H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Anastasija Sevastova vs Na Li H2H: 0-2

Na Li holds a 2–0 lead over Anastasija Sevastova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Na Li leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Na Li won the 2011 Porsche Tennis Grand Prix round of 32 6-2 6-3.

Latvia Age 36 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0 2
2 main-draw meetings
CHN Age 44 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Na Li #6 6-2 6-3 Anastasija Sevastova #37 Match data Apr 21, 2011* R32 Porsche Tennis Grand Prix Premier modern equivalent WTA 500 Clay
Na Li #15 7-6(6) 6-3 Anastasija Sevastova #55 Match data Oct 8, 2010* QF China Open Premier Mandatory modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Anastasija Sevastova #499 #11 3,366 1,956 209 178 54.0% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Na Li #9 #2 7,585 2,117 338 159 68.0% 2 1 0 1 5 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anastasija Sevastova Na Li
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2007 1–1 50.0% #261 1,510 0 0
18 2000 1–3 25.0% #136 1,496 0 0
19 2009 5–9 35.7% #79 1,531 0 0 2001 0–1 0.0% #302 1,480 0 0
20 2010 22–15 59.5% #45 1,699 0 1
21 2011 12–18 40.0% #98 1,622 0 1
22 2012 0–1 0.0% #184 1,605 0 1 2004 6–1 85.7% #78 1,599 0 1
23 2013 2–2 50.0% #148 1,618 0 1 2005 23–14 62.2% #56 1,710 0 1
24 2006 36–22 62.1% #21 1,818 0 1
25 2015 5–3 62.5% #113 1,650 0 1 2007 22–12 64.7% #29 1,819 0 1
26 2016 22–19 53.7% #34 1,713 0 1 2008 28–14 66.7% #23 1,863 0 2
27 2017 37–24 60.7% #16 1,821 0 2 2009 35–17 67.3% #15 1,938 0 2
28 2018 44–22 66.7% #11 1,918 0 3 2010 36–20 64.3% #11 1,849 0 3
29 2019 27–22 55.1% #27 1,759 0 4 2011 33–17 66.0% #5 1,862 1 5
30 2020 1–9 10.0% #54 1,649 0 4 2012 43–17 71.7% #7 1,999 1 6
31 2021 17–18 48.6% #70 1,712 0 4 2013 46–14 76.7% #3 2,067 1 7
32 2022 1–2 33.3% #680 1,699 0 4 2014 29–7 80.6% #9 2,024 2 9
34 2024 4–2 66.7% #481 1,712 0 4
35 2025 9–11 45.0% #188 1,723 0 4

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Anastasija Sevastova Na Li
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2007 1 1 2 50.0%
18 2000 1 3 4 25.0%
19 2009 4 3 7 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2001 0 1 1 0.0%
20 2010 11 8 19 57.9% 11 6 17 64.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 2011 12 12 24 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 2012 0 1 1 0.0% 2004 6 1 7 85.7%
23 2013 2 2 4 50.0% 2005 16 12 28 57.1% 7 2 9 77.8%
24 2006 18 14 32 56.3% 12 4 16 75.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2015 2 1 3 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 2007 13 5 18 72.2% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 2016 10 10 20 50.0% 8 6 14 57.1% 4 3 7 57.1% 2008 26 12 38 68.4% 2 2 4 50.0%
27 2017 16 15 31 51.6% 15 7 22 68.2% 6 2 8 75.0% 2009 22 9 31 71.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
28 2018 26 14 40 65.0% 13 5 18 72.2% 5 3 8 62.5% 2010 17 14 31 54.8% 10 4 14 71.4% 9 2 11 81.8%
29 2019 10 13 23 43.5% 13 7 20 65.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2011 16 12 28 57.1% 15 3 18 83.3% 2 2 4 50.0%
30 2020 1 7 8 12.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 2012 30 10 40 75.0% 12 4 16 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2021 9 12 21 42.9% 4 4 8 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2013 35 8 43 81.4% 5 4 9 55.6% 6 2 8 75.0%
32 2022 1 2 3 33.3% 2014 22 3 25 88.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 1 3 66.7%
34 2024 4 2 6 66.7%
35 2025 5 5 10 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
Career 113 106 219 51.6% 73 51 124 58.9% 23 19 42 54.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 222 104 326 68.1% 77 33 110 70.0% 37 18 55 67.3% 2 4 6 33.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 369/387 of Anastasija Sevastova's and 372/485 of Na Li's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Anastasija Sevastova Na Li
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 2007 2/2 1.0 2.0 68.6% 61.0% 55.0% 52.2% 50.3% 59.0% 49.2% —/—
19 2009 13/14 1.9 3.8 57.7% 60.9% 42.7% 46.5% 52.6% 53.4% 42.2% —/—
20 2010 34/37 1.9 3.1 59.7% 61.0% 48.4% 50.1% 50.5% 56.0% 44.6% —/—
21 2011 29/30 2.6 3.0 60.2% 61.2% 43.4% 43.8% 50.6% 54.3% 42.8% —/—
22 2012 1/1 0.0 0.0 80.0% 25.0% 0.0% 50.0% 20.0% 28.6% —/—
23 2013 4/4 5.3 6.3 52.3% 63.4% 47.3% 53.4% 39.7% 55.6% 41.3% 2005 2/37 1.5 3.5 71.4% 54.3% 62.6% 49.2% 41.7% 56.3% 43.6%
24 —/— 2006 36/58 1.9 2.3 71.1% 61.5% 49.3% 51.6% 50.5% 57.6% 45.2%
25 2015 5/8 1.8 2.4 59.9% 62.4% 47.5% 49.0% 51.4% 56.2% 43.7% 2007 33/34 1.5 2.0 71.5% 62.4% 51.9% 52.6% 45.7% 59.2% 46.2%
26 2016 39/41 2.1 2.6 56.4% 64.3% 45.3% 57.0% 48.6% 56.1% 43.1% 2008 32/42 2.2 3.9 66.3% 63.4% 48.3% 58.5% 51.1% 58.2% 46.8%
27 2017 61/61 2.1 2.3 61.2% 63.4% 47.9% 48.5% 54.1% 57.3% 45.3% 2009 47/52 2.1 2.9 63.9% 65.4% 51.1% 45.7% 50.4% 59.9% 46.1%
28 2018 62/66 3.0 2.2 60.8% 66.3% 47.8% 52.6% 50.3% 58.9% 46.2% 2010 48/56 2.3 2.9 68.5% 65.7% 49.2% 50.4% 51.7% 60.4% 47.3%
29 2019 48/49 2.5 2.0 58.8% 64.8% 50.3% 52.2% 46.3% 58.7% 44.1% 2011 39/50 2.1 3.2 69.1% 64.4% 47.3% 54.6% 51.5% 59.1% 45.2%
30 2020 10/10 2.4 2.3 60.0% 55.3% 43.1% 43.3% 31.6% 50.7% 37.0% 2012 49/60 2.3 3.0 68.7% 65.1% 53.5% 57.5% 51.0% 61.2% 47.8%
31 2021 33/35 1.9 2.8 59.4% 62.1% 46.7% 54.4% 52.0% 55.9% 44.3% 2013 52/60 2.8 4.2 63.2% 67.9% 49.4% 58.5% 57.2% 61.0% 49.3%
32 2022 3/3 2.7 2.7 64.0% 64.6% 38.9% 27.2% 34.9% 55.7% 41.1% 2014 34/36 1.9 4.0 66.5% 66.3% 49.7% 55.6% 57.2% 60.8% 50.0%
34 2024 6/6 1.2 1.5 69.3% 65.6% 49.5% 45.5% 53.6% 60.6% 49.9% —/—
35 2025 19/20 2.3 3.2 65.5% 60.6% 40.7% 52.1% 38.7% 53.4% 41.0% —/—
Career 369/387 2.3 2.6 60.1% 63.1% 46.7% 50.7% 49.1% 56.5% 44.1% 372/497 2.2 3.2 67.4% 64.9% 50.1% 53.8% 51.9% 59.9% 47.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Anastasija Sevastova Na Li
