H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Anastasia Rodionova vs Julia Vakulenko H2H: 1-0

Anastasia Rodionova holds a 1–0 lead over Julia Vakulenko in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Anastasia Rodionova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anastasia Rodionova won the 2008 Bali round of 32 6-2 3-0 RET.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anastasia Rodionova
Australia Age 44 Right-Handed 167 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Julia Vakulenko
UKR Age 43 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Anastasia Rodionova #77 6-2 3-0 (ret.) Julia Vakulenko #118 Match data Sep 11, 2008* R32 Bali Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Anastasia Rodionova #872 #62 1,095 1,650 86 150 36.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Julia Vakulenko #979 #31 916 1,730 51 76 40.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anastasia Rodionova Julia Vakulenko
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2001 2–5 28.6% #132 1,492 0 0
18 2000 0–1 0.0% #239 1,491 0 0 2002 1–5 16.7% #132 1,468 0 0
19 2001 0–2 0.0% #195 1,467 0 0 2003 4–8 33.3% #94 1,502 0 0
20 2002 5–3 62.5% #118 1,520 0 0 2004 10–18 35.7% #130 1,476 0 0
21 2003 7–8 46.7% #165 1,545 0 0 2005 3–3 50.0% #185 1,522 0 0
22 2004 0–1 0.0% #212 1,529 0 0 2006 6–5 54.5% #120 1,587 0 0
23 2005 2–3 40.0% #140 1,516 0 0 2007 22–19 53.7% #32 1,724 0 0
24 2006 10–15 40.0% #94 1,530 0 0 2008 3–12 20.0% #354 1,568 0 0
25 2007 11–20 35.5% #78 1,526 0 0 2009 0–1 0.0% #156 1,554 0 0
26 2008 8–20 28.6% #98 1,504 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 2009 5–9 35.7% #95 1,523 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 2010 17–20 45.9% #64 1,607 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 2011 8–21 27.6% #108 1,547 0 0 — — — — — — —
30 2012 6–13 31.6% #139 1,526 0 0 — — — — — — —
31 2013 2–7 22.2% #162 1,492 0 0 — — — — — — —
32 2014 2–3 40.0% #185 1,505 0 0 — — — — — — —
33 2015 1–2 33.3% #235 1,502 0 0 — — — — — — —
34 2016 0–1 0.0% #797 1,470 0 0 — — — — — — —
35 2017 2–1 66.7% #390 1,482 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Anastasia Rodionova Julia Vakulenko
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1 1 2 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — —
18 2000 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — —
19 2001 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2003 1 5 6 16.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 2002 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% 2004 6 8 14 42.9% 4 7 11 36.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 2003 3 4 7 42.9% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2005 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
22 2004 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 — — — — 6 4 10 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
23 2005 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 13 12 25 52.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
24 2006 9 10 19 47.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2008 2 5 7 28.6% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 2007 10 14 24 41.7% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2009 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
26 2008 6 13 19 31.6% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2009 2 6 8 25.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2010 7 11 18 38.9% 6 6 12 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2011 4 14 18 22.2% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2012 3 6 9 33.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2013 2 6 8 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2014 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2015 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2016 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2017 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 51 94 145 35.2% 25 39 64 39.1% 7 15 22 31.8% 3 2 5 60.0% — 23 32 55 41.8% 25 35 60 41.7% 3 8 11 27.3% 0 1 1 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 154/219 of Anastasia Rodionova's and 72/114 of Julia Vakulenko's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Anastasia Rodionova Julia Vakulenko
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 6/12 2.5 4.2 54.3% 69.0% 45.8% 57.4% 47.1% 58.3% 39.6%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 5/28 3.6 4.6 61.4% 68.3% 34.5% 44.4% 54.5% 54.6% 42.8%
21 2003 1/15 2.0 7.0 60.0% 64.1% 26.9% 66.7% 0.0% 49.2% 32.1% 2005 4/6 3.8 3.8 65.7% 71.7% 40.8% 64.6% 45.8% 61.0% 40.4%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 9/11 1.6 2.8 63.2% 59.1% 49.8% 43.3% 54.3% 55.0% 49.7%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 35/41 3.7 4.0 60.3% 65.0% 43.7% 49.6% 45.9% 56.1% 45.6%
