.9% #38 1,802 0 12 2010 36–20 64.3% #11 1,849 0 3
29 2021 27–19 58.7% #11 1,835 0 12 2011 33–17 66.0% #5 1,862 1 5
30 2022 2–3 40.0% #367 1,793 0 12 2012 43–17 71.7% #7 1,999 1 6
31 2023 14–12 53.8% #58 1,814 0 12 2013 46–14 76.7% #3 2,067 1 7
32 2024 25–20 55.6% #30 1,846 0 12 2014 29–7 80.6% #9 2,024 2 9
33 2025 11–12 47.8% #47 1,810 0 12 — — — — — — —
34 2026 0–6 0.0% #445 1,727 0 12 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova Na Li
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 2006 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 2007 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2008 4 4 8 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2009 17 12 29 58.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2010 31 14 45 68.9% 5 4 9 55.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2000 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2011 26 15 41 63.4% 10 4 14 71.4% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2001 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2012 11 14 25 44.0% 7 7 14 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2013 26 16 42 61.9% 7 4 11 63.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2014 16 13 29 55.2% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 0 5 100.0% 2004 6 1 7 85.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2015 29 14 43 67.4% 3 5 8 37.5% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2005 16 12 28 57.1% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — — — — —
24 2016 18 18 36 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2006 18 14 32 56.3% 12 4 16 75.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2017 31 17 48 64.6% 8 3 11 72.7% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2007 13 5 18 72.2% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 2018 12 14 26 46.2% 8 4 12 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2008 26 12 38 68.4% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
27 2019 21 16 37 56.8% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2009 22 9 31 71.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
28 2020 6 4 10 60.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — 2010 17 14 31 54.8% 10 4 14 71.4% 9 2 11 81.8% — — — —
29 2021 15 14 29 51.7% 10 3 13 76.9% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2011 16 12 28 57.1% 15 3 18 83.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
30 2022 2 1 3 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2012 30 10 40 75.0% 12 4 16 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2023 6 8 14 42.9% 8 4 12 66.7% — — — — — — — — 2013 35 8 43 81.4% 5 4 9 55.6% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
32 2024 21 13 34 61.8% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2014 22 3 25 88.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
33 2025 6 8 14 42.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2026 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 298 220 518 57.5% 90 74 164 54.9% 27 30 57 47.4% 7 4 11 63.6% — 222 104 326 68.1% 77 33 110 70.0% 37 18 55 67.3% 2 4 6 33.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 675/751 of Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova's and 372/485 of Na Li's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova Na Li
