H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Anastasia Rodionova vs Abigail Spears H2H: 1-0

Anastasia Rodionova holds a 1–0 lead over Abigail Spears in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Anastasia Rodionova leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Anastasia Rodionova won the 2012 Birmingham round of 64 7-6(3) 1-6 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anastasia Rodionova
Australia Age 44 Right-Handed 167 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Abigail Spears
United States Age 45 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Anastasia Rodionova #133 7-6(3) 1-6 6-1 Abigail Spears #466 Match data Jun 13, 2012* R64 Birmingham International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Anastasia Rodionova #872 #62 1,095 1,650 86 150 36.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Abigail Spears #1,280 #66 522 1,600 21 41 33.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anastasia Rodionova Abigail Spears
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2000 0–1 0.0% #239 1,491 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2001 0–2 0.0% #195 1,467 0 0 2001 0–1 0.0% #254 1,483 0 0
20 2002 5–3 62.5% #118 1,520 0 0 2002 0–1 0.0% #323 1,471 0 0
21 2003 7–8 46.7% #165 1,545 0 0 2003 0–1 0.0% #212 1,461 0 0
22 2004 0–1 0.0% #212 1,529 0 0 2004 7–6 53.8% #97 1,535 0 0
23 2005 2–3 40.0% #140 1,516 0 0 2005 6–17 26.1% #159 1,477 0 0
24 2006 10–15 40.0% #94 1,530 0 0 2006 3–3 50.0% #146 1,501 0 0
25 2007 11–20 35.5% #78 1,526 0 0 2007 3–7 30.0% #147 1,475 0 0
26 2008 8–20 28.6% #98 1,504 0 0 2008 0–1 0.0% #246 1,467 0 0
27 2009 5–9 35.7% #95 1,523 0 0 2009 1–2 33.3% #222 1,464 0 0
28 2010 17–20 45.9% #64 1,607 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 2011 8–21 27.6% #108 1,547 0 0 2011 1–1 50.0% #329 1,482 0 0
30 2012 6–13 31.6% #139 1,526 0 0 2012 0–1 0.0% #646 1,468 0 0
31 2013 2–7 22.2% #162 1,492 0 0 — — — — — — —
32 2014 2–3 40.0% #185 1,505 0 0 — — — — — — —
33 2015 1–2 33.3% #235 1,502 0 0 — — — — — — —
34 2016 0–1 0.0% #797 1,470 0 0 — — — — — — —
35 2017 2–1 66.7% #390 1,482 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Anastasia Rodionova Abigail Spears
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2000 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2001 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2001 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
20 2002 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2003 3 4 7 42.9% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2003 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2004 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2005 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 6 14 20 30.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
24 2006 9 10 19 47.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2006 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2007 10 14 24 41.7% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2007 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 2008 6 13 19 31.6% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2009 2 6 8 25.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2009 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2010 7 11 18 38.9% 6 6 12 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2011 4 14 18 22.2% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2011 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
30 2012 3 6 9 33.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2012 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 2013 2 6 8 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2014 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2015 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2016 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2017 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 51 94 145 35.2% 25 39 64 39.1% 7 15 22 31.8% 3 2 5 60.0% — 20 32 52 38.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 154/219 of Anastasia Rodionova's and 26/59 of Abigail Spears's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Anastasia Rodionova Abigail Spears
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
21 2003 1/15 2.0 7.0 60.0% 64.1% 26.9% 66.7% 0.0% 49.2% 32.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 1/13 3.0 4.0 45.8% 56.8% 51.9% 61.5% 60.0% 54.2% 37.7%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 9/23 2.7 6.1 54.5% 63.7% 43.7% 61.1% 50.2% 54.7% 39.2%
24 2006 5/25 1.6 2.4 68.3% 50.8% 35.0% 38.1% 31.3% 46.0% 38.2% 2006 2/6 4.0 4.0 62.3% 55.1% 45.9% 67.9% 19.2% 51.3% 35.8%
25 2007 22/31 0.9 2.3 63.8% 54.6% 44.9% 38.2% 58.7% 51.1% 37.2% 2007 7/10 2.4 3.1 61.1% 58.3% 47.6% 59.8% 36.4% 54.0% 39.4%
26 2008 24/28 1.5 3.4 60.0% 57.0% 40.4% 47.2% 45.2% 50.9% 40.3% 2008 1/1 0.0 4.0 47.4% 63.0% 36.7% 33.3% 14.3% 49.1% 32.7%
27 2009 13/14 1.1 1.6 65.0% 55.0% 41.5% 36.4% 48.0% 50.3% 42.9% 2009 3/3 2.3 3.7 60.3% 60.4% 43.7% 38.6% 42.8% 53.7% 41.3%
28 2010 30/37 1.8 3.3 62.3% 60.2% 44.7% 48.7% 56.1% 54.8% 42.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2011 27/29 1.1 2.3 63.7% 54.5% 41.4% 45.3% 48.2% 49.8% 40.7% 2011 2/2 2.0 3.5 64.6% 64.9% 25.0% 45.8% 27.3% 50.8% 45.4%
30 2012 16/19 1.5 3.0 63.5% 59.4% 41.7% 50.9% 45.6% 53.1% 38.4% 2012 1/1 5.0 3.0 56.7% 67.8% 42.2% 80.0% 40.0% 56.7% 40.4%
31 2013 8/9 1.1 3.1 62.2% 60.7% 45.2% 52.3% 48.1% 54.5% 38.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2014 3/5 0.7 4.3 60.6% 48.4% 39.1% 49.1% 44.4% 44.7% 36.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2015 1/3 1.0 4.0 56.7% 68.4% 44.8% 33.3% 18.2% 58.2% 32.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2016 1/1 0.0 3.0 56.3% 59.3% 47.6% 50.0% 20.0% 54.2% 32.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2017 3/3 1.0 2.7 65.7% 58.1% 52.6% 40.0% 62.2% 56.2% 52.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Anastasia Rodionova Abigail Spears
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2000 1491 100.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2001 1468 97.2 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.60 0–1 — — -0.01 2001 1483 97.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.10
20 2002 1521 110.8 — — — — +31 — — 68.8% +1.25 1–1 2–0 — +0.66 2002 1471 100.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — -0.01
21 2003 1546 112.1 -0.41 -1.53 0.632 41.5% +13 -5 +64 44.4% -0.11 4–2 (67%) 2–3 (40%) 103.0 +0.44 2003 1462 101.1 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — -0.05
22 2004 1530 99.5 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — +0.03 2004 1535 111.7 -1.26 -0.98 0.822 46.8% +26 — — 54.8% +0.23 2–3 (40%) 4–1 (80%) 101.7 +1.06
23 2005 1516 101.2 — — — — +8 — — 45.5% -0.55 0–1 — — +0.62 2005 1477 117.6 +0.04 -2.56 0.865 47.3% +36 — — 28.8% -1.37 3–3 (50%) 3–5 (38%) 98.4 -1.47
24 2006 1531 105.6 -3.96 -2.68 0.708 42.0% +19 — +38 38.9% -1.06 5–3 (63%) 1–0 — +0.88 2006 1501 101.6 -1.60 -1.23 0.736 43.7% +21 — — 46.7% -0.67 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — +0.07
25 2007 1526 112.8 -3.50 -4.50 0.761 44.3% +38 -79 — 38.3% -1.28 3–1 (75%) 1–4 (20%) 101.3 -0.27 2007 1475 108.0 -0.76 -1.77 0.858 47.0% +28 — — 28.6% -1.14 1–0 1–1 — +0.34
26 2008 1505 113.6 -2.71 -1.63 0.821 45.9% +44 -61 — 29.1% -1.78 1–4 (20%) 4–1 (80%) 99.2 -0.65 2008 1467 98.8 +0.26 -0.18 0.643 41.1% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.08
27 2009 1524 107.2 -3.03 -0.73 0.863 46.5% -3 -24 — 41.9% -0.68 2–3 (40%) 2–1 (67%) 101.2 -0.01 2009 1464 99.1 -0.15 -1.61 0.891 47.6% — — — 50.0% -1.12 0–2 1–0 — +0.08
28 2010 1607 116.6 -0.85 -0.88 0.938 48.8% -41 -81 -33 43.9% -0.63 8–6 (57%) 2–3 (40%) 103.6 -0.61 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2011 1547 124.2 -3.69 -1.81 0.811 45.4% -34 +33 — 30.6% -1.40 3–5 (38%) 3–6 (33%) 97.8 -0.88 2011 1482 101.5 +0.21 +1.14 0.922 48.3% — — — 50.0% -0.50 — — — +0.05
30 2012 1527 116.9 -1.23 -2.69 0.818 46.1% -15 +15 +3 36.4% -0.68 2–4 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.61 2012 1469 98.3 -3.42 -2.09 0.934 49.0% — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 0–1 — +0.01
31 2013 1492 113.2 -0.47 -2.98 0.838 46.1% -9 — — 33.3% -1.17 0–2 1–3 (25%) — -0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2014 1506 99.3 -1.73 -2.26 0.650 40.2% -19 — — 33.3% -1.75 2–0 0–1 — -0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2015 1502 99.6 +0.38 -1.15 0.776 44.7% — — — 33.3% -1.83 — — — -0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2016 1470 102.2 -3.27 -2.73 0.715 42.5% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.22 2016 1454 98.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2017 1483 106.0 +1.78 +1.28 1.200 54.3% — +62 — 66.7% +1.33 — 1–0 — -0.02 2017 1420 92.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2018 1445 96.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1392 96.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1362 94.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1650 116.6 -2.29 -2.02 0.833 46.1% +6 -26 +5 38.4% -0.97 31–34 (48%) 20–24 (45%) 103.2 -0.19 — 1601 108.4 -0.49 -1.68 0.852 46.9% +30 — — 37.9% -0.87 8–13 (38%) 10–9 (53%) 95.9 +0.16

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.