H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:32 UTC

Anastasija Sevastova vs Alizé Cornet H2H: 4-1

Anastasija Sevastova holds a 4–1 lead over Alizé Cornet in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Anastasija Sevastova leads 4–0 on hard courts, while Alizé Cornet leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Anastasija Sevastova won the 2018 Beijing second round 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anastasija Sevastova
LAT Age 36 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
4 – 1
5 main draw meetings
Alizé Cornet
FRA Age 36 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 30, 2018 Beijing WTA 1000 R64 Hard Anastasija Sevastova #19 6-4 6-2 Alizé Cornet #35 Match data
Mar 21, 2018* Miami WTA 1000 R64 Hard Anastasija Sevastova #17 7-5 6-4 Alizé Cornet #38 Match data
Mar 4, 2011* Monterrey WTA 500 R16 Hard Anastasija Sevastova #38 2-6 6-2 6-4 Alizé Cornet #67 Match data
Mar 6, 2010* Monterrey WTA 500 QF Hard Anastasija Sevastova #72 2-6 7-5 6-1 Alizé Cornet #84 Match data
Feb 12, 2009* Paris WTA 500 R32 Carpet Alizé Cornet #13 6-1 6-3 Anastasija Sevastova #195 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Anastasija Sevastova #293 #11 3,366 1,946 207 175 54.2% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Alizé Cornet #460 #11 3,256 1,884 376 358 51.2% 0 0 0 2 4 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anastasija Sevastova Alizé Cornet
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 2005 1–1 50.0% #317 1,515 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 2006 1–2 33.3% #196 1,510 0 0
17 2007 1–1 50.0% #261 1,510 0 0 2007 8–9 47.1% #55 1,570 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2008 34–21 61.8% #16 1,775 0 1
19 2009 5–9 35.7% #79 1,532 0 0 2009 20–24 45.5% #49 1,660 0 1
20 2010 22–15 59.5% #45 1,718 0 1 2010 17–20 45.9% #78 1,610 0 1
21 2011 12–18 40.0% #98 1,628 0 1 2011 10–17 37.0% #88 1,560 0 1
22 2012 0–1 0.0% #184 1,610 0 1 2012 21–19 52.5% #44 1,637 0 2
23 2013 2–2 50.0% #148 1,622 0 1 2013 35–27 56.5% #27 1,730 0 3
24 — — — — — — — 2014 37–24 60.7% #19 1,789 0 4
25 2015 5–3 62.5% #113 1,654 0 1 2015 23–26 46.9% #43 1,632 0 4
26 2016 22–19 53.7% #34 1,715 0 1 2016 20–19 51.3% #41 1,702 0 5
27 2017 37–24 60.7% #16 1,820 0 2 2017 23–22 51.1% #38 1,750 0 5
28 2018 42–21 66.7% #11 1,909 0 3 2018 22–23 48.9% #45 1,693 0 6
29 2019 27–21 56.2% #27 1,759 0 4 2019 25–22 53.2% #59 1,683 0 6
30 2020 1–9 10.0% #54 1,649 0 4 2020 13–9 59.1% #53 1,763 0 6
31 2021 17–17 50.0% #70 1,739 0 4 2021 24–23 51.1% #61 1,744 0 6
32 2022 1–2 33.3% #680 1,722 0 4 2022 26–23 53.1% #36 1,755 0 6
33 — — — — — — — 2023 15–19 44.1% #117 1,684 0 6
34 2024 4–2 66.7% #481 1,728 0 4 2024 1–7 12.5% #391 1,613 0 6
35 2025 9–11 45.0% #188 1,730 0 4 2025 0–1 0.0% #460 1,558 0 6