H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Anastasia Rodionova vs Emmanuelle Gagliardi H2H: 0-1

Emmanuelle Gagliardi holds a 1–0 lead over Anastasia Rodionova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Emmanuelle Gagliardi leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Emmanuelle Gagliardi won the 2003 Tashkent round of 32 6-2 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anastasia Rodionova
Australia Age 44 Right-Handed 167 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Emmanuelle Gagliardi
SUI Age 50 Right-Handed 171 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Emmanuelle Gagliardi #59 6-2 6-4 Anastasia Rodionova #161 Match data Oct 9, 2003* R32 Tashkent Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Anastasia Rodionova #872 #62 1,095 1,650 86 150 36.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Emmanuelle Gagliardi #736 #42 781 1,695 118 183 39.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anastasia Rodionova Emmanuelle Gagliardi
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2000 0–1 0.0% #239 1,491 0 0 1995 0–3 0.0% #229 1,465 0 0
19 2001 0–2 0.0% #195 1,467 0 0 1996 2–1 66.7% #123 1,504 0 0
20 2002 5–3 62.5% #118 1,520 0 0 1997 7–9 43.8% #78 1,531 0 0
21 2003 7–8 46.7% #165 1,545 0 0 1998 5–12 29.4% #101 1,497 0 0
22 2004 0–1 0.0% #212 1,529 0 0 1999 11–14 44.0% #68 1,563 0 0
23 2005 2–3 40.0% #140 1,516 0 0 2000 13–20 39.4% #95 1,546 0 0
24 2006 10–15 40.0% #94 1,530 0 0 2001 10–17 37.0% #69 1,546 0 0
25 2007 11–20 35.5% #78 1,526 0 0 2002 19–23 45.2% #61 1,583 0 0
26 2008 8–20 28.6% #98 1,504 0 0 2003 25–23 52.1% #56 1,608 0 0
27 2009 5–9 35.7% #95 1,523 0 0 2004 8–18 30.8% #105 1,524 0 0
28 2010 17–20 45.9% #64 1,607 0 0 2005 10–15 40.0% #95 1,505 0 0
29 2011 8–21 27.6% #108 1,547 0 0 2006 7–17 29.2% #115 1,470 0 0
30 2012 6–13 31.6% #139 1,526 0 0 2007 1–10 9.1% #131 1,408 0 0
31 2013 2–7 22.2% #162 1,492 0 0 2008 0–1 0.0% #261 1,401 0 0
32 2014 2–3 40.0% #185 1,505 0 0 — — — — — — —
33 2015 1–2 33.3% #235 1,502 0 0 — — — — — — —
34 2016 0–1 0.0% #797 1,470 0 0 — — — — — — —
35 2017 2–1 66.7% #390 1,482 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Anastasia Rodionova Emmanuelle Gagliardi
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2000 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
19 2001 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1996 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
20 2002 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% 1997 0 3 3 0.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
21 2003 3 4 7 42.9% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1998 0 4 4 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 2004 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 0 2 2 0.0% 8 9 17 47.1% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
23 2005 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 4 7 11 36.4% 8 10 18 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2006 9 10 19 47.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2001 5 7 12 41.7% 3 9 12 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
