H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC

Anastasia Rodionova vs Virginia Ruano Pascual H2H: 0-1

Virginia Ruano Pascual holds a 1–0 lead over Anastasia Rodionova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Virginia Ruano Pascual leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Virginia Ruano Pascual won the 2008 Rome second round 6-1 6-3.

AUS Age 44 Right-Handed 167 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0 1
1 main draw meetings
ESP Age 52 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 14, 2008* Rome WTA 1000 R64 Clay Virginia Ruano Pascual #85 6-1 6-3 Anastasia Rodionova #67 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Anastasia Rodionova #872 #62 1,095 1,649 86 150 36.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Virginia Ruano Pascual #998 #28 893 1,819 199 235 45.9% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anastasia Rodionova Virginia Ruano Pascual
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1990 0–1 0.0% #307 1,481 0 0
17 1991 2–2 50.0% #194 1,500 0 0
18 2000 0–1 0.0% #239 1,491 0 0 1992 1–4 20.0% #137 1,494 0 0
19 2001 0–2 0.0% #195 1,468 0 0 1993 6–10 37.5% #126 1,515 0 0
20 2002 5–3 62.5% #118 1,521 0 0 1994 0–4 0.0% #171 1,477 0 0
21 2003 7–8 46.7% #165 1,546 0 0 1995 11–13 45.8% #61 1,562 0 0
22 2004 0–1 0.0% #212 1,530 0 0 1996 8–15 34.8% #87 1,570 0 0
23 2005 2–3 40.0% #140 1,517 0 0 1997 18–10 64.3% #52 1,730 0 1
24 2006 10–15 40.0% #94 1,526 0 0 1998 22–16 57.9% #32 1,774 0 2
25 2007 11–20 35.5% #78 1,525 0 0 1999 12–16 42.9% #85 1,659 0 2
26 2008 8–20 28.6% #98 1,503 0 0 2000 8–8 50.0% #89 1,644 0 2
27 2009 5–9 35.7% #95 1,522 0 0 2001 13–18 41.9% #56 1,607 0 2
28 2010 17–20 45.9% #64 1,606 0 0 2002 19–21 47.5% #65 1,633 0 2
29 2011 8–21 27.6% #108 1,573 0 0 2003 19–17 52.8% #55 1,694 0 3
30 2012 6–13 31.6% #139 1,539 0 0 2004 12–16 42.9% #64 1,646 0 3
31 2013 2–7 22.2% #162 1,502 0 0 2005 10–18 35.7% #107 1,560 0 3
32 2014 2–3 40.0% #185 1,514 0 0 2006 15–13 53.6% #66 1,659 0 3
33 2015 1–2 33.3% #235 1,509 0 0 2007 11–14 44.0% #81 1,630 0 3
34 2016 0–1 0.0% #797 1,476 0 0 2008 9–12 42.9% #107 1,622 0 3
35 2017 2–1 66.7% #390 1,485 0 0 2009 3–5 37.5% #200 1,621 0 3
36 2010 0–2 0.0% #998 1,591 0 3