H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC
Anastasia Potapova vs Kateryna Baindl H2H: 1-1
Anastasia Potapova and Kateryna Baindl are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Kateryna Baindl leads 1–0 on clay, while Anastasia Potapova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kateryna Baindl won the 2019 Istanbul third round 6-3 1-0 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUT
Age 25
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
UKR
Age 32
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2019* | Istanbul | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Kateryna Baindl | 6-3 1-0 (ret.) | Anastasia Potapova | Match data |
| Sep 29, 2018* | Tashkent | WTA 250 | SF | Hard | Anastasia Potapova | 6-2 6-3 | Kateryna Baindl | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anastasia Potapova | #27 | #21 | 1,865 | 1,965 | 163 | 132 | 55.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Kateryna Baindl | #467 | #62 | 922 | 1,730 | 75 | 107 | 41.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anastasia Potapova | Kateryna Baindl | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #241 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2018 | 9–4 | 69.2% | #93 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2019 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #92 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2020 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #101 | 1,685 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #200 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2021 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #69 | 1,687 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #140 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2022 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #43 | 1,750 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #162 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2023 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #27 | 1,784 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #102 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2024 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #35 | 1,802 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #86 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2025 | 23–16 | 59.0% | #50 | 1,841 | 0 | 3 | 2018 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #98 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2026 | 21–13 | 61.8% | #27 | 1,879 | 0 | 3 | 2019 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #91 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #106 | 1,607 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #144 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #99 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #132 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #445 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |