H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Anastasia Rodionova vs Alicia Molik H2H: 0-1

Alicia Molik holds a 1–0 lead over Anastasia Rodionova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Alicia Molik leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Alicia Molik won the 2007 Wimbledon first round 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anastasia Rodionova
Australia Age 44 Right-Handed 167 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Alicia Molik
AUS Age 45 Right-Handed 182 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Alicia Molik #75 6-3 6-2 Anastasia Rodionova #69 Match data Jun 27, 2007* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Anastasia Rodionova #872 #62 1,095 1,650 86 150 36.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Alicia Molik #403 #8 2,630 2,060 156 164 48.8% 0 1 0 1 3 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anastasia Rodionova Alicia Molik
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2000 0–1 0.0% #239 1,491 0 0 1999 7–12 36.8% #96 1,537 0 0
19 2001 0–2 0.0% #195 1,467 0 0 2000 6–11 35.3% #115 1,544 0 0
20 2002 5–3 62.5% #118 1,520 0 0 2001 14–17 45.2% #47 1,613 0 0
21 2003 7–8 46.7% #165 1,545 0 0 2002 10–19 34.5% #94 1,568 0 0
22 2004 0–1 0.0% #212 1,529 0 0 2003 25–16 61.0% #36 1,705 0 1
23 2005 2–3 40.0% #140 1,516 0 0 2004 42–19 68.9% #13 1,977 0 4
24 2006 10–15 40.0% #94 1,530 0 0 2005 17–14 54.8% #28 1,796 0 5
25 2007 11–20 35.5% #78 1,526 0 0 2006 6–14 30.0% #165 1,640 0 5
26 2008 8–20 28.6% #98 1,504 0 0 2007 18–22 45.0% #56 1,636 0 5
27 2009 5–9 35.7% #95 1,523 0 0 2008 1–6 14.3% #308 1,567 0 5
28 2010 17–20 45.9% #64 1,607 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 2011 8–21 27.6% #108 1,547 0 0 2010 8–12 40.0% #129 1,557 0 5
30 2012 6–13 31.6% #139 1,526 0 0 2011 2–2 50.0% #349 1,582 0 5
31 2013 2–7 22.2% #162 1,492 0 0 — — — — — — —
32 2014 2–3 40.0% #185 1,505 0 0 — — — — — — —
33 2015 1–2 33.3% #235 1,502 0 0 — — — — — — —
34 2016 0–1 0.0% #797 1,470 0 0 — — — — — — —
35 2017 2–1 66.7% #390 1,482 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Anastasia Rodionova Alicia Molik
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2000 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 4 8 12 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
19 2001 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2000 3 5 8 37.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 2002 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% 2001 9 12 21 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
21 2003 3 4 7 42.9% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2002 7 12 19 36.8% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
22 2004 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 15 10 25 60.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
23 2005 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 32 10 42 76.2% 6 5 11 54.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2006 9 10 19 47.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2005 17 11 28 60.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2007 10 14 24 41.7% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2006 3 9 12 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
26 2008 6 13 19 31.6% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2007 15 15 30 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
27 2009 2 6 8 25.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2008 1 3 4 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2010 7 11 18 38.9% 6 6 12 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2011 4 14 18 22.2% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2010 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
30 2012 3 6 9 33.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2011 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2013 2 6 8 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2014 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2015 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2016 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2017 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 51 94 145 35.2% 25 39 64 39.1% 7 15 22 31.8% 3 2 5 60.0% — 115 106 221 52.0% 24 33 57 42.1% 17 22 39 43.6% 0 3 3 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 154/219 of Anastasia Rodionova's and 89/224 of Alicia Molik's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Anastasia Rodionova Alicia Molik
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
21 2003 1/15 2.0 7.0 60.0% 64.1% 26.9% 66.7% 0.0% 49.2% 32.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 7/41 6.3 3.9 53.4% 74.6% 47.7% 72.3% 36.5% 62.3% 37.6%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 7/61 5.3 1.9 58.4% 68.2% 56.2% 50.7% 54.6% 63.4% 45.6%
24 2006 5/25 1.6 2.4 68.3% 50.8% 35.0% 38.1% 31.3% 46.0% 38.2% 2005 8/31 7.3 2.8 60.1% 72.0% 49.5% 63.8% 34.9% 63.1% 37.2%
25 2007 22/31 0.9 2.3 63.8% 54.6% 44.9% 38.2% 58.7% 51.1% 37.2% 2006 9/20 5.2 2.7 60.9% 56.7% 43.2% 48.0% 27.4% 51.0% 35.2%
26 2008 24/28 1.5 3.4 60.0% 57.0% 40.4% 47.2% 45.2% 50.9% 40.3% 2007 30/40 6.1 2.7 63.5% 66.5% 44.5% 56.3% 41.8% 58.7% 36.5%
27 2009 13/14 1.1 1.6 65.0% 55.0% 41.5% 36.4% 48.0% 50.3% 42.9% 2008 6/7 5.3 3.2 56.4% 63.3% 43.4% 57.3% 69.5% 54.6% 35.1%
28 2010 30/37 1.8 3.3 62.3% 60.2% 44.7% 48.7% 56.1% 54.8% 42.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2011 27/29 1.1 2.3 63.7% 54.5% 41.4% 45.3% 48.2% 49.8% 40.7% 2010 18/20 4.0 3.7 60.6% 60.4% 45.8% 56.5% 51.9% 54.8% 39.6%
30 2012 16/19 1.5 3.0 63.5% 59.4% 41.7% 50.9% 45.6% 53.1% 38.4% 2011 4/4 2.3 2.5 58.7% 56.1% 45.4% 40.6% 43.1% 51.6% 35.1%
31 2013 8/9 1.1 3.1 62.2% 60.7% 45.2% 52.3% 48.1% 54.5% 38.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2014 3/5 0.7 4.3 60.6% 48.4% 39.1% 49.1% 44.4% 44.7% 36.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2015 1/3 1.0 4.0 56.7% 68.4% 44.8% 33.3% 18.2% 58.2% 32.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2016 1/1 0.0 3.0 56.3% 59.3% 47.6% 50.0% 20.0% 54.2% 32.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2017 3/3 1.0 2.7 65.7% 58.1% 52.6% 40.0% 62.2% 56.2% 52.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 154/236 1.3 2.8 62.9% 56.9% 42.6% 45.3% 49.4% 51.7% 40.2% — 89/320 5.4 2.9 60.5% 64.9% 46.2% 56.3% 44.3% 57.6% 37.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Anastasia Rodionova Alicia Molik
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2000 1491 100.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.10 1999 1538 124.1 — — — — +1 +32 +39 40.0% -0.67 3–4 (43%) — — -0.37
19 2001 1468 97.2 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.60 0–1 — — -0.01 2000 1545 115.2 — — — — +14 -19 +28 40.5% -0.76 3–5 (38%) 1–2 (33%) 97.1 -0.44
20 2002 1521 110.8 — — — — +31 — — 68.8% +1.25 1–1 2–0 — +0.66 2001 1614 121.4 — — — — -29 -100 +81 50.0% -0.26 5–7 (42%) 8–4 (67%) 106.1 +0.43
21 2003 1546 112.1 -0.41 -1.53 0.632 41.5% +13 -5 +64 44.4% -0.11 4–2 (67%) 2–3 (40%) 103.0 +0.44 2002 1569 124.5 — — — — -14 -45 — 40.9% -0.48 1–7 (13%) 3–3 (50%) 93.3 -1.20
22 2004 1530 99.5 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — +0.03 2003 1706 136.1 +3.00 -2.49 0.999 50.8% -34 -56 -42 59.1% +0.82 8–4 (67%) 4–4 (50%) 105.1 -0.67
23 2005 1516 101.2 — — — — +8 — — 45.5% -0.55 0–1 — — +0.62 2004 1978 154.9 +4.02 +1.09 1.244 53.8% -4 -279 -302 66.4% +1.05 9–9 (50%) 8–6 (57%) 104.1 -3.21
24 2006 1531 105.6 -3.96 -2.68 0.708 42.0% +19 — +38 38.9% -1.06 5–3 (63%) 1–0 — +0.88 2005 1796 147.3 +4.13 -2.25 1.007 50.9% +36 — — 55.9% +0.43 4–4 (50%) 7–4 (64%) 98.0 -0.03
25 2007 1526 112.8 -3.50 -4.50 0.761 44.3% +38 -79 — 38.3% -1.28 3–1 (75%) 1–4 (20%) 101.3 -0.27 2006 1641 108.0 -1.66 -3.77 0.719 43.4% +48 +8 -24 33.3% -1.29 2–3 (40%) 3–6 (33%) 94.8 -0.84
26 2008 1505 113.6 -2.71 -1.63 0.821 45.9% +44 -61 — 29.1% -1.78 1–4 (20%) 4–1 (80%) 99.2 -0.65 2007 1636 131.0 +2.14 -5.78 0.884 47.8% +52 -31 -15 45.5% -0.23 6–6 (50%) 4–5 (44%) 99.9 -1.11
27 2009 1524 107.2 -3.03 -0.73 0.863 46.5% -3 -24 — 41.9% -0.68 2–3 (40%) 2–1 (67%) 101.2 -0.01 2008 1568 101.1 -1.44 -2.86 0.773 45.3% +84 -29 — 14.3% -2.36 — 1–2 (33%) — -0.12
28 2010 1607 116.6 -0.85 -0.88 0.938 48.8% -41 -81 -33 43.9% -0.63 8–6 (57%) 2–3 (40%) 103.6 -0.61 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2011 1547 124.2 -3.69 -1.81 0.811 45.4% -34 +33 — 30.6% -1.40 3–5 (38%) 3–6 (33%) 97.8 -0.88 2010 1557 118.1 -1.04 -3.67 0.876 47.8% +57 — +39 41.7% -0.54 4–4 (50%) 1–4 (20%) 96.8 +0.44
30 2012 1527 116.9 -1.23 -2.69 0.818 46.1% -15 +15 +3 36.4% -0.68 2–4 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.61 2011 1582 106.7 -1.46 -2.46 0.726 43.7% +48 — — 44.4% -1.44 1–0 — — -0.33
31 2013 1492 113.2 -0.47 -2.98 0.838 46.1% -9 — — 33.3% -1.17 0–2 1–3 (25%) — -0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2014 1506 99.3 -1.73 -2.26 0.650 40.2% -19 — — 33.3% -1.75 2–0 0–1 — -0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2015 1502 99.6 +0.38 -1.15 0.776 44.7% — — — 33.3% -1.83 — — — -0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2016 1470 102.2 -3.27 -2.73 0.715 42.5% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2017 1483 106.0 +1.78 +1.28 1.200 54.3% — +62 — 66.7% +1.33 — 1–0 — -0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2018 1445 96.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1650 116.6 -2.29 -2.02 0.833 46.1% +6 -26 +5 38.4% -0.97 31–34 (48%) 20–24 (45%) 103.2 -0.19 — 2061 138.9 +1.10 -3.69 0.889 48.0% +13 -83 -42 49.9% -0.02 46–53 (46%) 40–40 (50%) 99.4 -2.34

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.