H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC
Anastasija Sevastova holds a 1–0 lead over Jing-Jing Lu in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Anastasija Sevastova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anastasija Sevastova won the 2009 Guangzhou Open first round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anastasija Sevastova | 6-4 6-2 | Jing-Jing Lu | Match data | Sep 17, 2009* | R32 | Guangzhou Open | International → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anastasija Sevastova | #499 | #11 | 3,366 | 1,956 | 209 | 178 | 54.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Jing-Jing Lu | #797 | #159 | 365 | 1,549 | 4 | 13 | 23.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Anastasija Sevastova | Jing-Jing Lu | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #261 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #237 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #79 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #225 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 22–15 | 59.5% | #45 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #247 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #98 | 1,622 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #215 | 1,441 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #184 | 1,605 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #258 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #148 | 1,618 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #163 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #113 | 1,650 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #292 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #34 | 1,713 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #16 | 1,821 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #11 | 1,918 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #27 | 1,759 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #54 | 1,649 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #70 | 1,712 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #680 | 1,699 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #481 | 1,712 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #188 | 1,723 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Anastasija Sevastova | Jing-Jing Lu | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | ||
| 2007 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2009 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2009 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 11 | 8 | 19 | 57.9% | 11 | 6 | 17 | 64.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 12 | 12 | 24 | 50.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2011 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 10 | 10 | 20 | 50.0% | 8 | 6 | 14 | 57.1% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 16 | 15 | 31 | 51.6% | 15 | 7 | 22 | 68.2% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 26 | 14 | 40 | 65.0% | 13 | 5 | 18 | 72.2% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 10 | 13 | 23 | 43.5% | 13 | 7 | 20 | 65.0% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 1 | 7 | 8 | 12.5% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 9 | 12 | 21 | 42.9% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 113 | 106 | 219 | 51.6% | 73 | 51 | 124 | 58.9% | 23 | 19 | 42 | 54.8% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | Career | 4 | 13 | 17 | 23.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 369/387 of Anastasija Sevastova's and 17/17 of Jing-Jing Lu's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Anastasija Sevastova | Jing-Jing Lu | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% |
| 2007 | 2/2 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 68.6% | 61.0% | 55.0% | 52.2% | 50.3% | 59.0% | 49.2% | 2008 | 2/2 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 54.8% | 68.8% | 49.9% | 83.3% | 70.0% | 60.1% | 36.8% |
| 2009 | 13/14 | 1.9 | 3.8 | 57.7% | 60.9% | 42.7% | 46.5% | 52.6% | 53.4% | 42.2% | 2009 | 2/2 | 1.5 | 4.5 | 58.9% | 57.0% | 35.7% | 33.3% | 39.7% | 48.3% | 43.8% |
| 2010 | 34/37 | 1.9 | 3.1 | 59.7% | 61.0% | 48.4% | 50.1% | 50.5% | 56.0% | 44.6% | 2010 | 2/2 | 1.5 | 3.5 | 49.3% | 52.5% | 38.6% | 43.8% | 25.0% | 46.2% | 33.5% |
| 2011 | 29/30 | 2.6 | 3.0 | 60.2% | 61.2% | 43.4% | 43.8% | 50.6% | 54.3% | 42.8% | 2011 | 2/2 | 1.0 | 4.0 | 59.2% | 44.1% | 30.6% | 43.3% | 10.0% | 36.9% | 37.7% |
| 2012 | 1/1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 80.0% | 25.0% | 0.0% | 50.0% | — | 20.0% | 28.6% | 2016 | 1/1 | 2.0 | 9.0 | 52.9% | 54.5% | 44.9% | 56.3% | 42.9% | 50.0% | 49.4% |
| 2013 | 4/4 | 5.3 | 6.3 | 52.3% | 63.4% | 47.3% | 53.4% | 39.7% | 55.6% | 41.3% | 2017 | 5/5 | 1.2 | 5.6 | 54.9% | 59.2% | 39.2% | 47.6% | 36.1% | 50.3% | 42.1% |
| 2015 | 5/8 | 1.8 | 2.4 | 59.9% | 62.4% | 47.5% | 49.0% | 51.4% | 56.2% | 43.7% | 2018 | 3/3 | 0.3 | 2.7 | 65.4% | 53.7% | 43.5% | 46.0% | 64.3% | 50.3% | 40.5% |
| 2016 | 39/41 | 2.1 | 2.6 | 56.4% | 64.3% | 45.3% | 57.0% | 48.6% | 56.1% | 43.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 61/61 | 2.1 | 2.3 | 61.2% | 63.4% | 47.9% | 48.5% | 54.1% | 57.3% | 45.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 62/66 | 3.0 | 2.2 | 60.8% | 66.3% | 47.8% | 52.6% | 50.3% | 58.9% | 46.2% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 48/49 | 2.5 | 2.0 | 58.8% | 64.8% | 50.3% | 52.2% | 46.3% | 58.7% | 44.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 10/10 | 2.4 | 2.3 | 60.0% | 55.3% | 43.1% | 43.3% | 31.6% | 50.7% | 37.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 33/35 | 1.9 | 2.8 | 59.4% | 62.1% | 46.7% | 54.4% | 52.0% | 55.9% | 44.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 3/3 | 2.7 | 2.7 | 64.0% | 64.6% | 38.9% | 27.2% | 34.9% | 55.7% | 41.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 6/6 | 1.2 | 1.5 | 69.3% | 65.6% | 49.5% | 45.5% | 53.6% | 60.6% | 49.9% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 19/20 | 2.3 | 3.2 | 65.5% | 60.6% | 40.7% | 52.1% | 38.7% | 53.4% | 41.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 369/387 | 2.3 | 2.6 | 60.1% | 63.1% | 46.7% | 50.7% | 49.1% | 56.5% | 44.1% | Career | 17/17 | 1.2 | 4.3 | 56.9% | 56.3% | 40.1% | 49.4% | 41.5% | 49.1% | 40.3% |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Anastasija Sevastova | Jing-Jing Lu | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule |
| 2007 | 1510 | 107.3 | +0.28 | -0.88 | 1.201 | 53.9% | — | — | — | 60.0% | +1.60 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | -0.14 | 2008 | 1504 | 102.9 | +1.75 | -1.27 | 0.922 | 48.8% | — | — | — | 50.0% | 0.00 | — | 1–0 | — | +0.16 |
| 2009 | 1532 | 109.5 | -0.95 | -1.06 | 0.905 | 47.8% | +22 | -5 | — | 37.5% | -0.72 | 2–2 (50%) | 0–2 | — | -0.37 | 2009 | 1482 | 101.3 | -1.06 | -0.30 | 0.847 | 46.0% | — | — | — | 20.0% | -1.40 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.12 |
| 2010 | 1700 | 136.1 | +0.52 | +1.27 | 1.013 | 50.4% | -18 | -56 | — | 50.0% | +0.10 | 10–4 (71%) | 5–3 (63%) | 112.0 | -1.72 | 2010 | 1461 | 97.9 | -2.41 | -2.92 | 0.622 | 39.7% | — | — | — | 20.0% | -3.00 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.14 |
| 2011 | 1623 | 125.8 | -0.67 | -0.46 | 0.936 | 48.5% | +20 | -35 | — | 47.7% | -0.23 | 2–7 (22%) | 5–4 (56%) | 93.7 | -1.25 | 2011 | 1442 | 94.0 | -1.58 | -0.65 | 0.597 | 38.2% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -5.00 | — | — | — | -0.03 |
| 2012 | 1606 | — | -4.79 | -0.63 | 0.357 | 26.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | -0.02 | 2016 | 1474 | 103.1 | -3.35 | +1.52 | 0.988 | 49.7% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -0.33 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.02 |
| 2013 | 1618 | 108.8 | -1.89 | -0.55 | 0.931 | 48.2% | +29 | — | — | 44.4% | -0.56 | 1–0 | 1–0 | — | -0.36 | 2017 | 1535 | 104.6 | -3.20 | -1.74 | 0.847 | 46.2% | +19 | — | — | 38.5% | -1.38 | 2–1 (67%) | 1–0 | — | +0.26 |
| 2015 | 1651 | 116.6 | -0.45 | +1.55 | 0.997 | 49.7% | +20 | -58 | — | 63.2% | +0.10 | 1–2 (33%) | 4–0 (100%) | 103.0 | +0.37 | 2018 | 1514 | 101.1 | -2.41 | -1.84 | 0.814 | 45.4% | +16 | — | — | 28.6% | -1.29 | 1–0 | — | — | +0.35 |
| 2016 | 1713 | 129.3 | +0.55 | -0.36 | 0.984 | 49.6% | -12 | -43 | -134 | 53.9% | +0.07 | 5–4 (56%) | 5–2 (71%) | 104.2 | -0.43 | 2023 | 1502 | 98.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 1821 | 142.6 | +0.98 | +2.00 | 1.060 | 51.3% | -53 | -13 | -127 | 58.1% | +0.59 | 9–7 (56%) | 4–9 (31%) | 102.4 | +0.20 | 2024 | 1485 | 98.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 1918 | 151.6 | +2.10 | +3.32 | 1.125 | 52.4% | -17 | -8 | -182 | 60.1% | +0.74 | 17–7 (71%) | 8–8 (50%) | 106.2 | -0.51 | 2025 | 1479 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 1759 | 136.0 | +1.82 | +0.39 | 1.068 | 51.1% | -11 | +149 | 0 | 56.8% | +0.43 | 9–13 (41%) | 6–5 (55%) | 93.5 | +2.29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 1649 | 114.7 | -2.98 | -3.36 | 0.751 | 43.8% | +22 | — | — | 13.6% | -2.27 | 1–1 | 0–3 (0%) | — | -0.12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 1713 | 129.5 | -0.41 | +1.61 | 1.003 | 50.1% | -94 | +132 | +101 | 50.0% | +0.10 | 7–9 (44%) | 5–7 (42%) | 95.5 | +0.39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 1699 | 110.3 | -1.74 | +1.28 | 0.927 | 48.1% | -77 | — | — | 33.3% | -1.17 | — | — | — | -0.20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 1698 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 1713 | 111.5 | +0.69 | +0.90 | 1.267 | 54.9% | -42 | — | — | 75.0% | +1.75 | — | — | — | +0.34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 1723 | 126.0 | -2.14 | -1.19 | 0.879 | 47.2% | -3 | +53 | — | 43.8% | -0.58 | 5–3 (63%) | 2–1 (67%) | 104.0 | -0.66 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 1677 | 90.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 1956 | 140.5 | +0.50 | +0.97 | 1.015 | 50.2% | -21 | +17 | -80 | 52.8% | +0.18 | 69–60 (53%) | 45–45 (50%) | 104.7 | -0.57 | Career | 1550 | 101.6 | -1.95 | -1.35 | 0.792 | 44.9% | +18 | — | — | 29.3% | -1.71 | 3–4 (43%) | 2–0 | — | +6.00 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Simona Halep | 3 | 6 | 9 | Mar 28, 2021 | H2H |
| Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova | 1 | 7 | 8 | Apr 23, 2025 | H2H |
| Julia Goerges | 3 | 5 | 8 | Aug 10, 2018 | H2H |
| Naomi Osaka | 2 | 4 | 6 | Aug 3, 2025 | H2H |
| Donna Vekic | 5 | 1 | 6 | Jan 13, 2020 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Su-Wei Hsieh | 0 | 2 | 2 | Oct 12, 2017 | H2H |
| Alisa Kleybanova | 0 | 2 | 2 | Mar 3, 2011 | H2H |
| Fang Ying Xun | 0 | 1 | 1 | Jul 27, 2018 | H2H |
| Kurumi Nara | 1 | 0 | 1 | Jul 26, 2018 | H2H |
| Johanna Larsson | 0 | 1 | 1 | Feb 1, 2018 | H2H |