24 2006 5/25 1.6 2.4 68.3% 50.8% 35.0% 38.1% 31.3% 46.0% 38.2% 2008 12/15 2.3 4.8 52.6% 61.4% 37.3% 49.5% 37.6% 49.5% 38.1%
25 2007 22/31 0.9 2.3 63.8% 54.6% 44.9% 38.2% 58.7% 51.1% 37.2% 2009 1/1 1.0 3.0 63.6% 52.4% 41.7% 33.3% 20.0% 48.5% 36.7%
26 2008 24/28 1.5 3.4 60.0% 57.0% 40.4% 47.2% 45.2% 50.9% 40.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2009 13/14 1.1 1.6 65.0% 55.0% 41.5% 36.4% 48.0% 50.3% 42.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2010 30/37 1.8 3.3 62.3% 60.2% 44.7% 48.7% 56.1% 54.8% 42.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2011 27/29 1.1 2.3 63.7% 54.5% 41.4% 45.3% 48.2% 49.8% 40.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2012 16/19 1.5 3.0 63.5% 59.4% 41.7% 50.9% 45.6% 53.1% 38.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2013 8/9 1.1 3.1 62.2% 60.7% 45.2% 52.3% 48.1% 54.5% 38.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2014 3/5 0.7 4.3 60.6% 48.4% 39.1% 49.1% 44.4% 44.7% 36.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2015 1/3 1.0 4.0 56.7% 68.4% 44.8% 33.3% 18.2% 58.2% 32.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2016 1/1 0.0 3.0 56.3% 59.3% 47.6% 50.0% 20.0% 54.2% 32.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2017 3/3 1.0 2.7 65.7% 58.1% 52.6% 40.0% 62.2% 56.2% 52.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 154/236 1.3 2.8 62.9% 56.9% 42.6% 45.3% 49.4% 51.7% 40.2% — 72/127 3.1 4.0 59.3% 64.4% 42.7% 49.7% 45.9% 55.1% 43.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Anastasia Rodionova Julia Vakulenko
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1493 107.2 — — — — — +2 — 42.1% -0.32 1–4 (20%) 1–1 — -0.28
18 2000 1491 100.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.10 2002 1468 100.2 — — — — — +1 — 23.1% -2.38 0–1 1–0 — +0.08
19 2001 1468 97.2 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.60 0–1 — — -0.01 2003 1502 115.0 +1.60 -1.26 0.949 48.8% -16 +36 — 38.5% -0.96 0–2 0–1 — -0.50
20 2002 1521 110.8 — — — — +31 — — 68.8% +1.25 1–1 2–0 — +0.66 2004 1477 114.2 -0.14 -0.77 0.943 48.8% +33 +33 — 41.0% -0.59 2–5 (29%) 5–3 (63%) 100.8 +0.59
21 2003 1546 112.1 -0.41 -1.53 0.632 41.5% +13 -5 +64 44.4% -0.11 4–2 (67%) 2–3 (40%) 103.0 +0.44 2005 1523 111.0 +0.98 -0.91 1.036 50.9% — +12 — 53.8% +0.31 0–1 1–1 — -0.16
22 2004 1530 99.5 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — +0.03 2006 1587 121.3 +0.51 +2.47 1.104 52.5% — +44 — 70.0% +1.10 0–2 2–0 — +0.61
23 2005 1516 101.2 — — — — +8 — — 45.5% -0.55 0–1 — — +0.62 2007 1724 140.9 +0.53 +1.87 1.040 50.5% -68 +9 -168 54.3% +0.49 10–6 (63%) 3–5 (38%) 106.8 +0.51
24 2006 1531 105.6 -3.96 -2.68 0.708 42.0% +19 — +38 38.9% -1.06 5–3 (63%) 1–0 — +0.88 2008 1569 101.1 -3.68 -3.86 0.755 43.8% +18 +42 — 30.3% -1.33 3–4 (43%) — — -0.51
25 2007 1526 112.8 -3.50 -4.50 0.761 44.3% +38 -79 — 38.3% -1.28 3–1 (75%) 1–4 (20%) 101.3 -0.27 2009 1555 — +1.66 -1.69 0.713 41.5% — — — — — — — — -0.05
26 2008 1505 113.6 -2.71 -1.63 0.821 45.9% +44 -61 — 29.1% -1.78 1–4 (20%) 4–1 (80%) 99.2 -0.65 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2009 1524 107.2 -3.03 -0.73 0.863 46.5% -3 -24 — 41.9% -0.68 2–3 (40%) 2–1 (67%) 101.2 -0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2010 1607 116.6 -0.85 -0.88 0.938 48.8% -41 -81 -33 43.9% -0.63 8–6 (57%) 2–3 (40%) 103.6 -0.61 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2011 1547 124.2 -3.69 -1.81 0.811 45.4% -34 +33 — 30.6% -1.40 3–5 (38%) 3–6 (33%) 97.8 -0.88 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2012 1527 116.9 -1.23 -2.69 0.818 46.1% -15 +15 +3 36.4% -0.68 2–4 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.61 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2013 1492 113.2 -0.47 -2.98 0.838 46.1% -9 — — 33.3% -1.17 0–2 1–3 (25%) — -0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2014 1506 99.3 -1.73 -2.26 0.650 40.2% -19 — — 33.3% -1.75 2–0 0–1 — -0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2015 1502 99.6 +0.38 -1.15 0.776 44.7% — — — 33.3% -1.83 — — — -0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2016 1470 102.2 -3.27 -2.73 0.715 42.5% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2017 1483 106.0 +1.78 +1.28 1.200 54.3% — +62 — 66.7% +1.33 — 1–0 — -0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2018 1445 96.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1650 116.6 -2.29 -2.02 0.833 46.1% +6 -26 +5 38.4% -0.97 31–34 (48%) 20–24 (45%) 103.2 -0.19 — 1731 126.1 -0.09 +0.34 0.975 49.2% -22 +25 -168 45.8% -0.26 16–25 (39%) 13–11 (54%) 102.1 +0.23

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.