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
14 2006 1/1 2.0 4.0 52.9% 63.0% 41.7% 42.9% 50.0% 52.9% 33.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
15 2007 1/1 0.0 3.0 55.6% 30.0% 25.0% 25.0% — 27.8% 14.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
16 2008 14/18 1.9 3.1 57.9% 64.6% 45.1% 37.4% 48.4% 56.5% 45.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 2009 43/44 2.0 5.1 58.9% 64.8% 43.9% 52.3% 46.7% 56.0% 44.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2010 54/60 2.6 5.3 59.2% 64.8% 45.4% 54.3% 46.6% 56.8% 46.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2011 55/58 3.0 6.1 60.1% 67.0% 46.1% 50.9% 53.5% 58.3% 46.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2012 40/44 2.4 5.6 59.2% 64.5% 41.9% 50.5% 46.8% 55.0% 42.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2013 47/55 2.9 5.4 56.6% 68.7% 46.2% 52.4% 48.3% 59.1% 44.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2014 38/46 3.9 7.4 56.4% 69.2% 39.6% 55.3% 52.4% 56.4% 42.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2015 38/55 2.3 5.4 65.0% 65.0% 49.8% 53.2% 46.1% 59.4% 40.5% 2005 2/37 1.5 3.5 71.4% 54.3% 62.6% 49.2% 41.7% 56.3% 43.6%
24 2016 42/51 2.8 4.0 62.7% 65.6% 43.7% 49.9% 53.7% 57.3% 45.0% 2006 36/58 1.9 2.3 71.1% 61.5% 49.3% 51.6% 50.5% 57.6% 45.2%
25 2017 64/64 3.0 4.5 62.3% 65.3% 46.2% 57.3% 45.7% 58.2% 45.1% 2007 33/34 1.5 2.0 71.5% 62.4% 51.9% 52.6% 45.7% 59.2% 46.2%
26 2018 40/42 2.6 4.3 65.0% 66.1% 43.9% 53.5% 44.9% 58.5% 42.8% 2008 32/42 2.2 3.9 66.3% 63.4% 48.3% 58.5% 51.1% 58.2% 46.8%
27 2019 43/43 2.3 4.7 62.3% 64.5% 43.4% 52.8% 52.7% 56.5% 44.2% 2009 47/52 2.1 2.9 63.9% 65.4% 51.1% 45.7% 50.4% 59.9% 46.1%
28 2020 17/17 2.6 4.9 68.4% 63.0% 42.0% 43.8% 46.7% 56.8% 44.8% 2010 48/56 2.3 2.9 68.5% 65.7% 49.2% 50.4% 51.7% 60.4% 47.3%
29 2021 40/46 2.5 3.5 67.9% 64.9% 45.5% 51.1% 50.1% 58.6% 44.6% 2011 39/50 2.1 3.2 69.1% 64.4% 47.3% 54.6% 51.5% 59.1% 45.2%
30 2022 5/5 1.6 4.0 76.0% 63.4% 43.9% 59.5% 62.2% 57.8% 47.5% 2012 49/60 2.3 3.0 68.7% 65.1% 53.5% 57.5% 51.0% 61.2% 47.8%
31 2023 26/26 3.0 4.8 62.0% 65.2% 45.9% 57.5% 47.3% 57.1% 45.2% 2013 52/60 2.8 4.2 63.2% 67.9% 49.4% 58.5% 57.2% 61.0% 49.3%
32 2024 44/45 3.3 4.0 61.4% 66.7% 49.9% 53.6% 49.7% 60.5% 43.2% 2014 34/36 1.9 4.0 66.5% 66.3% 49.7% 55.6% 57.2% 60.8% 50.0%
33 2025 18/24 3.3 4.9 60.8% 65.5% 42.7% 48.1% 49.6% 56.0% 39.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2026 5/6 2.8 5.0 55.8% 63.4% 35.4% 43.7% 16.8% 51.0% 34.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 675/751 2.7 5.0 61.4% 65.7% 44.9% 52.4% 48.6% 57.5% 44.0% — 372/497 2.2 3.2 67.4% 64.9% 50.1% 53.8% 51.9% 59.9% 47.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova Na Li
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 2006 1497 106.7 -0.12 +2.94 0.708 42.6% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 2007 1495 95.3 -1.54 +1.90 0.198 21.9% — — — 0.0% -5.50 — — — -0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2008 1594 123.9 +0.60 +1.13 1.055 51.1% -34 -21 +41 55.0% +0.70 2–2 (50%) 2–3 (40%) 100.0 -0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2009 1703 137.4 +0.76 +0.27 1.001 50.1% +30 -139 -61 55.8% +0.34 4–7 (36%) 6–5 (55%) 96.6 +1.57 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2010 1824 147.5 +0.89 +3.14 1.073 51.5% +11 -209 -176 60.6% +0.69 12–5 (71%) 6–3 (67%) 108.5 -0.83 2000 1497 107.1 — — — — +34 — — 14.3% -2.14 0–1 — — -0.21