25 2007 10 14 24 41.7% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2002 14 14 28 50.0% 4 7 11 36.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2008 6 13 19 31.6% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2003 15 14 29 51.7% 9 7 16 56.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
27 2009 2 6 8 25.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2004 4 11 15 26.7% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
28 2010 7 11 18 38.9% 6 6 12 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2005 2 6 8 25.0% 8 7 15 53.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 2011 4 14 18 22.2% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2006 3 7 10 30.0% 3 7 10 30.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 2012 3 6 9 33.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2007 0 6 6 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 2013 2 6 8 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2014 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2015 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2016 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2017 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 51 94 145 35.2% 25 39 64 39.1% 7 15 22 31.8% 3 2 5 60.0% — 47 83 130 36.2% 59 76 135 43.7% 12 18 30 40.0% 0 6 6 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 154/219 of Anastasia Rodionova's and 32/135 of Emmanuelle Gagliardi's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Anastasia Rodionova Emmanuelle Gagliardi
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
21 2003 1/15 2.0 7.0 60.0% 64.1% 26.9% 66.7% 0.0% 49.2% 32.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2006 5/25 1.6 2.4 68.3% 50.8% 35.0% 38.1% 31.3% 46.0% 38.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2007 22/31 0.9 2.3 63.8% 54.6% 44.9% 38.2% 58.7% 51.1% 37.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2008 24/28 1.5 3.4 60.0% 57.0% 40.4% 47.2% 45.2% 50.9% 40.3% 2003 5/48 2.2 1.0 58.2% 63.7% 37.7% 50.1% 43.2% 52.8% 41.8%
27 2009 13/14 1.1 1.6 65.0% 55.0% 41.5% 36.4% 48.0% 50.3% 42.9% 2004 5/26 0.6 1.6 62.8% 59.3% 46.5% 44.8% 43.3% 54.0% 36.6%
28 2010 30/37 1.8 3.3 62.3% 60.2% 44.7% 48.7% 56.1% 54.8% 42.4% 2005 5/25 2.6 4.0 59.1% 65.7% 44.8% 58.1% 45.5% 57.0% 42.8%
29 2011 27/29 1.1 2.3 63.7% 54.5% 41.4% 45.3% 48.2% 49.8% 40.7% 2006 9/24 1.3 4.2 67.0% 59.1% 40.0% 31.3% 67.4% 52.8% 42.6%
30 2012 16/19 1.5 3.0 63.5% 59.4% 41.7% 50.9% 45.6% 53.1% 38.4% 2007 7/11 0.4 3.1 65.3% 53.5% 47.4% 57.3% 34.3% 52.0% 37.1%
31 2013 8/9 1.1 3.1 62.2% 60.7% 45.2% 52.3% 48.1% 54.5% 38.1% 2008 1/1 0.0 4.0 69.0% 57.5% 44.4% 42.9% 25.0% 53.4% 38.1%
32 2014 3/5 0.7 4.3 60.6% 48.4% 39.1% 49.1% 44.4% 44.7% 36.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2015 1/3 1.0 4.0 56.7% 68.4% 44.8% 33.3% 18.2% 58.2% 32.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2016 1/1 0.0 3.0 56.3% 59.3% 47.6% 50.0% 20.0% 54.2% 32.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2017 3/3 1.0 2.7 65.7% 58.1% 52.6% 40.0% 62.2% 56.2% 52.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 154/236 1.3 2.8 62.9% 56.9% 42.6% 45.3% 49.4% 51.7% 40.2% — 32/301 1.3 3.0 63.4% 59.6% 43.2% 46.6% 47.9% 53.5% 40.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Anastasia Rodionova Emmanuelle Gagliardi
