H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Anastasia Rodionova vs Flavia Pennetta H2H: 1-3
Flavia Pennetta holds a 3–1 lead over Anastasia Rodionova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Flavia Pennetta leads 3–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Anastasia Rodionova won the 2011 Linz fourth round W/O.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 44
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 44
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 14, 2011* | Linz | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Anastasia Rodionova | (w/o) | Flavia Pennetta | Match data |
| Jan 19, 2011* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Flavia Pennetta | 6-2 6-1 | Anastasia Rodionova | Match data |
| Sep 12, 2008* | Bali | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Flavia Pennetta | 6-3 7-5 | Anastasia Rodionova | Match data |
| Mar 26, 2008* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Flavia Pennetta | 6-4 6-2 | Anastasia Rodionova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anastasia Rodionova | #872 | #62 | 1,095 | 1,649 | 86 | 150 | 36.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Flavia Pennetta | #15 | #6 | 3,621 | 1,982 | 418 | 272 | 60.6% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 11 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anastasia Rodionova | Flavia Pennetta | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #239 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2001 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #195 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2002 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #118 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #95 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2003 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #165 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #69 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #212 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #38 | 1,670 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2005 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #140 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #23 | 1,777 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2006 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #94 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #28 | 1,729 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2007 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #78 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #39 | 1,768 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 2008 | 8–20 | 28.6% | #98 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 50–23 | 68.5% | #13 | 1,900 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 2009 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #95 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 52–23 | 69.3% | #12 | 1,902 | 0 | 8 |
| 28 | 2010 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #64 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 45–23 | 66.2% | #24 | 1,847 | 0 | 9 |
| 29 | 2011 | 8–21 | 27.6% | #108 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #20 | 1,785 | 0 | 9 |
| 30 | 2012 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #139 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 19–13 | 59.4% | #45 | 1,735 | 0 | 9 |
| 31 | 2013 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #162 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #31 | 1,745 | 0 | 9 |
| 32 | 2014 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #185 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #12 | 1,780 | 0 | 10 |
| 33 | 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #235 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #8 | 1,823 | 1 | 11 |
| 34 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #797 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2017 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #390 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |