H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Anastasia Rodionova vs Sybille Bammer H2H: 2-3

Sybille Bammer holds a 3–2 lead over Anastasia Rodionova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts, while Sybille Bammer leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Anastasia Rodionova won the 2008 Bangalore fourth round 7-6(5) 6-2.

AUS Age 44 Right-Handed 167 cm / 5'6"
H2H
2 3
5 main draw meetings
AUT Age 46 Left-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 7, 2008* Bangalore WTA 500 R16 Hard Anastasia Rodionova #86 7-6(5) 6-2 Sybille Bammer #20 Match data
Mar 7, 2007* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R64 Hard Sybille Bammer #46 6-1 6-0 Anastasia Rodionova #87 Match data
Feb 9, 2007* Pattaya WTA 250 R16 Hard Sybille Bammer #61 6-2 7-5 Anastasia Rodionova #89 Match data
Jun 29, 2006* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Sybille Bammer #47 6-4 6-4 Anastasia Rodionova #106 Match data
Feb 16, 2006* Bangalore WTA 500 R32 Hard Anastasia Rodionova #116 6-4 5-7 6-0 Sybille Bammer #63 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Anastasia Rodionova #872 #62 1,095 1,649 86 150 36.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sybille Bammer #161 #19 2,014 1,844 130 139 48.3% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anastasia Rodionova Sybille Bammer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2000 0–1 0.0% #239 1,491 0 0
19 2001 0–2 0.0% #195 1,468 0 0
20 2002 5–3 62.5% #118 1,521 0 0 2000 0–1 0.0% #294 1,487 0 0
21 2003 7–8 46.7% #165 1,546 0 0
22 2004 0–1 0.0% #212 1,530 0 0
23 2005 2–3 40.0% #140 1,517 0 0 2003 0–2 0.0% #148 1,474 0 0
24 2006 10–15 40.0% #94 1,526 0 0 2004 0–4 0.0% #175 1,441 0 0
25 2007 11–20 35.5% #78 1,525 0 0 2005 5–7 41.7% #77 1,492 0 0
26 2008 8–20 28.6% #98 1,503 0 0 2006 19–26 42.2% #49 1,569 0 0
27 2009 5–9 35.7% #95 1,522 0 0 2007 43–24 64.2% #19 1,780 0 1
28 2010 17–20 45.9% #64 1,606 0 0 2008 24–24 50.0% #26 1,682 0 1
29 2011 8–21 27.6% #108 1,573 0 0 2009 21–23 47.7% #54 1,662 0 2
30 2012 6–13 31.6% #139 1,539 0 0 2010 15–19 44.1% #68 1,646 0 2
31 2013 2–7 22.2% #162 1,502 0 0 2011 3–9 25.0% #161 1,569 0 2
32 2014 2–3 40.0% #185 1,514 0 0
33 2015 1–2 33.3% #235 1,509 0 0
34 2016 0–1 0.0% #797 1,476 0 0
35 2017 2–1 66.7% #390 1,485 0 0