H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC
Anastasija Sevastova vs Jing-Jing Lu H2H: 1-0
Anastasija Sevastova holds a 1–0 lead over Jing-Jing Lu in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Anastasija Sevastova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anastasija Sevastova won the 2009 Guangzhou third round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
LAT
Age 36
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CHN
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 17, 2009* | Guangzhou | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Anastasija Sevastova | 6-4 6-2 | Jing-Jing Lu | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anastasija Sevastova | #293 | #11 | 3,366 | 1,946 | 207 | 175 | 54.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Jing-Jing Lu | #797 | #159 | 365 | 1,550 | 4 | 13 | 23.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Anastasija Sevastova | Jing-Jing Lu | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #261 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #237 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #79 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #225 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 22–15 | 59.5% | #45 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #247 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #98 | 1,628 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #215 | 1,441 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #184 | 1,610 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #258 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #148 | 1,622 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #163 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #113 | 1,654 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #292 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #34 | 1,715 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #16 | 1,820 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 42–21 | 66.7% | #11 | 1,909 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #27 | 1,759 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #54 | 1,649 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #70 | 1,739 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #680 | 1,722 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #481 | 1,728 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #188 | 1,730 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |