H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Anastasia Rodionova vs Silvija Talaja H2H: 1-0

Anastasia Rodionova holds a 1–0 lead over Silvija Talaja in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Anastasia Rodionova leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Anastasia Rodionova won the 2003 Birmingham round of 64 6-3 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anastasia Rodionova
Australia Age 44 Right-Handed 167 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Silvija Talaja
CRO Age 48 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Anastasia Rodionova #119 6-3 6-1 Silvija Talaja #84 Match data Jun 11, 2003* R64 Birmingham Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Anastasia Rodionova #872 #62 1,095 1,650 86 150 36.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Silvija Talaja #1,214 #18 1,376 1,811 131 152 46.3% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anastasia Rodionova Silvija Talaja
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1993 0–2 0.0% #288 1,481 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1994 1–1 50.0% #251 1,486 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1995 0–3 0.0% #280 1,456 0 0
18 2000 0–1 0.0% #239 1,491 0 0 1996 9–4 69.2% #106 1,587 0 0
19 2001 0–2 0.0% #195 1,467 0 0 1997 2–4 33.3% #199 1,554 0 0
20 2002 5–3 62.5% #118 1,520 0 0 1998 7–6 53.8% #85 1,602 0 0
21 2003 7–8 46.7% #165 1,545 0 0 1999 32–22 59.3% #29 1,699 0 0
22 2004 0–1 0.0% #212 1,529 0 0 2000 25–28 47.2% #29 1,643 0 2
23 2005 2–3 40.0% #140 1,516 0 0 2001 9–18 33.3% #109 1,541 0 2
24 2006 10–15 40.0% #94 1,530 0 0 2002 19–23 45.2% #74 1,561 0 2
25 2007 11–20 35.5% #78 1,526 0 0 2003 15–21 41.7% #93 1,547 0 2
26 2008 8–20 28.6% #98 1,504 0 0 2004 10–14 41.7% #114 1,545 0 2
27 2009 5–9 35.7% #95 1,523 0 0 2005 2–6 25.0% #190 1,507 0 2
28 2010 17–20 45.9% #64 1,607 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 2011 8–21 27.6% #108 1,547 0 0 — — — — — — —
30 2012 6–13 31.6% #139 1,526 0 0 — — — — — — —
31 2013 2–7 22.2% #162 1,492 0 0 — — — — — — —
32 2014 2–3 40.0% #185 1,505 0 0 — — — — — — —
33 2015 1–2 33.3% #235 1,502 0 0 — — — — — — —
34 2016 0–1 0.0% #797 1,470 0 0 — — — — — — —
35 2017 2–1 66.7% #390 1,482 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Anastasia Rodionova Silvija Talaja
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
18 2000 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 — — — — 9 3 12 75.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
19 2001 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1997 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 2002 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% 1998 3 1 4 75.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
21 2003 3 4 7 42.9% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1999 6 7 13 46.2% 18 9 27 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7% 2 3 5 40.0%
22 2004 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 11 15 26 42.3% 10 7 17 58.8% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 3 3 0.0%
23 2005 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 6 10 16 37.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2006 9 10 19 47.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2002 14 13 27 51.9% 5 9 14 35.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 2007 10 14 24 41.7% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2003 7 11 18 38.9% 8 7 15 53.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
26 2008 6 13 19 31.6% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2004 5 8 13 38.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
27 2009 2 6 8 25.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2005 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2010 7 11 18 38.9% 6 6 12 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2011 4 14 18 22.2% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2012 3 6 9 33.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2013 2 6 8 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2014 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2015 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2016 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2017 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 51 94 145 35.2% 25 39 64 39.1% 7 15 22 31.8% 3 2 5 60.0% — 54 72 126 42.9% 64 58 122 52.5% 11 14 25 44.0% 2 8 10 20.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 154/219 of Anastasia Rodionova's and 11/68 of Silvija Talaja's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Anastasia Rodionova Silvija Talaja
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
21 2003 1/15 2.0 7.0 60.0% 64.1% 26.9% 66.7% 0.0% 49.2% 32.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2006 5/25 1.6 2.4 68.3% 50.8% 35.0% 38.1% 31.3% 46.0% 38.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2007 22/31 0.9 2.3 63.8% 54.6% 44.9% 38.2% 58.7% 51.1% 37.2% 2003 4/36 1.3 1.5 50.8% 55.1% 43.2% 58.3% 52.8% 49.3% 42.8%