19 2011 1813 146.7 +2.42 +2.57 1.110 52.3% -13 -37 -201 62.8% +0.83 11–14 (44%) 8–7 (53%) 95.3 -0.73 2001 1481 95.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.12
20 2012 1713 124.6 -0.76 -0.32 0.950 49.0% -8 +17 -68 45.2% -0.40 7–4 (64%) 2–3 (40%) 101.2 +0.72 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2013 1799 143.5 +3.24 +0.98 1.086 51.6% +2 -43 — 58.4% +0.54 10–9 (53%) 9–7 (56%) 100.1 -0.38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2014 1764 137.7 +1.25 -0.29 0.980 49.9% +33 -44 -144 54.8% +0.26 13–7 (65%) 8–5 (62%) 104.1 +0.90 2004 1600 125.7 — — — — +18 — — 81.3% +1.81 1–1 2–1 (67%) — +0.22
23 2015 1869 139.6 +1.52 -0.40 0.997 49.9% +23 -165 -236 54.6% +0.17 14–3 (82%) 9–8 (53%) 108.8 -1.25 2005 1711 139.1 -0.18 +0.14 0.999 49.8% -25 -56 — 61.4% +1.04 8–5 (62%) 4–4 (50%) 103.5 -0.97
24 2016 1750 138.9 +1.58 +1.71 1.055 51.0% -10 -52 -71 49.5% +0.19 7–8 (47%) 7–7 (50%) 96.0 -0.64 2006 1819 148.7 +1.65 +1.60 1.068 51.4% -79 -12 -62 61.2% +1.05 9–4 (69%) 7–4 (64%) 111.4 -2.52
25 2017 1833 151.2 +2.14 +2.10 1.077 51.6% +42 -19 -187 58.9% +0.68 16–9 (64%) 7–10 (41%) 101.9 -0.09 2007 1820 150.2 +2.75 +2.06 1.133 52.7% +69 -38 -48 62.2% +0.96 7–7 (50%) 3–1 (75%) 102.0 +0.95
26 2018 1806 145.1 +1.80 +0.68 1.031 50.5% +1 +47 -166 49.5% +0.06 7–10 (41%) 8–5 (62%) 98.9 -1.51 2008 1864 153.7 +2.74 +2.93 1.119 52.6% +37 — -127 60.4% +0.83 12–5 (71%) 4–4 (50%) 103.2 -1.80
27 2019 1797 148.1 +0.11 +1.68 1.017 50.5% +27 -20 — 51.5% +0.15 7–10 (41%) 5–3 (63%) 96.0 -0.49 2009 1938 153.8 +4.35 +2.54 1.150 52.7% +49 -152 -127 64.9% +1.04 10–6 (63%) 8–6 (57%) 103.4 -2.23
28 2020 1803 141.4 +0.01 +2.18 1.037 50.4% +63 -58 — 50.0% +0.20 4–2 (67%) 4–5 (44%) 102.3 -0.92 2010 1850 150.5 +4.51 +3.61 1.195 53.7% -23 -4 +91 64.3% +1.23 9–9 (50%) 6–7 (46%) 96.6 +0.93
29 2021 1835 148.9 +1.86 +2.03 1.077 51.4% -27 +92 -189 58.1% +0.77 6–7 (46%) 4–9 (31%) 94.1 -0.77 2011 1862 151.3 +3.52 +2.62 1.106 52.2% -57 +131 +42 62.8% +0.61 8–7 (53%) 9–6 (60%) 102.8 -0.26
30 2022 1793 111.4 +0.38 +1.45 1.125 52.8% +16 — — 53.8% +0.69 0–3 (0%) — — +0.51 2012 2000 162.2 +5.42 +5.11 1.234 54.2% -1 -5 -158 68.1% +1.30 11–10 (52%) 6–4 (60%) 100.7 0.00
31 2023 1815 138.1 +0.92 +1.92 1.054 51.1% -40 +71 — 50.8% +0.34 6–3 (67%) 3–4 (43%) 101.6 -0.81 2013 2067 165.5 +5.56 +6.05 1.265 55.0% +56 -126 -177 72.1% +1.64 8–5 (62%) 7–6 (54%) 99.0 -2.68
32 2024 1846 155.5 +3.69 +0.67 1.095 51.8% +87 -44 -230 56.0% +0.51 6–8 (43%) 7–2 (78%) 100.6 -0.60 2014 2024 155.9 +4.17 +5.37 1.275 55.5% +114 -110 -151 75.0% +1.82 6–4 (60%) 5–5 (50%) 96.9 +0.97
33 2025 1811 137.5 -0.74 -2.12 0.901 47.9% +27 -60 -83 46.3% -0.35 5–3 (63%) 6–4 (60%) 104.0 -0.64 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2026 1727 114.6 -1.24 -1.82 0.702 43.0% +27 — — 7.7% -2.46 0–1 0–1 — -0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1944 149.9 +1.44 +1.21 1.037 50.8% +15 -30 -132 54.5% +0.35 137–115 (54%) 101–91 (53%) 100.2 -0.90 — 2117 160.4 +4.01 +3.66 1.175 53.4% +13 -21 -66 65.1% +1.13 89–64 (58%) 61–48 (56%) 106.5 -1.53

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.