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2007 1510 107.3 +0.28 -0.88 1.201 53.9% 60.0% +1.60 0–1 0–1 -0.14
18 2000 1497 107.1 +34 14.3% -2.14 0–1 -0.21
19 2009 1532 109.5 -0.95 -1.06 0.905 47.8% +22 -5 37.5% -0.72 2–2 (50%) 0–2 -0.37 2001 1481 95.3 0.0% -4.00 +0.12
20 2010 1700 136.1 +0.52 +1.27 1.013 50.4% -18 -56 50.0% +0.10 10–4 (71%) 5–3 (63%) 112.0 -1.72
21 2011 1623 125.8 -0.67 -0.46 0.936 48.5% +20 -35 47.7% -0.23 2–7 (22%) 5–4 (56%) 93.7 -1.25
22 2012 1606 -4.79 -0.63 0.357 26.3% -0.02 2004 1600 125.7 +18 81.3% +1.81 1–1 2–1 (67%) +0.22
23 2013 1618 108.8 -1.89 -0.55 0.931 48.2% +29 44.4% -0.56 1–0 1–0 -0.36 2005 1711 139.1 -0.18 +0.14 0.999 49.8% -25 -56 61.4% +1.04 8–5 (62%) 4–4 (50%) 103.5 -0.97
24 2006 1819 148.7 +1.65 +1.60 1.068 51.4% -79 -12 -62 61.2% +1.05 9–4 (69%) 7–4 (64%) 111.4 -2.52
25 2015 1651 116.6 -0.45 +1.55 0.997 49.7% +20 -58 63.2% +0.10 1–2 (33%) 4–0 (100%) 103.0 +0.37 2007 1820 150.2 +2.75 +2.06 1.133 52.7% +69 -38 -48 62.2% +0.96 7–7 (50%) 3–1 (75%) 102.0 +0.95
26 2016 1713 129.3 +0.55 -0.36 0.984 49.6% -12 -43 -134 53.9% +0.07 5–4 (56%) 5–2 (71%) 104.2 -0.43 2008 1864 153.7 +2.74 +2.93 1.119 52.6% +37 -127 60.4% +0.83 12–5 (71%) 4–4 (50%) 103.2 -1.80
27 2017 1821 142.6 +0.98 +2.00 1.060 51.3% -53 -13 -127 58.1% +0.59 9–7 (56%) 4–9 (31%) 102.4 +0.20 2009 1938 153.8 +4.35 +2.54 1.150 52.7% +49 -152 -127 64.9% +1.04 10–6 (63%) 8–6 (57%) 103.4 -2.23
28 2018 1918 151.6 +2.10 +3.32 1.125 52.4% -17 -8 -182 60.1% +0.74 17–7 (71%) 8–8 (50%) 106.2 -0.51 2010 1850 150.5 +4.51 +3.61 1.195 53.7% -23 -4 +91 64.3% +1.23 9–9 (50%) 6–7 (46%) 96.6 +0.93
29 2019 1759 136.0 +1.82 +0.39 1.068 51.1% -11 +149 0 56.8% +0.43 9–13 (41%) 6–5 (55%) 93.5 +2.29 2011 1862 151.3 +3.52 +2.62 1.106 52.2% -57 +131 +42 62.8% +0.61 8–7 (53%) 9–6 (60%) 102.8 -0.26
30 2020 1649 114.7 -2.98 -3.36 0.751 43.8% +22 13.6% -2.27 1–1 0–3 (0%) -0.12 2012 2000 162.2 +5.42 +5.11 1.234 54.2% -1 -5 -158 68.1% +1.30 11–10 (52%) 6–4 (60%) 100.7 0.00
31 2021 1713 129.5 -0.41 +1.61 1.003 50.1% -94 +132 +101 50.0% +0.10 7–9 (44%) 5–7 (42%) 95.5 +0.39 2013 2067 165.5 +5.56 +6.05 1.265 55.0% +56 -126 -177 72.1% +1.64 8–5 (62%) 7–6 (54%) 99.0 -2.68
32 2022 1699 110.3 -1.74 +1.28 0.927 48.1% -77 33.3% -1.17 -0.20 2014 2024 155.9 +4.17 +5.37 1.275 55.5% +114 -110 -151 75.0% +1.82 6–4 (60%) 5–5 (50%) 96.9 +0.97
33 2023 1698
34 2024 1713 111.5 +0.69 +0.90 1.267 54.9% -42 75.0% +1.75 +0.34
35 2025 1723 126.0 -2.14 -1.19 0.879 47.2% -3 +53 43.8% -0.58 5–3 (63%) 2–1 (67%) 104.0 -0.66
36 2026 1677 90.8
Career 1956 140.5 +0.50 +0.97 1.015 50.2% -21 +17 -80 52.8% +0.18 69–60 (53%) 45–45 (50%) 104.7 -0.57 2117 160.4 +4.01 +3.66 1.175 53.4% +13 -21 -66 65.1% +1.13 89–64 (58%) 61–48 (56%) 106.5 -1.53

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.