H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC

Anastasia Rodionova vs Venus Williams H2H: 0-2

Venus Williams holds a 2–0 lead over Anastasia Rodionova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Venus Williams leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Venus Williams won the 2012 Charleston fourth round 7-5 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anastasia Rodionova
AUS Age 44 Right-Handed 167 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main draw meetings
Venus Williams
USA Age 46 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 6, 2012* Charleston WTA 500 R16 Clay Venus Williams #87 7-5 6-2 Anastasia Rodionova #98 Match data
Aug 1, 2007* San Diego WTA 1000 R64 Hard Venus Williams #16 6-3 6-0 Anastasia Rodionova #81 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Anastasia Rodionova #872 #62 1,095 1,649 86 150 36.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Venus Williams #467 #1 7,452 2,362 768 288 72.7% 7 9 1 20 10 47

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anastasia Rodionova Venus Williams
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1994 1–1 50.0% — 1,525 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1995 2–3 40.0% #205 1,561 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1996 2–5 28.6% #216 1,571 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1997 20–13 60.6% #22 1,851 0 0
18 2000 0–1 0.0% #239 1,491 0 0 1998 50–13 79.4% #5 2,094 0 2
19 2001 0–2 0.0% #195 1,468 0 0 1999 57–11 83.8% #3 2,258 0 8
20 2002 5–3 62.5% #118 1,521 0 0 2000 35–4 89.7% #3 2,321 2 13
21 2003 7–8 46.7% #165 1,546 0 0 2001 46–6 88.5% #3 2,338 4 19
22 2004 0–1 0.0% #212 1,530 0 0 2002 63–9 87.5% #2 2,297 4 26
23 2005 2–3 40.0% #140 1,517 0 0 2003 24–5 82.8% #11 2,257 4 27
24 2006 10–15 40.0% #94 1,526 0 0 2004 40–13 75.5% #9 2,072 4 29
25 2007 11–20 35.5% #78 1,525 0 0 2005 34–10 77.3% #10 2,085 5 31
26 2008 8–20 28.6% #98 1,503 0 0 2006 13–6 68.4% #46 2,007 5 31
27 2009 5–9 35.7% #95 1,522 0 0 2007 46–10 82.1% #8 2,048 6 34
28 2010 17–20 45.9% #64 1,606 0 0 2008 37–10 78.7% #6 2,133 7 37
29 2011 8–21 27.6% #108 1,573 0 0 2009 38–16 70.4% #6 1,981 7 39
30 2012 6–13 31.6% #139 1,539 0 0 2010 38–7 84.4% #5 2,057 7 41
31 2013 2–7 22.2% #162 1,502 0 0 2011 8–4 66.7% #102 1,994 7 41
32 2014 2–3 40.0% #185 1,514 0 0 2012 22–8 73.3% #24 2,007 7 42
33 2015 1–2 33.3% #235 1,509 0 0 2013 15–11 57.7% #47 1,889 7 42
34 2016 0–1 0.0% #797 1,476 0 0 2014 33–15 68.8% #18 1,874 7 43
35 2017 2–1 66.7% #390 1,485 0 0 2015 39–14 73.6% #7 1,957 7 46
36 — — — — — — — 2016 24–14 63.2% #17 1,830 7 47
37 — — — — — — — 2017 38–15 71.7% #5 1,935 7 47
38 — — — — — — — 2018 15–11 57.7% #39 1,867 7 47
39 — — — — — — — 2019 20–15 57.1% #52 1,827 7 47
40 — — — — — — — 2020 1–8 11.1% #79 1,717 7 47
41 — — — — — — — 2021 3–9 25.0% #318 1,649 7 47
42 — — — — — — — 2022 0–4 0.0% #1000 1,603 7 47
43 — — — — — — — 2023 3–7 30.0% #412 1,594 7 47