H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Anastasija Sevastova vs Johanna Konta H2H: 3-1
Anastasija Sevastova holds a 3–1 lead over Johanna Konta in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Anastasija Sevastova leads 2–0 on clay, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Anastasija Sevastova won the 2021 Madrid third round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
LAT
Age 36
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
GBR
Age 35
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 3, 2021* | Madrid | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Anastasija Sevastova | 6-3 6-3 | Johanna Konta | Match data |
| Apr 28, 2017* | Stuttgart | WTA 500 | R16 | Clay | Anastasija Sevastova | 6-3 7-5 | Johanna Konta | Match data |
| Oct 2, 2016 | Beijing | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Johanna Konta | 6-1 4-1 | Anastasija Sevastova | Match data |
| Sep 6, 2016* | US Open | Grand Slam | R16 | Hard | Anastasija Sevastova | 6-4 7-5 | Johanna Konta | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anastasija Sevastova | #293 | #11 | 3,366 | 1,946 | 207 | 175 | 54.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Johanna Konta | #113 | #4 | 5,110 | 1,990 | 174 | 120 | 59.2% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anastasija Sevastova | Johanna Konta | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #261 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2009 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #79 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2010 | 22–15 | 59.5% | #45 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #308 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2011 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #98 | 1,628 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #156 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #184 | 1,610 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #114 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2013 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #148 | 1,622 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #148 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 13–8 | 61.9% | #48 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2015 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #113 | 1,654 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 42–22 | 65.6% | #10 | 1,854 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2016 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #34 | 1,715 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 36–17 | 67.9% | #9 | 1,836 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2017 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #16 | 1,820 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #37 | 1,794 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2018 | 42–21 | 66.7% | #11 | 1,909 | 0 | 3 | 2019 | 33–15 | 68.8% | #12 | 1,925 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2019 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #27 | 1,759 | 0 | 4 | 2020 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #14 | 1,825 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2020 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #54 | 1,649 | 0 | 4 | 2021 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #113 | 1,807 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 2021 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #70 | 1,739 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2022 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #680 | 1,722 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2024 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #481 | 1,728 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2025 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #188 | 1,730 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |