H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Anastasia Rodionova vs Lourdes Domínguez Lino H2H: 1-0

Anastasia Rodionova holds a 1–0 lead over Lourdes Domínguez Lino in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Anastasia Rodionova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anastasia Rodionova won the 2009 US Open first round 6-0 4-6 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anastasia Rodionova
Australia Age 44 Right-Handed 167 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Lourdes Domínguez Lino
Spain Age 45 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Anastasia Rodionova #139 6-0 4-6 6-1 Lourdes Domínguez Lino #101 Match data Sep 2, 2009* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Anastasia Rodionova #872 #62 1,095 1,650 86 150 36.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lourdes Domínguez Lino #1,129 #40 1,305 1,673 125 157 44.3% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anastasia Rodionova Lourdes Domínguez Lino
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2000 0–1 0.0% #239 1,491 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2001 0–2 0.0% #195 1,467 0 0 2000 0–1 0.0% #141 1,489 0 0
20 2002 5–3 62.5% #118 1,520 0 0 2001 0–1 0.0% #378 1,479 0 0
21 2003 7–8 46.7% #165 1,545 0 0 2002 4–3 57.1% #390 1,518 0 0
22 2004 0–1 0.0% #212 1,529 0 0 2003 0–1 0.0% #319 1,503 0 0
23 2005 2–3 40.0% #140 1,516 0 0 2004 1–1 50.0% #208 1,508 0 0
24 2006 10–15 40.0% #94 1,530 0 0 2005 6–4 60.0% #72 1,553 0 0
25 2007 11–20 35.5% #78 1,526 0 0 2006 21–19 52.5% #52 1,623 0 1
26 2008 8–20 28.6% #98 1,504 0 0 2007 16–21 43.2% #71 1,557 0 1
27 2009 5–9 35.7% #95 1,523 0 0 2008 6–11 35.3% #91 1,507 0 1
28 2010 17–20 45.9% #64 1,607 0 0 2009 6–13 31.6% #134 1,477 0 1
29 2011 8–21 27.6% #108 1,547 0 0 2010 2–4 33.3% #85 1,487 0 1
30 2012 6–13 31.6% #139 1,526 0 0 2011 16–16 50.0% #79 1,574 0 2
31 2013 2–7 22.2% #162 1,492 0 0 2012 16–16 50.0% #48 1,652 0 2
32 2014 2–3 40.0% #185 1,505 0 0 2013 17–22 43.6% #69 1,620 0 2
33 2015 1–2 33.3% #235 1,502 0 0 2014 7–11 38.9% #110 1,568 0 2
34 2016 0–1 0.0% #797 1,470 0 0 2015 4–5 44.4% #100 1,550 0 2
35 2017 2–1 66.7% #390 1,482 0 0 2016 3–8 27.3% #220 1,516 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Anastasia Rodionova Lourdes Domínguez Lino
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2000 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2001 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2000 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 2002 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% 2001 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2003 3 4 7 42.9% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2002 — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — —
22 2004 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2005 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
24 2006 9 10 19 47.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2005 — — — — 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — —
25 2007 10 14 24 41.7% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2006 7 10 17 41.2% 14 8 22 63.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 2008 6 13 19 31.6% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2007 3 9 12 25.0% 13 11 24 54.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 2009 2 6 8 25.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2008 0 4 4 0.0% 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — — — — —
28 2010 7 11 18 38.9% 6 6 12 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2009 1 3 4 25.0% 5 9 14 35.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 2011 4 14 18 22.2% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2010 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
30 2012 3 6 9 33.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2011 3 6 9 33.3% 11 8 19 57.9% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
31 2013 2 6 8 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2012 10 8 18 55.6% 5 7 12 41.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
32 2014 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2013 1 8 9 11.1% 16 11 27 59.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
33 2015 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2014 0 5 5 0.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
34 2016 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2015 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — —
35 2017 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — 2016 0 3 3 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — —
Career — 51 94 145 35.2% 25 39 64 39.1% 7 15 22 31.8% 3 2 5 60.0% — 27 59 86 31.4% 94 88 182 51.6% 4 9 13 30.8% 0 1 1 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 154/219 of Anastasia Rodionova's and 19/20 of Lourdes Domínguez Lino's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Anastasia Rodionova Lourdes Domínguez Lino
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
21 2003 1/15 2.0 7.0 60.0% 64.1% 26.9% 66.7% 0.0% 49.2% 32.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2006 5/25 1.6 2.4 68.3% 50.8% 35.0% 38.1% 31.3% 46.0% 38.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2007 22/31 0.9 2.3 63.8% 54.6% 44.9% 38.2% 58.7% 51.1% 37.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2008 24/28 1.5 3.4 60.0% 57.0% 40.4% 47.2% 45.2% 50.9% 40.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2009 13/14 1.1 1.6 65.0% 55.0% 41.5% 36.4% 48.0% 50.3% 42.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2010 30/37 1.8 3.3 62.3% 60.2% 44.7% 48.7% 56.1% 54.8% 42.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2011 27/29 1.1 2.3 63.7% 54.5% 41.4% 45.3% 48.2% 49.8% 40.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2012 16/19 1.5 3.0 63.5% 59.4% 41.7% 50.9% 45.6% 53.1% 38.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2013 8/9 1.1 3.1 62.2% 60.7% 45.2% 52.3% 48.1% 54.5% 38.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2014 3/5 0.7 4.3 60.6% 48.4% 39.1% 49.1% 44.4% 44.7% 36.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2015 1/3 1.0 4.0 56.7% 68.4% 44.8% 33.3% 18.2% 58.2% 32.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2016 1/1 0.0 3.0 56.3% 59.3% 47.6% 50.0% 20.0% 54.2% 32.8% 2015 8/9 0.6 1.8 71.4% 55.2% 52.3% 49.6% 51.7% 53.6% 45.7%
35 2017 3/3 1.0 2.7 65.7% 58.1% 52.6% 40.0% 62.2% 56.2% 52.5% 2016 11/11 0.7 3.0 61.2% 54.4% 41.7% 50.1% 47.0% 49.7% 38.3%
Career — 154/236 1.3 2.8 62.9% 56.9% 42.6% 45.3% 49.4% 51.7% 40.2% — 19/282 0.7 2.5 65.5% 54.7% 46.1% 49.9% 49.0% 51.3% 41.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Anastasia Rodionova Lourdes Domínguez Lino
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2000 1491 100.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2001 1468 97.2 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.60 0–1 — — -0.01 2000 1489 98.2 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 1–0 — -0.06
20 2002 1521 110.8 — — — — +31 — — 68.8% +1.25 1–1 2–0 — +0.66 2001 1480 100.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.06
21 2003 1546 112.1 -0.41 -1.53 0.632 41.5% +13 -5 +64 44.4% -0.11 4–2 (67%) 2–3 (40%) 103.0 +0.44 2002 1519 112.4 — — — — — +41 — 57.1% +0.14 — 2–1 (67%) — +0.22
22 2004 1530 99.5 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — +0.03 2003 1503 98.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.07
23 2005 1516 101.2 — — — — +8 — — 45.5% -0.55 0–1 — — +0.62 2004 1509 105.8 — — — — — — — 50.0% +1.34 1–1 0–1 — +0.01
24 2006 1531 105.6 -3.96 -2.68 0.708 42.0% +19 — +38 38.9% -1.06 5–3 (63%) 1–0 — +0.88 2005 1553 117.7 — — — — — +72 — 61.9% +0.38 0–1 3–1 (75%) — +0.23
25 2007 1526 112.8 -3.50 -4.50 0.761 44.3% +38 -79 — 38.3% -1.28 3–1 (75%) 1–4 (20%) 101.3 -0.27 2006 1623 121.0 — — — — -68 +93 — 51.2% -0.30 4–4 (50%) 5–3 (63%) 102.8 +0.22
26 2008 1505 113.6 -2.71 -1.63 0.821 45.9% +44 -61 — 29.1% -1.78 1–4 (20%) 4–1 (80%) 99.2 -0.65 2007 1558 113.3 — — — — -56 +110 — 43.2% -0.49 4–3 (57%) 2–2 (50%) 100.6 -0.29
27 2009 1524 107.2 -3.03 -0.73 0.863 46.5% -3 -24 — 41.9% -0.68 2–3 (40%) 2–1 (67%) 101.2 -0.01 2008 1508 107.1 — — — — -48 +107 — 37.8% -1.11 1–4 (20%) 1–0 — -0.03
28 2010 1607 116.6 -0.85 -0.88 0.938 48.8% -41 -81 -33 43.9% -0.63 8–6 (57%) 2–3 (40%) 103.6 -0.61 2009 1477 108.0 — — — — -35 +83 — 37.8% -0.82 2–5 (29%) 2–5 (29%) 95.2 +0.87
29 2011 1547 124.2 -3.69 -1.81 0.811 45.4% -34 +33 — 30.6% -1.40 3–5 (38%) 3–6 (33%) 97.8 -0.88 2010 1487 102.6 — — — — 0 — — 35.7% -1.36 1–1 0–1 — +0.13
30 2012 1527 116.9 -1.23 -2.69 0.818 46.1% -15 +15 +3 36.4% -0.68 2–4 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.61 2011 1575 121.5 — — — — -73 0 +20 50.0% +0.11 6–6 (50%) 1–7 (13%) 95.2 +0.42
31 2013 1492 113.2 -0.47 -2.98 0.838 46.1% -9 — — 33.3% -1.17 0–2 1–3 (25%) — -0.02 2012 1653 124.6 — — — — -17 -96 — 54.3% +0.04 2–6 (25%) 4–1 (80%) 100.6 0.00
32 2014 1506 99.3 -1.73 -2.26 0.650 40.2% -19 — — 33.3% -1.75 2–0 0–1 — -0.10 2013 1620 121.2 — — — — -86 +113 — 41.3% -0.81 10–8 (56%) 2–3 (40%) 103.9 -1.33
33 2015 1502 99.6 +0.38 -1.15 0.776 44.7% — — — 33.3% -1.83 — — — -0.01 2014 1569 107.5 — — — — -102 +137 — 40.0% -0.89 1–0 1–2 (33%) — +0.57
34 2016 1470 102.2 -3.27 -2.73 0.715 42.5% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.22 2015 1550 113.7 -1.03 +0.35 0.984 50.1% — +126 — 50.0% -0.05 1–3 (25%) 2–0 — +0.51
35 2017 1483 106.0 +1.78 +1.28 1.200 54.3% — +62 — 66.7% +1.33 — 1–0 — -0.02 2016 1517 97.5 -3.20 -2.29 0.761 44.1% -86 +117 — 25.0% -1.75 2–2 (50%) 0–2 — -0.18
36 2018 1445 96.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1650 116.6 -2.29 -2.02 0.833 46.1% +6 -26 +5 38.4% -0.97 31–34 (48%) 20–24 (45%) 103.2 -0.19 — 1674 120.0 -2.29 -1.18 0.851 46.6% -55 +78 +20 45.2% -0.48 35–45 (44%) 26–29 (47%) 98.8 +0.46

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.