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2000 1491 100.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.10 1995 1465 97.2 — — — — — — — 25.0% -2.25 0–2 1–0 — +0.03
19 2001 1468 97.2 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.60 0–1 — — -0.01 1996 1504 108.4 — — — — — +73 — 62.5% +0.13 1–1 3–1 (75%) — -0.16
20 2002 1521 110.8 — — — — +31 — — 68.8% +1.25 1–1 2–0 — +0.66 1997 1532 110.3 — — — — -57 +95 +68 47.5% -0.10 3–5 (38%) 2–3 (40%) 98.0 +1.15
21 2003 1546 112.1 -0.41 -1.53 0.632 41.5% +13 -5 +64 44.4% -0.11 4–2 (67%) 2–3 (40%) 103.0 +0.44 1998 1498 101.3 — — — — -92 +128 — 35.7% -1.26 3–5 (38%) 3–1 (75%) 99.3 +1.10
22 2004 1530 99.5 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — +0.03 1999 1563 123.3 — — — — — +85 +21 43.4% -0.13 2–3 (40%) 1–2 (33%) 98.5 -0.71
23 2005 1516 101.2 — — — — +8 — — 45.5% -0.55 0–1 — — +0.62 2000 1546 120.4 — — — — -122 +106 0 42.1% -0.54 4–6 (40%) 2–6 (25%) 96.9 0.00
24 2006 1531 105.6 -3.96 -2.68 0.708 42.0% +19 — +38 38.9% -1.06 5–3 (63%) 1–0 — +0.88 2001 1547 114.9 — — — — -78 +8 +74 42.6% -0.53 5–9 (36%) 1–4 (20%) — +0.16
25 2007 1526 112.8 -3.50 -4.50 0.761 44.3% +38 -79 — 38.3% -1.28 3–1 (75%) 1–4 (20%) 101.3 -0.27 2002 1584 127.0 — — — — -19 -57 — 46.5% -0.13 7–8 (47%) 6–5 (55%) 101.4 -0.34
26 2008 1505 113.6 -2.71 -1.63 0.821 45.9% +44 -61 — 29.1% -1.78 1–4 (20%) 4–1 (80%) 99.2 -0.65 2003 1608 119.0 -1.11 -1.05 0.887 47.4% +3 -1 +6 49.1% -0.17 8–6 (57%) 7–3 (70%) 105.1 +1.34
27 2009 1524 107.2 -3.03 -0.73 0.863 46.5% -3 -24 — 41.9% -0.68 2–3 (40%) 2–1 (67%) 101.2 -0.01 2004 1525 104.1 -0.28 -2.38 0.796 45.6% -6 +29 +75 33.9% -1.36 3–6 (33%) 3–1 (75%) 98.5 +0.11
28 2010 1607 116.6 -0.85 -0.88 0.938 48.8% -41 -81 -33 43.9% -0.63 8–6 (57%) 2–3 (40%) 103.6 -0.61 2005 1506 106.9 +0.17 -1.19 0.996 50.0% -24 +72 — 38.2% -0.60 6–1 (86%) 1–3 (25%) 105.3 +0.98
29 2011 1547 124.2 -3.69 -1.81 0.811 45.4% -34 +33 — 30.6% -1.40 3–5 (38%) 3–6 (33%) 97.8 -0.88 2006 1470 101.7 -2.03 -1.17 0.901 47.9% -33 +50 +92 34.6% -0.96 2–6 (25%) 3–4 (43%) 95.9 +0.09
30 2012 1527 116.9 -1.23 -2.69 0.818 46.1% -15 +15 +3 36.4% -0.68 2–4 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.61 2007 1409 97.3 -2.52 -2.76 0.774 44.8% -23 +90 — 12.5% -2.50 1–1 — — +0.05
31 2013 1492 113.2 -0.47 -2.98 0.838 46.1% -9 — — 33.3% -1.17 0–2 1–3 (25%) — -0.02 2008 1401 100.1 -0.04 -2.40 0.818 45.5% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.05
32 2014 1506 99.3 -1.73 -2.26 0.650 40.2% -19 — — 33.3% -1.75 2–0 0–1 — -0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2015 1502 99.6 +0.38 -1.15 0.776 44.7% — — — 33.3% -1.83 — — — -0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2016 1470 102.2 -3.27 -2.73 0.715 42.5% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2017 1483 106.0 +1.78 +1.28 1.200 54.3% — +62 — 66.7% +1.33 — 1–0 — -0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2018 1445 96.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1650 116.6 -2.29 -2.02 0.833 46.1% +6 -26 +5 38.4% -0.97 31–34 (48%) 20–24 (45%) 103.2 -0.19 — 1696 117.4 -1.31 -1.73 0.865 47.0% -33 +56 +46 41.2% -0.60 45–59 (43%) 33–33 (50%) 100.5 +1.25

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.