H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Anastasia Rodionova vs Cara Black H2H: 1-0
Anastasia Rodionova holds a 1–0 lead over Cara Black in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Anastasia Rodionova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anastasia Rodionova won the 2008 Montreal second round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 44
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ZIM
Age 47
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 30, 2008* | Montreal | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Anastasia Rodionova | 6-2 6-2 | Cara Black | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anastasia Rodionova | #872 | #62 | 1,095 | 1,649 | 86 | 150 | 36.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Cara Black | #679 | #31 | 869 | 1,770 | 114 | 149 | 43.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anastasia Rodionova | Cara Black | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #239 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2001 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #195 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #44 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2002 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #118 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #50 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2003 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #165 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #41 | 1,742 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #212 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 19–25 | 43.2% | #58 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2005 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #140 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #56 | 1,620 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2006 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #94 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #51 | 1,601 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2007 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #78 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 5–20 | 20.0% | #138 | 1,457 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2008 | 8–20 | 28.6% | #98 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #179 | 1,491 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2009 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #95 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #288 | 1,496 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2010 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #64 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2011 | 8–21 | 27.6% | #108 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #660 | 1,480 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2012 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #139 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2013 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #162 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2014 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #185 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #235 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #797 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2017 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #390 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |