H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Anastasia Rodionova vs Serena Williams H2H: 0-3

Serena Williams holds a 3–0 lead over Anastasia Rodionova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Serena Williams leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Serena Williams won the 2011 Stanford third round 6-0 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anastasia Rodionova
AUS Age 44 Right-Handed 167 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0 – 3
3 main draw meetings
Serena Williams
USA Age 44 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 28, 2011* Stanford WTA 500 R32 Hard Serena Williams #169 6-0 6-0 Anastasia Rodionova #105 Match data
Mar 8, 2008* Bangalore WTA 500 QF Hard Serena Williams #11 6-1 6-4 Anastasia Rodionova #86 Match data
Mar 21, 2007* Miami WTA 1000 R64 Hard Serena Williams #18 6-3 6-3 Anastasia Rodionova #82 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Anastasia Rodionova #872 #62 1,095 1,649 86 150 36.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Serena Williams #320 #1 13,615 2,405 825 170 82.9% 23 23 5 17 3 71

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anastasia Rodionova Serena Williams
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1997 3–2 60.0% #101 1,582 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1998 26–11 70.3% #20 1,895 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1999 37–7 84.1% #4 2,170 1 4
18 2000 0–1 0.0% #239 1,491 0 0 2000 37–8 82.2% #6 2,174 1 7
19 2001 0–2 0.0% #195 1,468 0 0 2001 40–7 85.1% #6 2,259 1 10
20 2002 5–3 62.5% #118 1,521 0 0 2002 57–5 91.9% #1 2,348 4 18
21 2003 7–8 46.7% #165 1,546 0 0 2003 36–3 92.3% #3 2,369 6 22
22 2004 0–1 0.0% #212 1,530 0 0 2004 39–11 78.0% #7 2,192 6 24
23 2005 2–3 40.0% #140 1,517 0 0 2005 21–9 70.0% #11 2,028 7 25
24 2006 10–15 40.0% #94 1,526 0 0 2006 12–4 75.0% #95 2,016 7 25
25 2007 11–20 35.5% #78 1,525 0 0 2007 34–10 77.3% #7 2,058 8 27
26 2008 8–20 28.6% #98 1,503 0 0 2008 41–8 83.7% #2 2,109 9 31
27 2009 5–9 35.7% #95 1,522 0 0 2009 50–13 79.4% #1 2,106 11 34
28 2010 17–20 45.9% #64 1,606 0 0 2010 25–4 86.2% #4 2,149 13 36
29 2011 8–21 27.6% #108 1,573 0 0 2011 22–4 84.6% #12 2,155 13 38
30 2012 6–13 31.6% #139 1,539 0 0 2012 48–6 88.9% #3 2,239 15 44
31 2013 2–7 22.2% #162 1,502 0 0 2013 77–5 93.9% #1 2,345 17 55
32 2014 2–3 40.0% #185 1,514 0 0 2014 52–10 83.9% #1 2,209 18 62
33 2015 1–2 33.3% #235 1,509 0 0 2015 50–6 89.3% #1 2,197 21 67
34 2016 0–1 0.0% #797 1,476 0 0 2016 36–5 87.8% #2 2,177 22 69
35 2017 2–1 66.7% #390 1,485 0 0 2017 8–1 88.9% #22 2,172 23 70
36 — — — — — — — 2018 18–7 72.0% #16 2,078 23 70
37 — — — — — — — 2019 25–8 75.8% #10 2,052 23 70
38 — — — — — — — 2020 16–5 76.2% #11 1,991 23 71
39 — — — — — — — 2021 12–6 66.7% #41 1,950 23 71
40 — — — — — — — 2022 3–4 42.9% #320 1,891 23 71
44 — — — — — — — 2026 0–1 0.0% #320 — 23 71