26 2008 24/28 1.5 3.4 60.0% 57.0% 40.4% 47.2% 45.2% 50.9% 40.3% 2004 5/24 2.4 3.4 58.2% 63.5% 42.0% 55.5% 33.8% 54.2% 40.3%
27 2009 13/14 1.1 1.6 65.0% 55.0% 41.5% 36.4% 48.0% 50.3% 42.9% 2005 2/8 1.5 4.5 61.3% 62.4% 30.0% 58.3% 40.0% 49.2% 26.6%
28 2010 30/37 1.8 3.3 62.3% 60.2% 44.7% 48.7% 56.1% 54.8% 42.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2011 27/29 1.1 2.3 63.7% 54.5% 41.4% 45.3% 48.2% 49.8% 40.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2012 16/19 1.5 3.0 63.5% 59.4% 41.7% 50.9% 45.6% 53.1% 38.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2013 8/9 1.1 3.1 62.2% 60.7% 45.2% 52.3% 48.1% 54.5% 38.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2014 3/5 0.7 4.3 60.6% 48.4% 39.1% 49.1% 44.4% 44.7% 36.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2015 1/3 1.0 4.0 56.7% 68.4% 44.8% 33.3% 18.2% 58.2% 32.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2016 1/1 0.0 3.0 56.3% 59.3% 47.6% 50.0% 20.0% 54.2% 32.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2017 3/3 1.0 2.7 65.7% 58.1% 52.6% 40.0% 62.2% 56.2% 52.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 154/236 1.3 2.8 62.9% 56.9% 42.6% 45.3% 49.4% 51.7% 40.2% — 11/283 1.8 2.9 56.1% 60.3% 40.3% 57.0% 41.8% 51.5% 38.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Anastasia Rodionova Silvija Talaja
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1482 107.8 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.60 0–1 1–0 — -0.02
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1486 96.1 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.40 1–0 — — +0.23
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1456 101.4 — — — — — +52 — 14.3% -2.57 0–1 — — -0.09
18 2000 1491 100.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.10 1996 1588 117.3 — — — — — +65 — 62.1% +0.86 3–0 (100%) 0–1 — +0.42
19 2001 1468 97.2 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.60 0–1 — — -0.01 1997 1554 99.9 — — — — — +85 — 38.5% -0.92 0–1 — — +0.70
20 2002 1521 110.8 — — — — +31 — — 68.8% +1.25 1–1 2–0 — +0.66 1998 1603 114.3 — — — — -33 +19 — 54.8% +0.32 2–3 (40%) 2–0 — +0.52
21 2003 1546 112.1 -0.41 -1.53 0.632 41.5% +13 -5 +64 44.4% -0.11 4–2 (67%) 2–3 (40%) 103.0 +0.44 1999 1700 132.3 — — — — -87 +71 -46 57.5% +0.55 13–15 (46%) 6–5 (55%) 102.0 +1.18
22 2004 1530 99.5 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — +0.03 2000 1643 137.9 — — — — -51 +129 +73 45.8% -0.08 13–5 (72%) 3–4 (43%) 107.9 -2.17
23 2005 1516 101.2 — — — — +8 — — 45.5% -0.55 0–1 — — +0.62 2001 1542 116.1 — — — — +25 +122 — 35.7% -0.87 4–2 (67%) 2–2 (50%) 104.2 +0.71
24 2006 1531 105.6 -3.96 -2.68 0.708 42.0% +19 — +38 38.9% -1.06 5–3 (63%) 1–0 — +0.88 2002 1562 119.3 — — — — +33 +31 — 47.4% -0.24 7–10 (41%) 5–3 (63%) 97.9 +1.04
25 2007 1526 112.8 -3.50 -4.50 0.761 44.3% +38 -79 — 38.3% -1.28 3–1 (75%) 1–4 (20%) 101.3 -0.27 2003 1548 116.1 -2.31 -0.57 0.845 46.5% +6 +93 +47 44.0% -0.31 5–7 (42%) 3–6 (33%) 97.2 +0.68
26 2008 1505 113.6 -2.71 -1.63 0.821 45.9% +44 -61 — 29.1% -1.78 1–4 (20%) 4–1 (80%) 99.2 -0.65 2004 1546 112.4 -0.46 -1.30 0.878 47.1% -22 +86 — 46.4% -0.21 4–6 (40%) 1–1 — +0.24
27 2009 1524 107.2 -3.03 -0.73 0.863 46.5% -3 -24 — 41.9% -0.68 2–3 (40%) 2–1 (67%) 101.2 -0.01 2005 1507 106.7 -1.52 -3.11 0.524 38.5% -10 — — 33.3% -0.61 0–2 0–2 — +0.31
28 2010 1607 116.6 -0.85 -0.88 0.938 48.8% -41 -81 -33 43.9% -0.63 8–6 (57%) 2–3 (40%) 103.6 -0.61 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2011 1547 124.2 -3.69 -1.81 0.811 45.4% -34 +33 — 30.6% -1.40 3–5 (38%) 3–6 (33%) 97.8 -0.88 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2012 1527 116.9 -1.23 -2.69 0.818 46.1% -15 +15 +3 36.4% -0.68 2–4 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.61 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2013 1492 113.2 -0.47 -2.98 0.838 46.1% -9 — — 33.3% -1.17 0–2 1–3 (25%) — -0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2014 1506 99.3 -1.73 -2.26 0.650 40.2% -19 — — 33.3% -1.75 2–0 0–1 — -0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2015 1502 99.6 +0.38 -1.15 0.776 44.7% — — — 33.3% -1.83 — — — -0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2016 1470 102.2 -3.27 -2.73 0.715 42.5% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2017 1483 106.0 +1.78 +1.28 1.200 54.3% — +62 — 66.7% +1.33 — 1–0 — -0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2018 1445 96.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1650 116.6 -2.29 -2.02 0.833 46.1% +6 -26 +5 38.4% -0.97 31–34 (48%) 20–24 (45%) 103.2 -0.19 — 1811 127.0 -1.33 -1.36 0.798 45.3% -16 +78 +13 47.5% -0.10 52–53 (50%) 23–24 (49%) 102.1 +1.34

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.