H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Anastasia Potapova vs Anett Kontaveit H2H: 1-2
Anett Kontaveit holds a 2–1 lead over Anastasia Potapova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Anett Kontaveit leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Anastasia Potapova won the 2022 Prague quarterfinal 6-1 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUT
Age 25
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
EST
Age 30
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 30, 2022* | Prague | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Anastasia Potapova | 6-1 6-1 | Anett Kontaveit | Match data |
| Jul 22, 2022* | Hamburg | WTA 250 | SF | Clay | Anett Kontaveit | 6-3 7-5 | Anastasia Potapova | Match data |
| Oct 17, 2018* | Moscow | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Anett Kontaveit | 2-6 6-3 7-5 | Anastasia Potapova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anastasia Potapova | #27 | #21 | 1,865 | 1,965 | 163 | 132 | 55.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Anett Kontaveit | #81 | #2 | 4,721 | 2,109 | 205 | 138 | 59.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anastasia Potapova | Anett Kontaveit | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #241 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2018 | 9–4 | 69.2% | #93 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #249 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2019 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #92 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #159 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2020 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #101 | 1,685 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #91 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2021 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #69 | 1,687 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #112 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2022 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #43 | 1,750 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #34 | 1,706 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2023 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #27 | 1,784 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 33–23 | 58.9% | #20 | 1,832 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2024 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #35 | 1,802 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #26 | 1,865 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2025 | 23–16 | 59.0% | #50 | 1,841 | 0 | 3 | 2020 | 21–11 | 65.6% | #23 | 1,912 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2026 | 21–13 | 61.8% | #27 | 1,879 | 0 | 3 | 2021 | 49–17 | 74.2% | #7 | 2,049 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 29–16 | 64.4% | #17 | 1,882 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #81 | 1,776 | 0 | 6 |