H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Anastasia Rodionova vs Tamarine Tanasugarn H2H: 1-2

Tamarine Tanasugarn holds a 2–1 lead over Anastasia Rodionova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Tamarine Tanasugarn leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Anastasia Rodionova leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Anastasia Rodionova won the 2010 Libéma Open first round 1-6 7-6(5) 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anastasia Rodionova
Australia Age 44 Right-Handed 167 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main-draw meetings
Tamarine Tanasugarn
THA Age 49 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Anastasia Rodionova #76 1-6 7-6(5) 6-3 Tamarine Tanasugarn #72 Match data Jun 16, 2010* R32 Libéma Open International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Grass
Tamarine Tanasugarn #105 6-2 6-1 Anastasia Rodionova #81 Match data Feb 7, 2008* R32 Pattaya Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Tamarine Tanasugarn #34 6-2 6-3 Anastasia Rodionova #167 Match data Nov 8, 2003* QF Pattaya Tier V → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Anastasia Rodionova #872 #62 1,095 1,650 86 150 36.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Tamarine Tanasugarn #947 #19 1,508 1,825 268 276 49.3% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anastasia Rodionova Tamarine Tanasugarn
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1993 0–1 0.0% #407 1,483 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1994 1–1 50.0% #227 1,493 0 0
18 2000 0–1 0.0% #239 1,491 0 0 1995 2–5 28.6% #213 1,479 0 0
19 2001 0–2 0.0% #195 1,467 0 0 1996 9–5 64.3% #75 1,610 0 0
20 2002 5–3 62.5% #118 1,520 0 0 1997 18–20 47.4% #47 1,647 0 0
21 2003 7–8 46.7% #165 1,545 0 0 1998 20–21 48.8% #37 1,701 0 0
22 2004 0–1 0.0% #212 1,529 0 0 1999 8–13 38.1% #71 1,633 0 0
23 2005 2–3 40.0% #140 1,516 0 0 2000 31–19 62.0% #28 1,792 0 0
24 2006 10–15 40.0% #94 1,530 0 0 2001 24–21 53.3% #29 1,698 0 0
25 2007 11–20 35.5% #78 1,526 0 0 2002 32–26 55.2% #28 1,676 0 0
26 2008 8–20 28.6% #98 1,504 0 0 2003 28–23 54.9% #34 1,694 0 1
27 2009 5–9 35.7% #95 1,523 0 0 2004 19–25 43.2% #66 1,609 0 1
28 2010 17–20 45.9% #64 1,607 0 0 2005 7–16 30.4% #122 1,496 0 1
29 2011 8–21 27.6% #108 1,547 0 0 2006 9–7 56.2% #72 1,584 0 1
30 2012 6–13 31.6% #139 1,526 0 0 2007 9–18 33.3% #117 1,568 0 1
31 2013 2–7 22.2% #162 1,492 0 0 2008 19–16 54.3% #37 1,684 0 2
32 2014 2–3 40.0% #185 1,505 0 0 2009 10–12 45.5% #101 1,645 0 3
33 2015 1–2 33.3% #235 1,502 0 0 2010 14–9 60.9% #62 1,732 0 4
34 2016 0–1 0.0% #797 1,470 0 0 2011 4–10 28.6% #94 1,648 0 4
35 2017 2–1 66.7% #390 1,482 0 0 2012 4–7 36.4% #152 1,595 0 4
38 — — — — — — — 2015 0–1 0.0% #855 1,577 0 4

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Anastasia Rodionova Tamarine Tanasugarn
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2000 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2001 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1996 8 4 12 66.7% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
20 2002 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% 1997 12 11 23 52.2% 2 5 7 28.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 2003 3 4 7 42.9% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1998 15 12 27 55.6% 1 5 6 16.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 2004 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 3 8 11 27.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
23 2005 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 19 12 31 61.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 2006 9 10 19 47.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2001 18 15 33 54.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — —
25 2007 10 14 24 41.7% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2002 24 16 40 60.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
26 2008 6 13 19 31.6% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2003 21 16 37 56.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 1 3 66.7%
27 2009 2 6 8 25.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2004 13 18 31 41.9% 0 4 4 0.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 2010 7 11 18 38.9% 6 6 12 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2005 3 10 13 23.1% 0 4 4 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
29 2011 4 14 18 22.2% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2006 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
30 2012 3 6 9 33.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2007 7 12 19 36.8% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 2013 2 6 8 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2008 8 12 20 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 11 2 13 84.6% — — — —
32 2014 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2009 3 7 10 30.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
33 2015 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2010 12 5 17 70.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
34 2016 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2011 3 9 12 25.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
35 2017 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — 2012 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 51 94 145 35.2% 25 39 64 39.1% 7 15 22 31.8% 3 2 5 60.0% — 183 185 368 49.7% 12 47 59 20.3% 67 37 104 64.4% 6 7 13 46.2%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 154/219 of Anastasia Rodionova's and 141/267 of Tamarine Tanasugarn's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Anastasia Rodionova Tamarine Tanasugarn
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
21 2003 1/15 2.0 7.0 60.0% 64.1% 26.9% 66.7% 0.0% 49.2% 32.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2006 5/25 1.6 2.4 68.3% 50.8% 35.0% 38.1% 31.3% 46.0% 38.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2007 22/31 0.9 2.3 63.8% 54.6% 44.9% 38.2% 58.7% 51.1% 37.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2008 24/28 1.5 3.4 60.0% 57.0% 40.4% 47.2% 45.2% 50.9% 40.3% 2003 6/51 2.0 3.0 58.2% 61.2% 49.7% 35.8% 37.7% 56.3% 42.0%
27 2009 13/14 1.1 1.6 65.0% 55.0% 41.5% 36.4% 48.0% 50.3% 42.9% 2004 4/44 2.0 4.5 59.8% 53.6% 36.4% 48.4% 51.3% 46.9% 39.9%
28 2010 30/37 1.8 3.3 62.3% 60.2% 44.7% 48.7% 56.1% 54.8% 42.4% 2005 9/23 1.8 3.6 58.3% 59.8% 45.3% 40.8% 52.1% 53.8% 48.0%
29 2011 27/29 1.1 2.3 63.7% 54.5% 41.4% 45.3% 48.2% 49.8% 40.7% 2006 3/16 1.7 2.3 62.1% 59.8% 46.6% 49.0% 41.0% 55.0% 41.7%
30 2012 16/19 1.5 3.0 63.5% 59.4% 41.7% 50.9% 45.6% 53.1% 38.4% 2007 21/27 1.4 4.0 59.8% 57.8% 40.3% 47.2% 47.0% 50.7% 40.6%
31 2013 8/9 1.1 3.1 62.2% 60.7% 45.2% 52.3% 48.1% 54.5% 38.1% 2008 30/35 1.1 2.9 62.5% 63.1% 46.1% 61.7% 50.8% 56.7% 42.7%
32 2014 3/5 0.7 4.3 60.6% 48.4% 39.1% 49.1% 44.4% 44.7% 36.0% 2009 20/22 0.8 3.4 65.8% 60.5% 46.3% 57.5% 47.3% 55.3% 42.6%
33 2015 1/3 1.0 4.0 56.7% 68.4% 44.8% 33.3% 18.2% 58.2% 32.4% 2010 22/23 1.0 3.1 68.1% 58.7% 51.5% 55.0% 56.2% 56.1% 48.3%
34 2016 1/1 0.0 3.0 56.3% 59.3% 47.6% 50.0% 20.0% 54.2% 32.8% 2011 14/14 0.7 3.4 63.9% 56.7% 43.6% 34.9% 42.6% 51.9% 40.0%
35 2017 3/3 1.0 2.7 65.7% 58.1% 52.6% 40.0% 62.2% 56.2% 52.5% 2012 11/11 1.0 3.5 64.1% 52.1% 45.1% 43.9% 58.9% 49.2% 41.3%
38 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 1/1 0.0 4.0 67.2% 51.3% 36.8% 50.0% 50.0% 46.6% 30.9%
Career — 154/236 1.3 2.8 62.9% 56.9% 42.6% 45.3% 49.4% 51.7% 40.2% — 141/544 1.1 3.3 63.2% 59.0% 45.5% 50.7% 49.7% 53.9% 43.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Anastasia Rodionova Tamarine Tanasugarn
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1483 96.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — +0.17
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1493 103.5 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.83 1–1 — — +0.06
18 2000 1491 100.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.10 1995 1479 101.3 — — — — +23 — — 29.4% -1.53 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 100.8 +0.28
19 2001 1468 97.2 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.60 0–1 — — -0.01 1996 1610 124.2 — — — — +2 — — 64.3% +1.21 0–2 1–3 (25%) — +0.66
20 2002 1521 110.8 — — — — +31 — — 68.8% +1.25 1–1 2–0 — +0.66 1997 1648 125.4 — — — — -4 -102 +9 48.3% -0.34 5–6 (45%) 3–2 (60%) 100.9 +1.65
21 2003 1546 112.1 -0.41 -1.53 0.632 41.5% +13 -5 +64 44.4% -0.11 4–2 (67%) 2–3 (40%) 103.0 +0.44 1998 1702 138.7 — — — — +13 -199 +25 48.9% -0.10 5–5 (50%) 3–4 (43%) 99.1 +1.91
22 2004 1530 99.5 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — +0.03 1999 1634 113.0 — — — — -11 -165 +110 40.8% -0.57 3–4 (43%) 3–2 (60%) 99.4 +0.52
23 2005 1516 101.2 — — — — +8 — — 45.5% -0.55 0–1 — — +0.62 2000 1792 139.5 — — — — -52 -296 +110 59.5% +0.54 7–4 (64%) 6–7 (46%) 102.9 -1.30
24 2006 1531 105.6 -3.96 -2.68 0.708 42.0% +19 — +38 38.9% -1.06 5–3 (63%) 1–0 — +0.88 2001 1698 135.6 — — — — +14 -272 +291 51.5% +0.09 8–9 (47%) 7–6 (54%) 97.5 +2.28
25 2007 1526 112.8 -3.50 -4.50 0.761 44.3% +38 -79 — 38.3% -1.28 3–1 (75%) 1–4 (20%) 101.3 -0.27 2002 1677 130.8 — — — — +37 -232 +254 52.5% +0.01 15–10 (60%) 7–6 (54%) 101.9 +2.48
26 2008 1505 113.6 -2.71 -1.63 0.821 45.9% +44 -61 — 29.1% -1.78 1–4 (20%) 4–1 (80%) 99.2 -0.65 2003 1695 137.1 +0.58 -0.37 0.961 48.9% +45 -272 +201 54.7% +0.32 7–8 (47%) 5–6 (45%) 97.4 +0.78
27 2009 1524 107.2 -3.03 -0.73 0.863 46.5% -3 -24 — 41.9% -0.68 2–3 (40%) 2–1 (67%) 101.2 -0.01 2004 1610 121.0 -2.76 -1.27 0.751 43.8% -13 -221 +320 45.7% -0.05 2–8 (20%) 3–4 (43%) 92.4 +1.55
28 2010 1607 116.6 -0.85 -0.88 0.938 48.8% -41 -81 -33 43.9% -0.63 8–6 (57%) 2–3 (40%) 103.6 -0.61 2005 1497 98.5 -0.83 +0.77 1.037 50.9% -9 -166 +399 30.6% -1.35 2–1 (67%) 0–2 — +0.91
29 2011 1547 124.2 -3.69 -1.81 0.811 45.4% -34 +33 — 30.6% -1.40 3–5 (38%) 3–6 (33%) 97.8 -0.88 2006 1585 113.8 -0.78 -1.37 0.927 47.9% -34 — +318 52.8% +0.56 3–3 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 98.4 +0.99
30 2012 1527 116.9 -1.23 -2.69 0.818 46.1% -15 +15 +3 36.4% -0.68 2–4 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.61 2007 1569 117.4 -2.84 -1.65 0.822 45.7% 0 -212 — 29.8% -1.54 4–3 (57%) 2–1 (67%) 103.0 -2.05
31 2013 1492 113.2 -0.47 -2.98 0.838 46.1% -9 — — 33.3% -1.17 0–2 1–3 (25%) — -0.02 2008 1684 130.6 +1.07 -0.63 0.987 49.9% -102 — +348 53.2% -0.05 5–4 (56%) 5–1 (83%) 104.5 -1.05
32 2014 1506 99.3 -1.73 -2.26 0.650 40.2% -19 — — 33.3% -1.75 2–0 0–1 — -0.10 2009 1646 112.2 -0.30 -0.53 0.953 49.0% -110 -287 +344 46.9% -0.18 2–3 (40%) 2–1 (67%) 99.3 -0.13
33 2015 1502 99.6 +0.38 -1.15 0.776 44.7% — — — 33.3% -1.83 — — — -0.01 2010 1732 129.8 +0.24 +3.07 1.101 52.2% -26 — +172 55.8% +0.65 5–1 (83%) 2–2 (50%) 104.9 -0.51
34 2016 1470 102.2 -3.27 -2.73 0.715 42.5% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.22 2011 1648 112.1 -1.46 -2.12 0.832 45.7% -16 — — 28.6% -1.57 — — — -0.69
35 2017 1483 106.0 +1.78 +1.28 1.200 54.3% — +62 — 66.7% +1.33 — 1–0 — -0.02 2012 1595 100.2 -3.00 -1.41 0.812 45.8% +29 — — 31.8% -1.59 1–1 1–1 — -0.01
36 2018 1445 96.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1577 97.4 -0.66 -2.32 0.578 38.9% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — 0–1 — +0.05
Career — 1650 116.6 -2.29 -2.02 0.833 46.1% +6 -26 +5 38.4% -0.97 31–34 (48%) 20–24 (45%) 103.2 -0.19 — 1825 132.1 -0.71 -0.34 0.932 48.5% -6 -214 +226 48.6% -0.13 77–74 (51%) 52–55 (49%) 98.6 +1.57

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.