H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Anastasia Rodionova vs Akiko Morigami H2H: 0-1

Akiko Morigami holds a 1–0 lead over Anastasia Rodionova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Akiko Morigami leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Akiko Morigami won the 2009 Japan Women's Open first round 6-4 4-6 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anastasia Rodionova
Australia Age 44 Right-Handed 167 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Akiko Morigami
JPN Age 46 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Akiko Morigami #527 6-4 4-6 6-2 Anastasia Rodionova #103 Match data Oct 15, 2009* R32 Japan Women's Open International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Anastasia Rodionova #872 #62 1,095 1,650 86 150 36.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Akiko Morigami #402 #41 775 1,716 79 109 42.0% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anastasia Rodionova Akiko Morigami
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2000 0–1 0.0% #239 1,491 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2001 0–2 0.0% #195 1,467 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2002 5–3 62.5% #118 1,520 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2003 7–8 46.7% #165 1,545 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 2004 0–1 0.0% #212 1,529 0 0 2002 3–5 37.5% #143 1,501 0 0
23 2005 2–3 40.0% #140 1,516 0 0 2003 11–14 44.0% #62 1,585 0 0
24 2006 10–15 40.0% #94 1,530 0 0 2004 16–23 41.0% #67 1,596 0 0
25 2007 11–20 35.5% #78 1,526 0 0 2005 18–20 47.4% #49 1,635 0 0
26 2008 8–20 28.6% #98 1,504 0 0 2006 11–17 39.3% #87 1,631 0 0
27 2009 5–9 35.7% #95 1,523 0 0 2007 16–18 47.1% #49 1,648 0 1
28 2010 17–20 45.9% #64 1,607 0 0 2008 2–9 18.2% #252 1,564 0 1
29 2011 8–21 27.6% #108 1,547 0 0 2009 2–3 40.0% #407 1,572 0 1
30 2012 6–13 31.6% #139 1,526 0 0 — — — — — — —
31 2013 2–7 22.2% #162 1,492 0 0 — — — — — — —
32 2014 2–3 40.0% #185 1,505 0 0 — — — — — — —
33 2015 1–2 33.3% #235 1,502 0 0 — — — — — — —
34 2016 0–1 0.0% #797 1,470 0 0 — — — — — — —
35 2017 2–1 66.7% #390 1,482 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Anastasia Rodionova Akiko Morigami
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2000 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2001 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2002 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2003 3 4 7 42.9% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2004 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2005 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 8 9 17 47.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
24 2006 9 10 19 47.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2004 9 15 24 37.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
25 2007 10 14 24 41.7% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2005 12 13 25 48.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 2008 6 13 19 31.6% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2006 6 11 17 35.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
27 2009 2 6 8 25.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2007 9 12 21 42.9% 5 4 9 55.6% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
28 2010 7 11 18 38.9% 6 6 12 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2008 2 7 9 22.2% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
29 2011 4 14 18 22.2% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2009 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
30 2012 3 6 9 33.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2013 2 6 8 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2014 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2015 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2016 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2017 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 51 94 145 35.2% 25 39 64 39.1% 7 15 22 31.8% 3 2 5 60.0% — 50 72 122 41.0% 17 22 39 43.6% 10 13 23 43.5% 2 2 4 50.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 154/219 of Anastasia Rodionova's and 74/180 of Akiko Morigami's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Anastasia Rodionova Akiko Morigami
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
21 2003 1/15 2.0 7.0 60.0% 64.1% 26.9% 66.7% 0.0% 49.2% 32.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 5/25 1.6 3.2 60.2% 62.7% 43.9% 58.8% 42.0% 54.3% 42.8%
