H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova vs Shuai Zhang H2H: 1-0
Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova holds a 1–0 lead over Shuai Zhang in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova won the 2020 Rome second round 6-4 6-7(5) 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 35
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CHN
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 16, 2020* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova | 6-4 6-7(5) 6-1 | Shuai Zhang | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova | #400 | #11 | 3,590 | 1,936 | 415 | 324 | 56.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 4 | 12 |
| Shuai Zhang | #54 | #22 | 1,905 | 1,856 | 225 | 288 | 43.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova | Shuai Zhang | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #377 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #203 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #286 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #149 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #45 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #235 | 1,412 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 24–20 | 54.5% | #40 | 1,701 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #154 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #21 | 1,822 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #90 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #16 | 1,830 | 0 | 3 | 2011 | 8–22 | 26.7% | #126 | 1,443 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #36 | 1,716 | 0 | 3 | 2012 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #127 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #26 | 1,799 | 0 | 5 | 2013 | 9–4 | 69.2% | #52 | 1,599 | 0 | 1 |
| 2014 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #24 | 1,763 | 0 | 7 | 2014 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #61 | 1,602 | 0 | 1 |
| 2015 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #28 | 1,867 | 0 | 8 | 2015 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #139 | 1,519 | 0 | 1 |
| 2016 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #27 | 1,744 | 0 | 8 | 2016 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #23 | 1,722 | 0 | 1 |
| 2017 | 41–23 | 64.1% | #15 | 1,832 | 0 | 11 | 2017 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #36 | 1,762 | 0 | 2 |
| 2018 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #42 | 1,805 | 0 | 12 | 2018 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #40 | 1,726 | 0 | 2 |
| 2019 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #31 | 1,796 | 0 | 12 | 2019 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #40 | 1,680 | 0 | 2 |
| 2020 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #38 | 1,800 | 0 | 12 | 2020 | 12–10 | 54.5% | #35 | 1,731 | 0 | 2 |
| 2021 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #11 | 1,826 | 0 | 12 | 2021 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #60 | 1,632 | 0 | 2 |
| 2022 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #367 | 1,786 | 0 | 12 | 2022 | 34–26 | 56.7% | #25 | 1,732 | 0 | 3 |
| 2023 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #58 | 1,812 | 0 | 12 | 2023 | 4–18 | 18.2% | #245 | 1,525 | 0 | 3 |
| 2024 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #30 | 1,839 | 0 | 12 | 2024 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #205 | 1,576 | 0 | 3 |
| 2025 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #47 | 1,808 | 0 | 12 | 2025 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #81 | 1,731 | 0 | 3 |
| 2026 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #400 | 1,725 | 0 | 12 | 2026 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #54 | 1,714 | 0 | 3 |