24 2006 5/25 1.6 2.4 68.3% 50.8% 35.0% 38.1% 31.3% 46.0% 38.2% 2004 6/39 1.5 3.3 59.3% 56.8% 49.1% 53.4% 52.8% 54.2% 46.9%
25 2007 22/31 0.9 2.3 63.8% 54.6% 44.9% 38.2% 58.7% 51.1% 37.2% 2005 11/38 2.3 4.5 56.6% 62.4% 42.3% 56.7% 53.5% 53.3% 44.3%
26 2008 24/28 1.5 3.4 60.0% 57.0% 40.4% 47.2% 45.2% 50.9% 40.3% 2006 13/28 1.2 1.8 63.3% 53.5% 45.5% 47.4% 35.4% 51.8% 43.5%
27 2009 13/14 1.1 1.6 65.0% 55.0% 41.5% 36.4% 48.0% 50.3% 42.9% 2007 26/34 1.3 3.0 64.9% 58.4% 43.4% 51.7% 50.3% 53.2% 46.6%
28 2010 30/37 1.8 3.3 62.3% 60.2% 44.7% 48.7% 56.1% 54.8% 42.4% 2008 8/11 0.6 2.4 69.5% 52.9% 40.0% 46.4% 52.1% 49.4% 42.0%
29 2011 27/29 1.1 2.3 63.7% 54.5% 41.4% 45.3% 48.2% 49.8% 40.7% 2009 5/5 1.2 2.0 64.0% 49.9% 35.5% 40.4% 52.4% 45.6% 37.9%
30 2012 16/19 1.5 3.0 63.5% 59.4% 41.7% 50.9% 45.6% 53.1% 38.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2013 8/9 1.1 3.1 62.2% 60.7% 45.2% 52.3% 48.1% 54.5% 38.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2014 3/5 0.7 4.3 60.6% 48.4% 39.1% 49.1% 44.4% 44.7% 36.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2015 1/3 1.0 4.0 56.7% 68.4% 44.8% 33.3% 18.2% 58.2% 32.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2016 1/1 0.0 3.0 56.3% 59.3% 47.6% 50.0% 20.0% 54.2% 32.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2017 3/3 1.0 2.7 65.7% 58.1% 52.6% 40.0% 62.2% 56.2% 52.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 154/236 1.3 2.8 62.9% 56.9% 42.6% 45.3% 49.4% 51.7% 40.2% — 74/188 1.4 2.9 63.0% 57.2% 43.2% 51.0% 48.1% 52.2% 44.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Anastasia Rodionova Akiko Morigami
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2000 1491 100.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2001 1468 97.2 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.60 0–1 — — -0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2002 1521 110.8 — — — — +31 — — 68.8% +1.25 1–1 2–0 — +0.66 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2003 1546 112.1 -0.41 -1.53 0.632 41.5% +13 -5 +64 44.4% -0.11 4–2 (67%) 2–3 (40%) 103.0 +0.44 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2004 1530 99.5 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — +0.03 2002 1501 103.0 — — — — +35 — — 35.3% -0.88 1–0 0–2 — +0.03
23 2005 1516 101.2 — — — — +8 — — 45.5% -0.55 0–1 — — +0.62 2003 1585 121.6 -0.48 -0.28 0.937 48.7% -8 -100 +67 51.7% -0.02 0–8 (0%) 2–2 (50%) 92.7 +0.18
24 2006 1531 105.6 -3.96 -2.68 0.708 42.0% +19 — +38 38.9% -1.06 5–3 (63%) 1–0 — +0.88 2004 1596 122.6 -0.53 +1.15 1.023 50.6% -43 -61 +14 45.8% -0.13 3–8 (27%) 4–5 (44%) 97.1 -1.06
25 2007 1526 112.8 -3.50 -4.50 0.761 44.3% +38 -79 — 38.3% -1.28 3–1 (75%) 1–4 (20%) 101.3 -0.27 2005 1635 126.1 -0.99 -0.37 0.949 49.0% -19 -61 -66 51.2% +0.07 4–6 (40%) 2–2 (50%) 96.9 +0.77
26 2008 1505 113.6 -2.71 -1.63 0.821 45.9% +44 -61 — 29.1% -1.78 1–4 (20%) 4–1 (80%) 99.2 -0.65 2006 1631 126.4 -2.35 +0.38 0.902 47.3% -29 -15 -35 41.4% -0.71 2–4 (33%) 1–0 — -1.77
27 2009 1524 107.2 -3.03 -0.73 0.863 46.5% -3 -24 — 41.9% -0.68 2–3 (40%) 2–1 (67%) 101.2 -0.01 2007 1648 131.2 -1.85 +2.31 0.995 49.7% -28 -24 -1 48.0% -0.25 3–6 (33%) 2–5 (29%) 95.4 -1.63
28 2010 1607 116.6 -0.85 -0.88 0.938 48.8% -41 -81 -33 43.9% -0.63 8–6 (57%) 2–3 (40%) 103.6 -0.61 2008 1565 114.3 -2.67 -1.70 0.830 45.9% +7 — — 30.4% -1.26 0–3 (0%) — — -0.43
29 2011 1547 124.2 -3.69 -1.81 0.811 45.4% -34 +33 — 30.6% -1.40 3–5 (38%) 3–6 (33%) 97.8 -0.88 2009 1573 99.5 -3.38 -1.25 0.696 41.5% — — — 22.2% -2.22 1–0 0–1 — -0.42
30 2012 1527 116.9 -1.23 -2.69 0.818 46.1% -15 +15 +3 36.4% -0.68 2–4 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.61 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2013 1492 113.2 -0.47 -2.98 0.838 46.1% -9 — — 33.3% -1.17 0–2 1–3 (25%) — -0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2014 1506 99.3 -1.73 -2.26 0.650 40.2% -19 — — 33.3% -1.75 2–0 0–1 — -0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2015 1502 99.6 +0.38 -1.15 0.776 44.7% — — — 33.3% -1.83 — — — -0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2016 1470 102.2 -3.27 -2.73 0.715 42.5% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2017 1483 106.0 +1.78 +1.28 1.200 54.3% — +62 — 66.7% +1.33 — 1–0 — -0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2018 1445 96.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1650 116.6 -2.29 -2.02 0.833 46.1% +6 -26 +5 38.4% -0.97 31–34 (48%) 20–24 (45%) 103.2 -0.19 — 1717 128.3 -1.80 +0.63 0.928 48.2% -20 -48 -1 45.7% -0.32 14–35 (29%) 11–17 (39%) 88.1 -2.30

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.